Swarles Barkley Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 Players betted on us to lose. So the match was fixed. Are you joking or is this true. Hope it ****ing aint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueblood88 Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 Danns can **** off, he's average at best. Maybe now he can concentrate on his spitter 2 bollocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Fox Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfzXB1WlEEU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 jamie vardy â€@vardy7 The situation is hilarious. #teamsituation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheUltimateWinner Posted 29 August 2012 Author Share Posted 29 August 2012 -Runs- To be fair I put 2 + 2 together, Seeing news articles then a source tweeting something's going on... Anyway, I apologise I panicked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman's Wharfer Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 What really is the point in Tweeting that something's happened then not actually saying what it is? If you can't explain what you put then why put it out there in the first place unless it's for your own ego. Not doubting credibility at all but it's like me saying: "Oh! Don't like what I'm hearing about the next X Factor judge" (assuming I've built my following on being an X Factor insider) and then when people ask for more being elusive and ambiguous. Why do that? I know it's been much debated on here but I get the impression that this Bert used to know stuff and is now clinging on to his notoriety with vague bits he gets hold of now and then. That's why I've stopped following him. Annoying that others cling on his every Tweet. Whether this is Pearson-related I don't know. I hope not, but it's hard not to think that when things have been phrased as they are. If that's not the case then it doesn't exactly help implying that at this moment in time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crisp packet Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 http://www.holmesdale.net/page.php?id=106&tid=124168 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 ? He was shocking last night I'll ask around to see if I can get anything like the same person who told me about England representives being at the game before hand.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simo86 Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 jamie vardy â€@vardy7 The situation is hilarious. #teamsituation I hope you are not being serious! He's on about Celebrity Big Brother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox 4 Life Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 If its Danns just **** him off, more interested in his music anyway. Pearson can't be sacked after 3 league games. If so the owners are clueless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salieri Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 Newsflash : Not everything written on the internet is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry - LCFC Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 I give up if this is true, same ****ing shit season after ****ing season! It doesn't work sacking managers every 5 ****ing minutes!!!!!!!!!!! Shame that so many people don't realise this. Only sack a manager if he really is leading the club backwards, Pearson certainly hasn't taken us backwards from last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitchandro Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 What really is the point in Tweeting that something's happened then not actually saying what it is? If you can't explain what you put then why put it out there in the first place unless it's for your own ego. Not doubting credibility at all but it's like me saying: "Oh! Don't like what I'm hearing about the next X Factor judge" (assuming I've built my following on being an X Factor insider) and then when people ask for more being elusive and ambiguous. Why do that? I know it's been much debated on here but I get the impression that this Bert used to know stuff and is now clinging on to his notoriety with vague bits he gets hold of now and then. That's why I've stopped following him. Annoying that others cling on his every Tweet. Whether this is Pearson-related I don't know. I hope not, but it's hard not to think that when things have been phrased as they are. If that's not the case then it doesn't exactly help implying that at this moment in time. I was thinking this but last time I asked that I got banned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trav Le Bleu Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 Newsflash : Not everything written on the internet is true. Shocking innit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingfox Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 what are you on? I heard that some of the players betted on us to lose, I thought at first what a load of bollocks. But going by Bert's comment here. BertLcfc â€@BertLcfc No specific names were mentioned either. Not saying something will come of it either. Explains the out if character performance last night. Im starting to think differently, I bloody well hope not but I have my doubts now. Or there was a bust up between a player and staff, probably involving a headbutt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 What really is the point in Tweeting that something's happened then not actually saying what it is? If you can't explain what you put then why put it out there in the first place unless it's for your own ego. Not doubting credibility at all but it's like me saying: "Oh! Don't like what I'm hearing about the next X Factor judge" (assuming I've built my following on being an X Factor insider) and then when people ask for more being elusive and ambiguous. Why do that? I know it's been much debated on here but I get the impression that this Bert used to know stuff and is now clinging on to his notoriety with vague bits he gets hold of now and then. That's why I've stopped following him. Annoying that others cling on his every Tweet. Whether this is Pearson-related I don't know. I hope not, but it's hard not to think that when things have been phrased as they are. If that's not the case then it doesn't exactly help implying that at this moment in time. Bert can't control the way you think and what you decide to think . He also doesn't decide the way you like to imply how things are interpreted. No-one has mentioned Pearson; if anything it's your own fault for always thinking the worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AoWW Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 Any Nugent tweets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swarles Barkley Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 What really is the point in Tweeting that something's happened then not actually saying what it is? If you can't explain what you put then why put it out there in the first place unless it's for your own ego. Not doubting credibility at all but it's like me saying: "Oh! Don't like what I'm hearing about the next X Factor judge" (assuming I've built my following on being an X Factor insider) and then when people ask for more being elusive and ambiguous. Why do that? I know it's been much debated on here but I get the impression that this Bert used to know stuff and is now clinging on to his notoriety with vague bits he gets hold of now and then. That's why I've stopped following him. Annoying that others cling on his every Tweet. Whether this is Pearson-related I don't know. I hope not, but it's hard not to think that when things have been phrased as they are. If that's not the case then it doesn't exactly help implying that at this moment in time. This. Well said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxfanazer Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 If its Danns just **** him off, more interested in his music anyway. Pearson can't be sacked after 3 league games. If so the owners are clueless Is what Danns? I'm confused! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 I am stunned that Beckford hasn't been mentioned yet, though. Disappointed in you all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox92 Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 He was shocking last night I'll ask around to see if I can get anything like the same person who told me about England representives being at the game before hand.. What's that mean? Are you suggesting he's been sacked Ashley? (I don't know what you mean) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickelbyfox Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 My god this cant be for real! How come it always seems to happen to us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simo86 Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 It's all Wellens' fault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 Bet it's Beckford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted 29 August 2012 Share Posted 29 August 2012 Anyone remember Danns posting last week about a 'air/situation' surrounding him that he didn't like? Could be to do with that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.