Happy Fox Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 Done f**k all for the past two seasons and factor in his wages will allow us to bring in a better player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKCJ Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 Any reasoning for Stringer to say he hasn't gone yet? He's still in tears with Gally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crisp monster Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 Was one our best for a while but faded badly - got put on silly wages which was daft on our part. Did anyone make a move for him so we improved his terms at the time? Glad he's gone but I wish him well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonaldinho Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 If he was on £15k a week then he has left with a cool £1.5 million. Wouldn't it be £700-750k roughly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend_in_blue Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 This pay off ought to come straight out of Neville's pocket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricey Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 Was one our best for a while but faded badly - got put on silly wages which was daft on our part. Did anyone make a move for him so we improved his terms at the time? Glad he's gone but I wish him well Birmingham were linked if I remember correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phillo Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 Good luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxes4e4 Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 2/7 gone? hopefully : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5waller5 Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 Good luck to him. He was a good servant to the club, despite some of the idiots getting on his back. No he wasn't. Servants don't earn £10k+ a week. They don't choose when to work and when not to. They don't throw a paddy with the manager because they've driven all the way to "work" and then not been picked to play. Good riddance to him. He was anything but a "good servant". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCFC FOX Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 The owners are billionaires, it's like one of us paying a tenner to remove someone you hate from your life. Won't affect us at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleckneymike Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 No he wasn't. Servants don't earn £10k+ a week. They don't choose when to work and when not to. They don't throw a paddy with the manager because they've driven all the way to "work" and then not been picked to play. Good riddance to him. He was anything but a "good servant". We do seem to have lost perspective on what qualifies as a good servant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCFC FOX Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 Was good for the first season under Pearson and that is it, was never the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MC Prussian Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 No he wasn't. Servants don't earn £10k+ a week. They don't choose when to work and when not to. They don't throw a paddy with the manager because they've driven all the way to "work" and then not been picked to play. Good riddance to him. He was anything but a "good servant". He was a good servant - sadly, it was for a limited time only. Much like a sales frenzy at Walmart. And then the age showed. Also for your consideration: "Servant: One who is publicly employed to perform services, as for a government" So he was indeed a servant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deucalion Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 Wouldn't it be £700-750k roughly? Two years left? £15k x 104 weeks = £1.5 million + ... doesn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fleckneymike Posted 22 July 2013 Share Posted 22 July 2013 He was a good servant - sadly, it was for a limited time only. Much like a sales frenzy at Walmart. And then the age showed. Also for your consideration: "Servant: One who is publicly employed to perform services, as for a government" So he was indeed a servant. By no stretch of the imagination or loose definition was he a 'good servant'. He was an ok player for one season, pretty mediocre for another two before becoming truculent and moody for the remainder. Lets stop this habit of beatification for every ex City player, in a few years it'll be Ritchie who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stadt Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 Two years left? £15k x 104 weeks = £1.5 million + ... doesn't it? Tax? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
00rawat Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 Will this be confirmed soon? if it is true that is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lestajigs Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 On a positive note ill Never forget the shift he put in at Cardiff in the playoffs, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Year Of The Fox Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 On a positive note ill Never forget the shift he put in at Cardiff in the playoffs, That and Norwich away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnegan Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 :w00t: Decent first season, dross since. Great, City are countering, bit of pace, good move and... Richie Wellens has put his foot on the ball. Back to sleep, everyone. Most frustrating player I've seen here in the last decade and I include Gallagher in that. Delighted. Don't give a toss who that outrages, a couple of moments of quality don't a player make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 Birmingham were linked if I remember correctly. and / or Blackpool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ttfn Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 You didn't receive any Beckford money But supposedly our problem is not cash flow, it's FFP. So there sort of is "Beckford money". Not to mention that, according to you, the fee receivable by us went towards paying off a debt to Everton. In which case we did receive money, whether it touched our bank statement or not. It will still have been used to offset our loss on disposal of Beckford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bert Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 Any reasoning for Stringer to say he hasn't gone yet?Yep, because he spoke directly to Wellens yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 23 July 2013 Share Posted 23 July 2013 This pay off ought to come straight out of Neville's pocket.Here we go again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.