Unabomber Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Schmeichel Moore Wasilewski Morgan Konchesky Hammond James Knockaert Drinkwater Dyer Vardy I would be tempted to go with something like that, the main issue being who to play up top and whether to put King in for James.
kingfox Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 I really want us to win this. Their fans are vile. My mum is vile then. Nice Steve, Nice
Callabinho Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 how about... Schmeichel Wasyl Miquel Morgan Moore King Drinky Konchesky/Schlupp Knocky Vardy Wood
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Keep the same team as the last league game no changes needed to a winning side at all!! Plus Watford dont look as good as they were last year when i watched them play Brighton on monday. Also i found this decent website created by some kid quite good info a stuff on it all to do with the foxes check it out. http://cameronbarnes98.wix.com/foxes-fans-uk Decent website:D Scandalous self-promotion You "found" it? So the fact your user name is Cam, as well as the website creator being called Cameron is purely coincidental, is it?
KFS Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 My mum is vile then. Nice Steve, Nice For making you, she is exempt x
deep blue Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Am I the only one with a half-empty glass about this fixture? I'm just concerned that after the euphoria of last night there might be some kind of a negative reaction in the squad on Saturday. Either over-confidence, or the flatness of mood that sometimes follows a fine achievement, or simply physical/emotional tiredness. Also, maybe, over-eagerness to eradicate memories of last May and/or wish for revenge, which could cause rash actions. I hope and trust that Nige will get them in the right physical condition and frame of mind.
BrummieFOX Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Scandalous self-promotion You "found" it? So the fact your user name is Cam, as well as the website creator being called Cameron is purely coincidental, is it? Haha, 'some kid'.
lovelcfc Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Kasper Moore wasly wes schullp Knockaert drinkwater king Nugent wood vardy
dayday Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Knockaert will get plenty of stick over that penalty last season just hope he does lose his head
foxfanazer Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Knockaert will get plenty of stick over that penalty last season just hope he does lose his headThat's just cruel!
stud2012 Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 For me Kasper Moore Wasyl Wes Miquel Konch Hammond Drinks king Vardy Wood Bench Logan,Nuge,Knocky,James,GTF,Jeff,Dyer Knocky and Dyer to come on IMPACT players if needed!
LCFC FOX Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Schmeichel Moore Morgan Miquel Koncheskey Knockaert James Drinkwater Dyer Wood Vardy Logan, Wasyl, Schlupp, King, Hammond, Taylor-Fletcher, Nugent
hackneyfox Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Blimey Nugent finally scores from open play and then makes another last night and many have drafted Wood in.
Silverdaz Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Kasper Moore wasly wes schullp Knockaert drinkwater king Nugent wood vardy What no Dyer??, sure if your going for a midfield three you cant have knockaert in there its got to be hammond/james
LCFC FOX Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Wood was better than Nugent when he came on Saturday and he was one of the better players last night too. I would bring him in and out of Vardy and Nugent it would be for Nugent
Greatness_Since_1884 Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Like Gingerr says, I'm thinking 3-5-2 to match them up. If he doesn't use if for this game then I don't think he ever will: Schmeichel Wasilewski - Morgan - Miquel Moore - Drinkwater - Knockaert - King - Dyer Vardy - Nugent Subs: Logan, St Ledger, Schlupp, Hammond, James, Taylor-Fletcher, Wood
Zaid Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 the sky sports commentators are going to go on and on and on about the playoffs might just mute them and listen to RL
stud2012 Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Like Gingerr says, I'm thinking 3-5-2 to match them up. If he doesn't use if for this game then I don't think he ever will: Schmeichel Wasilewski - Morgan - Miquel Moore - Drinkwater - Knockaert - King - Dyer Vardy - Nugent Subs: Logan, St Ledger, Schlupp, Hammond, James, Taylor-Fletcher, Wood Knocky in cen mid?Dyer covering at the back?Dont work mate in my opinion.Sure 3 in the middle flanked by 2 wide wing-backs could work but has to be James or Hammond in the middle not Knocky!
indierich06 Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Wood was better than Nugent when he came on Saturday and he was one of the better players last night too. I would bring him in and out of Vardy and Nugent it would be for Nugent Was he? From what I remember it was Nugent who scored one of the goals that contributed to our win despite being ill, not Wood? Wood's assist wasn't even that good as any half-decent keeper would have been all over it.
SmithyFox12 Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Kasper Wasilewski Moore Morgan Konch James King Drinkwater Vardy Nuge Wood
Greatness_Since_1884 Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Knocky in cen mid?Dyer covering at the back?Dont work mate in my opinion.Sure 3 in the middle flanked by 2 wide wing-backs could work but has to be James or Hammond in the middle not Knocky! To be honest that line up is a bit deceptive. I pictured it more as Knockaert in a free role behind the strikers with DD and King sitting behind. I think Dyer would do fine as a LWB with the cover of Miquel behind him. I was wary of the type of wing backs. When we've played it before with two genuine full backs as wing backs it's been a very restrictive system. I felt one full back and one winger would give a better balance to the side.
LCFC FOX Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 Was he? From what I remember it was Nugent who scored one of the goals that contributed to our win despite being ill, not Wood? Wood's assist wasn't even that good as any half-decent keeper would have been all over it. Yes he was, I'm not slating Nugent I just feel Wood should come in. If you're going to say that you could say the same for Nugents goal. Any half decent keeper would've tipped it round the post.
stud2012 Posted 30 October 2013 Posted 30 October 2013 To be honest that line up is a bit deceptive. I pictured it more as Knockaert in a free role behind the strikers with DD and King sitting behind. I think Dyer would do fine as a LWB with the cover of Miquel behind him. I was wary of the type of wing backs. When we've played it before with two genuine full backs as wing backs it's been a very restrictive system. I felt one full back and one winger would give a better balance to the side. I think if your going 2 wing backs with Moore and Dyer and Knocky in a free role behind the front 2 Surely our midfield is left with King and Drinky! Just a little exposed when Watford try and play the Spain way with 5 or even 6 in midfield with no striker at times.Our midfield would be outrun.My opinion is there has to be 3 across the middle for this with King,Drinky,And Hammond or James with Moore and Konch providing cover on the flanks.I could be wrong.This just goes to prove what comp for places there is in the squad atm,and how versatile our systems can be now.Only last season we were saying there was no plan B.Now it seems we have countless options. Whatever our formation and team we go with chances are at this min in time the Watford fans are bricking it a bit more than ours! Get a result, any result, anyhow, and keep the run going,confidence must be sky high in the dressing room.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.