Mjeb Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Why haven't we taken players off Cardiff , Fulham , Norwich ? - Looks like we could do with a couple buys / loans , we look paper thin. In some areas , eg with James and drinky getting injured . If we lost a centre back like Moore or our Captain fantastic . I hope we move quickly , choices we get less and less , the longer we leave it , and prices go up
Unabomber Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Prob for the same reason peeps don't put spaces between commas/full stops, it's unnecessary.
Kitchandro Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Why haven't we taken players off Cardiff , Fulham , Norwich ? Because they were shit & got relegated? Just a thought.
HEGGSY Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Why haven't we taken players off Cardiff , Fulham , Norwich ? Because there's a reason they all went down? There's a reason Fulham have lost their 3 opening games, I dunno.
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Remember when Tottenham had done great deals in the transfer market last year? How did that end up. Nobody can really judge anything until at least Christmas, if not the end of the season.
Fox92 Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 It's very easy saying we need him, him and him in this position here, here and here. But it's very hard going to get those players. I wouldn't panic if I was you. QPR have done this before. And ok, they might have a couple decent signings, but I wouldn't want Nige to rip through the squad with 7 signings and 3 loans. Doesn't say much to the current players does it? Nigel operates very coy, we all know this, it's the right this to do. He will get the right player(s) in the end, he always does.
65RosesFox Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Well they did finish 22 points behind us so they need to really.
stevelcfc Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 It's all about their mentality, relegated players are losers and we want/need winners to stay up. Also their demands would be high as they will want to cash in and their abilities don't match.
Onions Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Our best business was, Keeping Pearson, Vardy and Nugent. Too many teams come up change their team, pay "stars" £70,000 a week, and then fail. I remember the last time we went down, we had serious wage issues, and the club was reasonably close to going bust, I never want to see that again, and yes we have rich owners right now, but football is a business, and as grateful as I am to them, we can't expect them to be here in 5 years time if it goes tits up
SMX11 Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Well lets be honest if they didn't seriously strengthen they would have been a laughing stock.
leicesterisme Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Just remember 2 of QPR's 4 centre backs are Clint Hill & Richard Dunne.
Guest ttfn Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Anyone remember that transfer window when QPR signed Junior Hoilett, Esteban Granero and Julio Cesar?
lcfcsnow Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Just remember 2 of QPR's 4 centre backs are Clint Hill & Richard Dunne. We can hardly talk there.
Jace Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 So we want to stay up in the Premiership so you think we should buy players that are proven not to be good enough for the Premiership?
65RosesFox Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Also he's not doing the best business on the pitch, where it matters. It's only one game, but you need to beating the likes of Hull at home.
Ghost Troop Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 7Harry may have been the busiest but until this legion of stars actually kicks a ball or two I'll reserve judgement on it being the best business. Are you 11?
GingerrrFox Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 So we want to stay up in the Premiership so you think we should buy players that are proven not to be good enough for the Premiership? There are players though from Cardiff, Fulham and Norwich who you could say are good enough for this league though. Gary Medel, Nathan Redmond, Steven Caulker, Leroy Fer etc. Just because a team is relegated doesn't mean that automatically every single player is bad and can't meet the Premiership standard.
Wasyls Pec Deck Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 Harry signs players for the sake of it - always has, always will (and he often takes a slice of the deal...) Whereas we have a manager who operates with integrity and repeatedly talks about signing the right player for the group. This requires a lot more homework than the scattergun 'Arry approach, hence why we are probably a bit more fussy.
Jace Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 There are players though from Cardiff, Fulham and Norwich who you could say are good enough for this league though. Gary Medel, Nathan Redmond, Steven Caulker, Leroy Fer etc. Just because a team is relegated doesn't mean that automatically every single player is bad and can't meet the Premiership standard. I'd rather give our players who got us promoted a chance first
sylofox Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 This is so easy to answer it is lol They don't opperate with a budget. They have a proven prem manager. They now also have an ex prem/England manager as number two. Oh and they are based in London.
Legend_in_blue Posted 21 August 2014 Posted 21 August 2014 He can bring in who he wants, he still doesn't have a team ethic running through his side. He'll be gone by January.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.