Dickov22 Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Dickov22 Actually doesn't want what's best for the team. Fvcking ridiculous. Why don't i?
Harry - LCFC Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Why don't i? You'd rather see Moore start, the lesser performer of the two, than Wasilewski
Dickov22 Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 You'd rather see Moore start, the lesser performer of the two, than Wasilewski To be honest I don't think either are good enough at this level but at least Moore won't be a walking red card. It's subjective anyway, clearly Pearson thought Moore was the better option up until now. Does that mean he doesn't want what's best for the team? Everyone's allowed an opinion
AndWhat? Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 was posted in the shut up Berahino thread here it is Is that seriously it? This whole thread over that? He barely touched him!
ScouseFox Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 honestly if he gets a ban over that the game has gone. i took a worse elbow trying to get from my seat to the toilet at half time.
Witch Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Is that seriously it? This whole thread over that? He barely touched him! Yet some people here called Wasyl an animal and a disgrace. I almost expected he attempted to behead Berahino with his elbow, or something.
Narborough_fox Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 If Wasyl gets a ban for that after Aguero didn't get one after his tackle at the West Ham game I give up.
st albans fox Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Anyone know the timescale for FA announcement ? Would have thought it has to be by noon tomorrow to allow clubs to plan for next match
ImBlue Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Anyone got a video? Edit, major over reaction and if he gets a ban for that it will be utter b*llocks. It's a foul, and a yellow at best, but even that's debatable.
Lionheart Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Every team needs a nasty f****r and he is ours it puts a bit of fear into the opposing forwards which isn't a bad thing,unfortunately he did mean it and I reckon he'll be found guilty and get a ban.We do need him definitely he has got far more to his game than the hard bit.
ScouseFox Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 will face no action according to john percy on twitter. quite right too. berahino should face action for being a massive pussy imo
Harry - LCFC Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Got away with one here and quiet word from the manager wouldn't go amiss. I'm sure Was can think of other ways to intimidate the opposition.
reynard Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Where was the ref with this one? I'm pretty sure he saw it and took no action? Or did he give us a free kick for a blatent push by their player? Could be wrong though. I didn't notice it during play. It doesn't look clever but doesn't look that bad either in my opinion.
TheUltimateWinner Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 I preferred it when he clattered one of their players off the ball whilst running back from a corner.
65RosesFox Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 I preferred it when he clattered one of their players off the ball whilst running back from a corner. I liked that... Kamikaze Wasyl mode. Then straight after that went in hard on a 50/50 won the ball and got studded in the shin,but carried on, didn't flinch or moan. He's what we've been missing.
jimmer Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Leicester-City-defender-Marcin-Wasilewski-charged/story-24042764-detail/story.html?
Donut Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Hes escaped a ban........this time. But there will be an increased awareness around him now from referees, opposition players and the media that this is one of his "dark side" traits as a player, and he really does need to get rid of it, or this will rear its head again at some point, and usually the worst time when it might cost a game.
65RosesFox Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Sorry to be pedantic but the name of the thread should be changed as 'gets away with it' suggests he did something wrong.....
Gary Eatfood Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 The title of this thread needs amending. He didn't get away with anything because he didn't do anything wrong. Just good solid defending.
Stadt Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 If the FA have not found him guilty then he's not 'gotten away with it' because it's not a foul.
ealingfox Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Well if he does that exact same thing 100 times the authorities can only come to that conclusion again and again. He'll 'get away with it' 100 times. Just accept he is an artist. What a don.
Raj Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 the dumbos calling wasyl now look rather silly eh? Well done FA..who said your a bunch of old farts?!!!
Nalis Posted 3 November 2014 Posted 3 November 2014 Is that seriously it? This whole thread over that? He barely touched him! My thoughts exactly!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.