theessexfox Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 Let me point out that I said "one of our worst players". Given that we didn't win in 12 games, there weren't many candidates for the 'star' player. This forum spaffs it's knickers whenever he flicks his hair. It's a biased view. Easy to say "he was the one that looked like doing something" but it's no good when you don't actually do anything I'd be amazed to learn if he made a successful pass in the Swansea game. Yes he got on the ball a lot, but he gave it away on every occasion. He didn't 'make' the Liverpool goal. Leo's persistence did. We scored 8 goals in 12 games and we think our 'creative player' was the star performer? Come on lads, it's not rocket science. May have been poor in the Swansea game but HE WAS VOTED MOTM BY THIS FORUM And Leo has a tough time scoring that if Mahrez doesn't slide it through to him And you said he was one of our worst players on that run, well he was VOTED MOTM BY THIS FORUM the most times in that run without playing, the evidence is suggesting you're wrong.
peach0000 Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 It would be interesting to know who has the highest average rating on the match ratings vote
AKCJ Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 i think kingfox has hacked his account. is that right, akcj? i can't think of a reasonable explanation for you to have suddenly turned into a full on retard. Ouch. Look, i'm only saying that our so-called creative spark was poor during our bad run. He scored one and assisted (off the top of my head) two. I know he's exciting to watch, and he was in our bad run. But he didn't deliver and at the end of the day, that's what you have to do at this level. I think players like Ulloa, Wasyl and Cambiasso were our best three performers in our bad run. The rest of the team might well not have bothered.
The Doctor Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 Ouch. Look, i'm only saying that our so-called creative spark was poor during our bad run. He scored one and assisted (off the top of my head) two. I know he's exciting to watch, and he was in our bad run. But he didn't deliver and at the end of the day, that's what you have to do at this level. I think players like Ulloa, Wasyl and Cambiasso were our best three performers in our bad run. The rest of the team might well not have bothered. But you see that's where you're wrong - he did deliver. Attacking players have a bargain with each other, creative ones create chances for the goalscorers to put away. If the creative player gives the goalscorer 10 chances, and the goalscorer doesn't finish any of them, the creative player has delivered on his side of the bargain, the goalscorer hasn't though...
lgfualol Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 He has created lots. Unfortunately most of his through balls go to Vardy.
kingfox Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 May have been poor in the Swansea game but HE WAS VOTED MOTM BY THIS FORUM And Leo has a tough time scoring that if Mahrez doesn't slide it through to him And you said he was one of our worst players on that run, well he was VOTED MOTM BY THIS FORUM the most times in that run without playing, the evidence is suggesting you're wrong. They vote for him through favouritism even though he may have been average. Getting voted MOTM against Sunderland especially was a massive joke. When he's good he's good, but like AKCJ has said he has also had quite a few mediocre performances.
AKCJ Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 But you see that's where you're wrong - he did deliver. Attacking players have a bargain with each other, creative ones create chances for the goalscorers to put away. If the creative player gives the goalscorer 10 chances, and the goalscorer doesn't finish any of them, the creative player has delivered on his side of the bargain, the goalscorer hasn't though... This is like pulling teeth... How dare I even think about disrespecting him?! Leo has one of the best shots to goals ratios in the league. We didn't give him enough chances in our bad run and that's all there really is to it.
AKCJ Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 KingFox, please don't agree with me. You're ruining my argument.
kingfox Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 KingFox, please don't agree with me. You're ruining my argument. They have been through all of this with myself, you won't get anywhere because they are that deluded.
ScouseFox Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 when the only person you can find on the forum to agree with you is kingfox a seven day ban (minimum) is in order imho
sylofox Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 when the only person you can find on the forum to agree with you is kingfox a seven day ban (minimum) is in order imho I have no chance then even kingfox disagrees with me lol kingfox will now agree I am finished.
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 Liverpool - Did he touch the ball? This is a joke, yeah? It must be a joke. Yeah, it's a joke.
SecretPro Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 Some people like to dislike or not rate our best players because for some reason they think it makes them superior/more knowledgable/a better more dedicated fan/insightful. It's always the same and it's zzzZZZZZZZ. People deliberately swimming against the tide just because they don't want to be a 'sheep' even though the sheep is where it's at. Happens in all walks of life.
The Doctor Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 This is like pulling teeth... How dare I even think about disrespecting him?! Leo has one of the best shots to goals ratios in the league. We didn't give him enough chances in our bad run and that's all there really is to it. Because he played withdrawn with Vardy up top - who missed how many 1v1's?
kingfox Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 when the only person you can find on the forum to agree with you is kingfox a seven day ban (minimum) is in order imho I have no chance then even kingfox disagrees with me lol kingfox will now agree I am finished. Now now spread a bit of love, deep down you know my posts are realistic.
Guest LCFC_World Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 Hamer, Wasilewski, Ulloa, Mahrez and Hammond have all stood out for me.
Dan Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 Slowly edging towards Wasilewski. Mahrez, Ulloa & Hammond all deserve mentions too.
shailen Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 If Mahrez had more of an end product he would not be playing for us. If anyone cannot see how good he is, and the potential he has then you shouldn't be commenting on football.
Oxfordfox83 Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 Mahrez is our most dangerous attacking outlet, but he's been best in the last handful of games when he's not trying to do too much. Now he makes enough chances per game that we can afford to miss one or two-in our slump he was as guilty as anyone of running into blind alleys. If it had been Knockaert doing the same he'd have been pissed on for not passing early enough. He's our best player, but he's only been playing well for him in the last 6/7. Schlupp is the most pleasing performer this season for me-he's done a Dyer over the last few games-more reliable on the ball and starting to make the opposition worry. He's flawed, but improving and starting to make a real difference. Also our second top scorer (not hard, but still...) Hope the ACON doesn't ruin his season...
RUDZY Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 SCHLUPP HAMMOND WASILEWSKI HAMER MORGAN MAHREZ ULLOA NUGENT
Grewks Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 It depends what you mean. Most outstanding player? Most Consistent player? Most important player?
Fox42 Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 Ulloa for me. Scores goals and is a great technical player; gritty, strong and plays a massive part defensively.
TheLittleBigMan Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 Schlupps done well for us, really pleased for the lad and there's plenty more to come.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.