Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Phube

Crazy Stat Time!

By Phube, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Nalis

Nalis

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Dan LCFC said:

Along similar lines to the earliest red card and win stat, but Wes Morgan's goal from the bench was apparently the longest amount of time after coming on as a sub that they've sccored in Premier League history.

I'd say that could even be a record in top flight history, cant realistically see there being a bigger gap barring a freak early injury to a striker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Maul

Ted Maul

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, lildave3 said:

Not misleading is it, it literally says directly from a free kick.

Well it is, isn't it. Most people would class those goals as 'scoring from a free-kick', direct from the dead ball or not- Ferdinand scored 3, so it's a pointless stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ted Maul said:

Well it is, isn't it. Most people would class those goals as 'scoring from a free-kick', direct from the dead ball or not- Ferdinand scored 3, so it's a pointless stat.

But nodbody would call Ferdinand’s goals as scoring directly from a free kick though would they? That’s what the stat says.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Maul

Ted Maul

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

But nodbody would call Ferdinand’s goals as scoring directly from a free kick though would they? That’s what the stat says.

My point is that nobody would specify 'direct from a free kick'. Surely most people would just say 'scored a free kick', regardless of whether someone had tapped the ball or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KrefelderFox666

KrefelderFox666

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, Nalis said:

I'd say that could even be a record in top flight history, cant realistically see there being a bigger gap barring a freak early injury to a striker.

And you would have to have scored extremely late in the game. And subs have only existed since the 70s or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Ted Maul said:

My point is that nobody would specify 'direct from a free kick'. Surely most people would just say 'scored a free kick', regardless of whether someone had tapped the ball or not?

Apparently they would though. That's what the tweet says.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Maul

Ted Maul

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

Apparently they would though. That's what the tweet says.

I just find it strange that they would tweet it lol I suppose 'scored from a free kick without the ball being nudged to one side by a teammate first' doesn't have the same ring to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phube

Phube

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Ted Maul said:

I just find it strange that they would tweet it lol I suppose 'scored from a free kick without the ball being nudged to one side by a teammate first' doesn't have the same ring to it.

 

One could maybe find an easy way to say it... like ‘directly’.

 

The point of the stat is that lots of goals are scored indirectly from free-kicks/corners. But not many City players have had the skill to do a Beckham (or any other quality free kick specialist you’d care to name) from a set piece... not even Guppy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Maul

Ted Maul

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Phube said:

 

One could maybe find an easy way to say it... like ‘directly’.

 

The point of the stat is that lots of goals are scored indirectly from free-kicks/corners. But not many City players have had the skill to do a Beckham (or any other quality free kick specialist you’d care to name) from a set piece... not even Guppy!

It's the way it's written- it discounts Ferdinand's 3, despite there being very little difference in my eyes. I'm being pedantic, but it's a pedantic stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tom27111

tom27111

Posted
Posted

Theres not really anything pedantic about it. If you score direct from a corner, that's always stated. However, if a corner is swung in and headed in, it's not direct from a corner.

 

Same with a free kick. If its nudged, it's not direct from a free kick.

 

To demonstrate that, check the laws of the game, if you have an indirect free kick in the area, it has to be touched before someone can score. Therefore not directly scored from a free kick.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Ted Maul said:

It's the way it's written- it discounts Ferdinand's 3, despite there being very little difference in my eyes. I'm being pedantic, but it's a pedantic stat.

The ball is passed to him and he shoots. Doesn't matter how far the pass travels, it's a pass and therefore it's not a shot direct from the free-kick. With reference to the post above about corners, if you take a short corner, the player receives it, shoots and scores, it's not a goal direct from the corner.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ted Maul

Ted Maul

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Guest said:

The ball is passed to him and he shoots. Doesn't matter how far the pass travels, it's a pass and therefore it's not a shot direct from the free-kick. With reference to the post above about corners, if you take a short corner, the player receives it, shoots and scores, it's not a goal direct from the corner.

I'd always just consider a goal from someone stood over the ball scoring from a free kick, whether someone has nudged it to him or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trav Le Bleu

Trav Le Bleu

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Guest said:

The ball is passed to him and he shoots. Doesn't matter how far the pass travels, it's a pass and therefore it's not a shot direct from the free-kick. With reference to the post above about corners, if you take a short corner, the player receives it, shoots and scores, it's not a goal direct from the corner.

Excellently argued. :appl:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Actually, on second thoughts, and muddying the waters somewhat, a stat titled, "goals from corners", would be headers, volleys and maybe mad scrambles following a corner, rather than directly from a corner. :dunno:

It would, but the stat in reference to Maddison was "goals directly from free-kicks". If we got a free-kick in a wide area, crossed it in and scored, you could reasonably describe that as being a goal from a free-kick, but not a goal direct from a free-kick. I think. Similarly a header, volley, scramble etc. is a goal from a corner but not a goal direct from a corner. Direct to me implies it goes straight from the boot of the first player to touch the ball into the goal - allowing for deflections and so on. It is a pedantic way of looking at it but in my mind at least there's a clear distinction.

 

I think it's more mud than water at this point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trav Le Bleu

Trav Le Bleu

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Guest said:

It would, but the stat in reference to Maddison was "goals directly from free-kicks". If we got a free-kick in a wide area, crossed it in and scored, you could reasonably describe that as being a goal from a free-kick, but not a goal direct from a free-kick. I think. Similarly a header, volley, scramble etc. is a goal from a corner but not a goal direct from a corner. Direct to me implies it goes straight from the boot of the first player to touch the ball into the goal - allowing for deflections and so on. It is a pedantic way of looking at it but in my mind at least there's a clear distinction.

 

I think it's more mud than water at this point.

Yeah, as you notice, I went back and corrected myself having re-read the original stat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...