foxfanazer Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Battle of the bottlers has been boring so far
FireFox Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 They don't need end product though. Just drag defenders out and feed the ball to Eriksen to do some magic.As I said. But Kane is way off form.
Alf Bentley Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 13 minutes ago, foxes21 said: Spurs playing a 3-4-3 of sorts. But Rose & Walker have no end product to play this formation. According to The Standard, Arsenal are playing 7-2-1 and Spurs are playing 5-5-0. No wonder the match is still goalless, the negative defensive bastards... 0 Arsenal FC (7-2-1) 0 Tottenham Hotspur (5-5-0) 1 2 ARS 0 0 TOT 0 0 22' 1st Half TOT 6' - K Wimmer ARS 0 - 0 22' TOT
Wymsey Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Welbeck still injured or gone stale out the side?
TheUltimateWinner Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Seeing Tottenham doing that shirt pulling makes me fvcking sick after the penalty they got given against us for our 'physicality'
Matt Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 1 minute ago, Wymeswold fox said: Welbeck still injured or gone stale out the side? He plays for Arsenal, you do the maths.
Mark_w Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Arsenal create some great chances, can't score. Tottenham players scored a brilliant own goal. Then they fight. That pretty perfectly sums up their rivalry.
foxfanazer Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Hate both of them but enjoy seeing spurs lose more.
RowlattsFox Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Surely that should be offside? That's where the rule is stupid of waiting for the player to touch the ball.
TheMightySystem Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Just now, RowlattsFox said: Surely that should be offside? That's where the rule is stupid of waiting for the player to touch the ball. Think it's now if the offside player effects play in anyway such as distracting a defender so in that case yes it should have been offside as Wimmer wouldn't have headed it.
Jimothy Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Just now, TheMightySystem said: Think it's now if the offside player effects play in anyway such as distracting a defender so in that case yes it should have been offside as Wimmer wouldn't have headed it. But Koscielny wasn't offside. So if you remove Sanchez from that situation Wimmer would still have gone for the header because he'd have still been trying to stop Koscielny.
TheMightySystem Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Just now, Facecloth said: But Koscielny wasn't offside. So if you remove Sanchez from that situation Wimmer would still have gone for the header because he'd have still been trying to stop Koscielny. Fair enough, couldn't quite tell on my stream but the commentators said both were offside. If one was onside though then it stands.
weller54 Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Wimmerway! Wimmerway Wimmerway.. Arry 's Lions sleep tonight. .
RowlattsFox Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 If you are offside from a dead ball then it should be given as offside, regardless of whether you're interfering or not. IMO anyway.
foxfanazer Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 Really tough call but it's quite ridiculous that still the offside rule isisn't clear
foxes21 Posted 6 November 2016 Posted 6 November 2016 nice bit of karma for spurs this week with that offside goal, after the penalty and all those dives & soft free kicks against us last week
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.