Guest Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 1 hour ago, Realist Guy In The Room said: Maybe because he probably wouldn't add that much to the team. He certainly wouldn't start and there's nothing to suggest he'd be any better than Leo. This would be a waste of a squad place imo. Everything I've seen of him says he would be a great addition to the squad and better than Leo.
TJB-fox Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 8 minutes ago, FIF said: Everything I've seen of him says he would be a great addition to the squad and better than Leo. How about scoring goals in the English /premier league? Has Slimani scored more than 12 goals in a season over here?
Guest Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 1 minute ago, TJB-fox said: How about scoring goals in the English /premier league? Has Slimani scored more than 12 goals in a season over here? Stupid question. I think he's scored as many as Messi.
Realist Guy In The Room Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 13 minutes ago, FIF said: Stupid question. I think he's scored as many as Messi. Not wanting to be confrontational here but the fact is there are limited squad players and as has been pointed out, we know that if Leo comes in he's reliable. It seems a bit of a pointless exercise to spend that sort of cash on a player that may or may not be any better. I've watched some highlights of games he's played in and whilst its not a massive gauge of his ability, I cant say I was massively impressed. if we're going to sign another striker, he needs to be the mustard, not the low fat marg.
sphericalfox Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 3 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said: Not wanting to be confrontational here but the fact is there are limited squad players and as has been pointed out, we know that if Leo comes in he's reliable. It seems a bit of a pointless exercise to spend that sort of cash on a player that may or may not be any better. I've watched some highlights of games he's played in and whilst its not a massive gauge of his ability, I cant say I was massively impressed. if we're going to sign another striker, he needs to be the mustard, not the low fat marg. Mustard or Dijon, for me if he adds to the squad and enables us to retain Mahrez, then it'll be worth every penny.
TJB-fox Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 27 minutes ago, FIF said: Stupid question. I think he's scored as many as Messi. I'm winding you up mate chill out
Sharpe's Fox Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 Might be better than Leo might not but what we do know is Leo has a really sexy soul patch and this cvnt doesn't.
chapero82 Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 26 minutes ago, st albans fox said: Apparently it's West Ham ( It was West Ham who put in the bud really wished it was us
ARM1968 Posted 5 August 2016 Posted 5 August 2016 I can. Captain of the Black pearl no less. Arghhh!!!
MPH Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 7 hours ago, Realist Guy In The Room said: Not wanting to be confrontational here but the fact is there are limited squad players and as has been pointed out, we know that if Leo comes in he's reliable. It seems a bit of a pointless exercise to spend that sort of cash on a player that may or may not be any better. I've watched some highlights of games he's played in and whilst its not a massive gauge of his ability, I cant say I was massively impressed. if we're going to sign another striker, he needs to be the mustard, not the low fat marg. Well with with that mentality, how can we ever sign anyone ever again?
Realist Guy In The Room Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 4 hours ago, MPH said: Well with with that mentality, how can we ever sign anyone ever again? By signing players obviously better than we have.
TMELcfc Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 14 hours ago, artursteppe said: I think you will find that it was 30M Euros (about £23M). I do not think it has gone up, if in fact it does still exist, of course. Sorry yes €30mil. What he was getting at was that Sporting technically can ask for even more...
Guest Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 1 hour ago, Realist Guy In The Room said: By signing players obviously better than we have. Who have socred in the prem. duh!!
Guest Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 1 hour ago, lcfceaves said: Sorry yes €30mil. What he was getting at was that Sporting technically can ask for even more... Or take less for a want away striker.
The whole world smiles Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 I think we have enough strikers now ulloa proved last season what a good option he is from the bench. We sign someone like Silimani he would expect to play and that would upset the balance of the squad.
Guest Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 1 hour ago, The whole world smiles said: I think we have enough strikers now ulloa proved last season what a good option he is from the bench. We sign someone like Silimani he would expect to play and that would upset the balance of the squad. I like Ulloa as a bench option but slimani is a higher class - and he should expect to play. If we want european football again next season he's the type of signing we need.
MPH Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 2 hours ago, Realist Guy In The Room said: By signing players obviously better than we have. My point stands. there was no way we could prove vardy, mahrez, Kante were better than we had. Plus a bunch of others we have signed...
Wymsey Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 If this guy comes, the team will have a Christian and a Islam. Will need someone called Budda next to please the churches etc further imo.
sphericalfox Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 4 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said: If this guy comes, the team will have a Christian and a Islam. Will need someone called Budda next to please the churches further imo. er, Christians are the only ones who have dem churchy-tings.
MPH Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 4 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said: If this guy comes, the team will have a Christian and a Islam. Will need someone called Budda next to please the churches further imo. Haha and how will signing a Buddhist please the churches? It will probably please the Buddhist temples, though
whitlock Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 With us chasing Deeney earlier on in the season, I'm surprised we wouldn't be after him, especially after being linked with him before too.
Guest Posted 6 August 2016 Posted 6 August 2016 14 minutes ago, sphericalfox said: er, Christians are the only ones who have dem churchy-tings. But they all Drinkwater.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.