Mark_w Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 1 minute ago, ktfox59 said: Sky bet 2/1 For those of us unfamiliar with odds what does that realistically mean? Can I start celebrating?
Foxxed Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 The prequels to the original franchise will be Pearson's son ****ing prostitutes, of course.
SecretPro Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 2 minutes ago, Mark_w said: For those of us unfamiliar with odds what does that realistically mean? Can I start celebrating? It means the bookies base their odds on tabloid headlines.
Mark_w Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 Just now, SecretPro said: It means the bookies base their odds on tabloid headlines. Damn.
ktfox59 Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 1 minute ago, Mark_w said: For those of us unfamiliar with odds what does that realistically mean? Can I start celebrating? I guess the odds are the law of probability of something happening. But also probably not true. Just that everyone else has drifted alarmingly with that betting co pany
Tuna Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 23 minutes ago, Sharpe's Fox said: If Murdoch is right on this one I'll personally walk round Liverpool city centre in a Thatcher mask flogging his papers for him. It would be like the sandwich board scene in Die Hard With A Vengeance.
erlee Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 19 hours ago, STUHILL said: So the owners not only asked these so called senior players whether they should sack Claudio, but they are also asking them who should be the next manager too?! Yeh ok then... Guess headlines like that sell papers though i don't think that's too far fetched.. some company management/owners make the same mistake,, i was with one. The owners started talking to the ground staff & begun to sideline the manager. The manager felt betrayed - moreover the staff stopped respecting the manager & the whole staff-command-structure just went pear shaped. The owners should never have to go down to staff level to get information. NEVER DIRECTLY SEEN TO BE DOING THIS - there are other ways!! If they don't have their spies at this level of the game == you're just another asian bloke owning QPR. If you have to ask who the players want as their manager - it's game over! If they lose to Liverfool i am predicting a drop.
sylofox Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 14 minutes ago, STUHILL said: So the owners not only asked these so called senior players whether they should sack Claudio, but they are also asking them who should be the next manager too?! Yeh ok then... Guess headlines like that sell papers though No thats the suns take on it. As I understand it and posted friday night. The question was asked if they (the owners) would have NP back. The reply was if he applied they would talk to him.
FoxoCube Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 I'd take Pearson back in a heart beat, as long as he can persuade walshy to come back too. Then once he's rebuilt the foundations and got the players working as a unit... we could rehire ranieri?
sdb Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 I did love him but he was barely good enough for this level. He's not been good enough for the level below since, and his PR skills were nothing short of embarrassing. Would be a backward step imo.
STUHILL Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 1 minute ago, erlee said: i don't think that's too far fetched.. some company management/owners make the same mistake,, i was with one. The owners started talking to the ground staff & begun to sideline the manager. The manager felt betrayed - moreover the staff stopped respecting the manager & the whole staff-command-structure just went pear shaped. The owners should never have to go down to staff level to get information. NEVER DIRECTLY SEEN TO BE DOING THIS - there are other ways!! If they don't have their spies at this level of the game == you're just another asian bloke owning QPR. If you have to ask who the players want as their manager - it's game over! If they lose to Liverfool i am predicting a drop. Personally, I will take Kasper's words over that of the media "sources" any day! I don't know Kasper personally, but hearing him talk and seeing how he conducts himself, I don't doubt that what he said in that interview is 100% true. He said that none of the players had any say in what happened with Claudio. Add to that, the posts from Vardy and Albrighton's Mrs etc.. I think this was purely the owners sacking a Manager that has been woeful for 8 months and would take us down. If you think the owners are asking the players who they want to be manager, then fair enough, but I highly doubt that has any truth in it.
erlee Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 19 hours ago, FoxoCube said: I'd take Pearson back in a heart beat, as long as he can persuade walshy to come back too. Then once he's rebuilt the foundations and got the players working as a unit... we could rehire ranieri? seems legit
The_77 Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 Preki will hold a press conference at the King Power before Nige.
Harry - LCFC Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 Can't see it happening due to way he departed last time. I think the arguments being made against him aren't particularly good mind. We need someone 'fresh'? Why? He's a got a track record of success with these players and built this club up when he was last here.
STUHILL Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 3 minutes ago, FoxoCube said: I'd take Pearson back in a heart beat, as long as he can persuade walshy to come back too. Then once he's rebuilt the foundations and got the players working as a unit... we could rehire ranieri? I think he has really struggled without Walsh. Derby was a disaster as he again fell out with owners. I do think he could help rebuild us again, similar to what he did after Sven's messy spending spree. If we can attract Managers with the pedigree of Hiddink or Mancini though, then I would like to go that route. If someone like Hiddink can't keep us up and we go down, then we could look at Pearson for a complete rebuild in the Championship, as that seems to be what he does best.
foxes21 Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 what about two co-managers? not heard of these days although Iceland had co-managers in the euros, but what about pearson & shakey as co-managers, then shakey can do the pr/conference stuff instead of ostrich lover Pearson.
wurmer Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 If that man ends up in charge of the club again, I shan't give them another penny of my cash until he is inevitably sacked again.
ktfox59 Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 Someone may??????? Know something. Odds plummeting everywhere now another firm5/2 fro around 5/1
foxes21 Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 3 minutes ago, wurmer said: If that man ends up in charge of the club again, I shan't give them another penny of my cash until he is inevitably sacked again. I dont understand this view. Pearson is one of our most successful ever managers. But fans get their knickers in a twist because he trolled some journo's.
The_77 Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 5 minutes ago, ktfox59 said: Someone may??????? Know something. Odds plummeting everywhere now another firm5/2 fro around 5/1 Because people are probably reading that article and placing bets.
Johnthefoxrayner Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 1 hour ago, FireFox said: So this was legit? The club needs to move on. They sack CR and them take Pearson back disgraceful IMO. And if Pearson did a crap job would they consider taking CR back I don't think so. Let's move on and get someone fresh in
ktfox59 Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 1 minute ago, The_77 said: Because people are probably reading that article and placing bets. You are probably right. Sky bet dropped to 2/1 couple of hours ago, when others 4 5 6s. But how many times have we seen this pop a tenner on odds tumble before? Lots!
STUHILL Posted 26 February 2017 Posted 26 February 2017 2 minutes ago, foxes21 said: I dont understand this view. Pearson is one of our most successful ever managers. But fans get their knickers in a twist because he trolled some journo's. I have to agree. Even the thing with his son doesn't change my view on him! His son should never have been at the club though as was clearly not good enough and only here because of his Daddy! If we can't get managers like Hiddink, Mancini or O'Neill, and are left with the likes of Pardew and Redknapp, then I would prefer Pearson too tbh. Can't see it happening though. The odds are usually way off at this stage and the media of course will be jumping all over such a sensational rumour as this!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.