Max Power Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Owngoalnigeria why have you forsaken me?????? I trusted you lads ffs
ClaphamFox Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 2 minutes ago, Adster said: More clickbait shite. Of course the header of the article would state that, but then they contradict themselves from the final paragraph: It's not really a contradiction. Being 'under threat' doesn't mean it won't happen. But yes, they're probably over-egging the level of 'threat' to generate clicks.
Adster Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Just now, ClaphamFox said: It's not really a contradiction. Being 'under threat' doesn't mean it won't happen. But yes, they're probably over-egging the level of 'threat' to generate clicks. Yeah that's it, the title was a bit OTT. They probably did it because they wanted to see @SheppyFox's reaction
Unclenobhead Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 What a load of old bollax!!! What has football come to? ? I'm bored with this now, I'm going to stop reading this crap and just take my seat at the first home game of the season and see who turns up on the pitch then I reckon. ?
ClaphamFox Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Just now, Unclenobhead said: What a load of old bollax!!! What has football come to? ? I'm bored with this now, I'm going to stop reading this crap and just going to take my seat at the first home game of the season and see who turns up on the pitch then I reckon. ? You're not though, are you?
Unclenobhead Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Yes I am actually, I work night just woke up to squirt Bert and check my phone. When I get up later I won't look I promise ?
ClaphamFox Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 4 minutes ago, Unclenobhead said: Yes I am actually, I work night just woke up to squirt Bert and check my phone. When I get up later I won't look I promise ? Moral fibre. Impressive!
foxinsocks Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Look - -it is clear he wants to come here. I am sure Lcfc will co-operate with the holder of his image rights... I expect that this will be clarified in time by the transfer of money between the various managing companies. It is not our fight and as his new employer we would be in no different a situation than man city are currently.
urban.spaceman Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Look if we need to have a whip-round for his former agents then so be it.
Clever Fox Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 i can see this one making a new record for posts. May even reach 200 pages.
Wolfox Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 18 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said: It's not really a contradiction. Being 'under threat' doesn't mean it won't happen. But yes, they're probably over-egging the level of 'threat' to generate clicks. Come on…. Fess up…. Who clicked???
brucey Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 hopefully we hold off on any Slim/Leo deals until this is resolved at least if we ain't getting him, Spurs aren't either
FrankieADZ Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 1 minute ago, Clever Fox said: i can see this one making a new record for posts. May even reach 200 pages. how many pages did the Maynard thread get to again? Im sure all this lark with image rights will be sorted soon,hopefully we'll get this over the line before the PL Asia stuff
Unclenobhead Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 11 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said: Moral fibre. Impressive! Cheers mate,I'm logging out now see you all in September when all this shit is over. #stickaforkinmeimdone. See you all then ?
AjcW Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Pretty ridiculous that a player who was in a youth side only a season ago is having a dispute over image rights
Guest Papasmurf Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 1 minute ago, AjcW said: Pretty ridiculous that a player who was in a youth side only a season ago is having a dispute over image rights I was thinking the same. However, when he bangs in 25 goals a season for the next 2 seasons he will want to have something more rewarding in place.
Guest Papasmurf Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 1 minute ago, AKCJ said: Don't you just ****ing hate agents? Let's go back to the old days when clubs used to fleece stupid footballers.
dpjfox Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Not sure of the implications but he lost a court case today regarding "image rights", delaying the deal but hopefully problems can be sorted
Foxxed Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Image rights? Are they worried about our shade of blue? Or is this an elaborate version of "I know how to use the courts to shaft you. Cough up some money dickheads. My third yacht won't pay for itself"?
MPH Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 48 minutes ago, Adster said: More clickbait shite. Of course the header of the article would state that, but then they contradict themselves from the final paragraph: Overused phrase and Unfair on this occasion. they actually had news to share.
Adster Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Just now, MPH said: Overused phrase and Unfair on this occasion. they actually had news to share. They did have news to share, but the OTT title was completely un-necessary and was a blatant attempt to generate more clicks that it would of if they'd of just said what was the truth.
Ashley Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Some one sum up what the **** image rights mean please and thank you
Marutimon Posted 12 July 2017 Posted 12 July 2017 Don't know the intricacies of the deal, but how can a guy be held hostage on image rights on any deal signed before he was an adult? If this is legal than something is really messed up with the system.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.