Jimbo Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Sky reporting that the deal will only go through if Drinkwater joins chelsea. Sounds like we're waiting for Chelsea to up their offer first. Thought it was too good to be true,was going far too smoothly
Long Eaton Fox Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Sky imply that Silva will only sign if Danny signs for chelsea. Well I think you can't have enough of a good thing and we should sign Silva regardless.
Aeropars Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Sky reporting that this will only go through if Drinkwater leaves.
Robin JD Popley Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 I am glad I am not alone in thinking, Why don't we just sign him if Drinky goes or stays? Literally be so like us not to do a deal with it almost there.
FoxyPalace.com Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 £15 million is a steal buy him even if Danny does not leave.
Kp1984 Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Sky sports news silva will sign for Leicester but only will happen if Chelsea can agree a fee for drink water
Jimbo Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Just now, lanefox said: Is this down to ffp? Must be
Kitchandro Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Either we want him or we don't. Signing him only if Drinky goes just highlights our crap approach to this market. Ridiculous. What if Drinkwater stays - do we not want to improve our midfield then?
Innovindil Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Just now, lanefox said: Is this down to ffp? Can't be, we should be well in the green with the cl money from last year.
whoareyaaa Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 2 minutes ago, benpicko said: 'Sky Sports News understands Leicester will only complete the Adrien Silva deal, IF Danny Drinkwater leaves for Chelsea before tonight's 11pm deadline.' WHY???? So we can get the maximum money for DD I guess?
smudger63 Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 I wouldn`t have thought Silva would have flew over here if he was told that he would only be signed if Drinkwater left!
Babylon Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 1 minute ago, AKCJ said: It's pretty ****ing obvious why you idiots We've currently got 4 midfielders that would want first team football. I would say that we've negotiated this deal with the idea that Drinkwater will go in mind though. No reasoning with them mate.
Vacamion Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Wow. I've been offline for a few hours. I wasn't expecting that.
DatfoxesKid23 Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Just now, lanefox said: Is this down to ffp? no we probably got 200 million from this year due to champions league
Jimbo Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Someone book Drinkwater an Uber. Get him down to Stamford bridge quick
FoxinNotts Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Just now, lanefox said: Is this down to ffp? Yes. We can't keep spending as we are at our threshold. We need to sell before we buy. That's also the reason why Dragovic is only a loan
Kp1984 Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 15m reporter at raining ground just said deal is close for silva but only will go through depending on drink water leaving
Fox 4 Life Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Just now, Kitchandro said: Either we want him or we don't. Signing him only if Drinky goes just highlights our crap approach to this market. Ridiculous. What if Drinkwater stays - do we not want to improve our midfield then? Exactly and drinky will prob go in January if he doesn't now so we will be stuck again then
surrifox Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 This is a bit weird - hands the advantage to chelski in the negotiations . They now know we have to sell .
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.