Gerard Posted 30 August 2017 Posted 30 August 2017 7 minutes ago, polar98 said: Pretty sure chelsea have been using this as a way of forcing everton to accept a lowish bid for barkley. I don't think it's a low bid for Barkley at all. 10 months left on his contract and out injured until November, I don't see why anyone would pay £25m for him. Everton have to get a deal done today or possibly sell him in January. I would sell at almost any price if I had to as his value is plummeting. He's worth £0 in five months once the January transfer window is over.
Guest Posted 30 August 2017 Posted 30 August 2017 Why would drinky go to sit on the bench. It seems England isn't guaranteed anymore Gareth Southgate’s England regime places greater emphasis on playing time https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/aug/30/gareth-southgate-england-regime-regularity-chalobah-watford-smalling?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 30 August 2017 Posted 30 August 2017 11 minutes ago, the fox said: 100% this Drinkwater your a **** this says it all chelsea can **** themselves up the arse without lube
the fox Posted 30 August 2017 Posted 30 August 2017 And now mahrez is gonna and there is no replacement! I wanna cry!
WigstonWanderer Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 3 hours ago, toddybad said: Why would drinky go to sit on the bench. It seems England isn't guaranteed anymore Gareth Southgate’s England regime places greater emphasis on playing time https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/aug/30/gareth-southgate-england-regime-regularity-chalobah-watford-smalling?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Copy_to_clipboard This is great news if true and if adhered to. It's good for England and good for smaller clubs like Leicester as it will help to prevent the bigger clubs hoarding players and give us a recruitment advantage.
st albans fox Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 5 hours ago, the fox said: And now mahrez is gonna and there is no replacement! I wanna cry! There isn't? actually, there might not be player for player, position for position but we would certainly look to replace the wages and use the fee
esoog Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 4 minutes ago, LCFCABC said: This isn't going to happen I have been naive to think it won't. But after his transfer request I hope he does go. No statement to the club supporters.
StanSP Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Chelsea's bid for him, I'm told, includes a £7.5m add on if they win the Champions League and half that if they reach the semi finals. Their preference is Drinkwater over Barkley. Will definitely be awkward if no move goes through and we have a very unhappy player at the squad!
Countryfox Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Just now, StanSP said: Chelsea's bid for him, I'm told, includes a £7.5m add on if they win the Champions League and half that if they reach the semi finals. Their preference is Drinkwater over Barkley. Will definitely be awkward if no move goes through and we have a very unhappy player at the squad! He'll get over it ... said he loved it here .. then he wants to go ... then he'll love it here again ... then ... you get the picture.
STUHILL Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 1 minute ago, StanSP said: Chelsea's bid for him, I'm told, includes a £7.5m add on if they win the Champions League and half that if they reach the semi finals. Their preference is Drinkwater over Barkley. Will definitely be awkward if no move goes through and we have a very unhappy player at the squad! What's the bid? I really hope we have a replacement lined up. Great opportunity for us to add some much needed creativity at CM.
somebum Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Think he had something in his new contract that stated if a big club comes in for him he should be allowed to go at a minimum price
ronnup Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Riyad might have scuppered his bid. My worry is Shakes, would the owners care that much about pissing him off that much by selling them both? I say no.
Gerard Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 2 minutes ago, StanSP said: Chelsea's bid for him, I'm told, includes a £7.5m add on if they win the Champions League and half that if they reach the semi finals. Their preference is Drinkwater over Barkley. Will definitely be awkward if no move goes through and we have a very unhappy player at the squad! Is that just for this season or over the length of the contract? The two clubs seems a million miles apart on valuation but maybe they could both save face if the deal ended up being £30m + £10m add ons. Chelsea need a English CDM to fill the void in their squad and quota so perhaps they become increasingly desperate to find a solution and maybe we want rid of Drinkwater now after his transfer request antics.
Out Foxed Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 i've met the lad and he comes across as an arse.
Countryfox Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Just now, Out Foxed said: i've met the lad and he comes across as an arse. He came over your arse !! ... moderatorrrrrs !!!!!
ClaphamFox Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 5 minutes ago, somebum said: Think he had something in his new contract that stated if a big club comes in for him he should be allowed to go at a minimum price If that were the case he'd already have gone.
somebum Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 Just now, ClaphamFox said: If that were the case he'd already have gone. maybe the minimum price has not been met
STUHILL Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 2 minutes ago, Out Foxed said: i've met the lad and he comes across as an arse. I think he is a bit of a miserable git to be fair. Not sure how well he would respond to being denied this move but he is on the fringes of England so would need to buckle down and get on with it which I think he would.
StanSP Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 8 minutes ago, STUHILL said: What's the bid? I really hope we have a replacement lined up. Great opportunity for us to add some much needed creativity at CM. No word on any replacements. Concerning with Mendy going as well which leaves us with only 4 CMs. It was the bid for £23m. Presumably only for this upcoming season. I believe we're not that bothered about the CL clause and would rather just have a outright transfer fee for upwards of £30m.
Out Foxed Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 4 minutes ago, Countryfox said: He came over your arse !! ... moderatorrrrrs !!!!! i hope the rest of your thousands of posts aren't as terrible as this. if so, take a break from the internet.
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 2 minutes ago, Out Foxed said: i hope the rest of your thousands of posts aren't as terrible as this. if so, take a break from the internet. I quite enjoyed it
Countryfox Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 1 minute ago, Out Foxed said: i hope the rest of your thousands of posts aren't as terrible as this. if so, take a break from the internet. We all try and cope with the prospect of losing half our team and players wanting to go in different ways ..
Grebfromgrebland Posted 31 August 2017 Posted 31 August 2017 It's weird we bid for gylfi which meant we know we needed a creative midfielder and when that was knocked back we didn't go for an alternative even though we know we have a gap in the squad. We've done this before where we miss out on a target but then don't go for an alternative and then just muddle on.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.