mozartfox Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 3 minutes ago, MattP said: How the hell we have ended up with King in our midfield is baffling. Result of having Rudkin as DoF.
Bryn Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 1 minute ago, EnglishOxide said: 1. He's been injured 2. We don't need a 3 man midfield against Huddersfield. 1) He's not now. 2) This is a very tough game, they're flying. 3) Shakey has shown absolutely no indication to play the kind of shape and style Iborra fits.
manders86 Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 Fingers crossed it's Adrien Silva in a Andy King mask! Think this could also be a good chance for Chilwell to claim the left back spot as his own.
Sharpe's Fox Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 Kingy will play well and prove you ****ers wrong
Guest seanfox778 Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 Come on Leicester!! A win would be lovely today.
kingfox Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 King vs Mooy Andy will probably now put in a defensive blinder and score the winner.
tsintskaro Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 my god again this leicester legend in midfield
Old Fox Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 2 minutes ago, Bryn said: I can't work out why we signed Iborra if we're never going to play a three man midfield. Shakey clearly easing him in after injury......it's frustrating but hopefully the loyalty he is showing to established players will be repaid in effort by the likes of king and albrighton
Merging Cultures Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 I've got no problem with Shakey's selection there. Got my gun loaded in prep for the substitutionsWhere we bring on a defender, concede, bring on an attacker, look positive but they have shut up shop... Those sort of subs?!
Jimothy Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 5 minutes ago, MattP said: How the hell we have ended up with King in our midfield is baffling. We've sold Drinkwater, ****ed up the Silva signing. James has a knock, Iborra is just coming back from injury. Not really that baffling.
Nugent Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 Seriously what was the point in spending £2.5m and whatever wages on Jakupovic for him to be third choice? I know that's peanuts these days but it's still baffling. If Shakey wanted Hamer as second choice we should have just used an academy lad for third choice. I would not be happy if I was Jakupovic.
StriderHiryu Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 King knows the English pace and has played Huddersfield plenty of times before. Given their pressing game I understand the reluctance to give Iborra his debut. But nervous like everyone else. Hope it's not justified!!!
Larry_LCFC Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 You have to ask serious questions about the ambition of our club when Andy King is starting in midfield. Jesus.
Kitchandro Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 5 minutes ago, EnglishOxide said: 1. He's been injured 2. We don't need a 3 man midfield against Huddersfield. But we've gone with 1 man which is a bit extreme
Babylon Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 Just now, Facecloth said: We've sold Drinkwater, ****ed up the Silva signing. James has a knock, Iborra is just coming back from injury. Not really that baffling. Not sure what people were expecting really, Iborra has only had one reserve game and is well behind the rest in terms of fitness. We shouldn't be in this situation, but it's not the managers fault.
the fox Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 I will give kingy 10 free backward passes, anymore than that and he will get slated
ARTY_FOX Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 I don't mind king starting. Would have preferred to see what iborra has got but oh well. Glad iheanacho is in. Should be strong in attack.
Babylon Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 1 minute ago, Larry_LCFC said: You have to ask serious questions about the ambition of our club when Andy King is starting in midfield. Jesus. What's ambition got to do with having people out injured, still coming back from injury, selling a players and buggering up the replacement. Bad luck, incompetent. but nothing to do with ambition.
Kitchandro Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 4 minutes ago, Bryn said: 1) He's not now. 2) This is a very tough game, they're flying. 3) Shakey has shown absolutely no indication to play the kind of shape and style Iborra fits. If Iborra can't play in a 2 then for me he's a bad signing. We should have been signing players who fit a 2 man midfield because that's our preferred formation. We're unlikely to go with 3 at the back and I refuse to watch us if we're going with 1 up top.
CupidStunt Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 8 minutes ago, Bryn said: I can't work out why we signed Iborra if we're never going to play a three man midfield. We needed someone to take the place of Gokun Inler, Iborra is going/will be go exactly the same way
the fox Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 Looking forward to the kelechi-vardy-mahrez partnership.
Suzie the Fox Posted 16 September 2017 Posted 16 September 2017 Might see Iborra being subbed on later for king though. Fingers being crossed as I type.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.