Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Beechey

Huddersfield away match thread

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, MattP said:

How the hell we have ended up with King in our midfield is baffling. 

Result of having Rudkin as DoF.

Posted
1 minute ago, EnglishOxide said:

 

1. He's been injured

2. We don't need a 3 man midfield against Huddersfield.

 

1) He's not now.

2) This is a very tough game, they're flying.

3) Shakey has shown absolutely no indication to play the kind of shape and style Iborra fits.

Guest seanfox778
Posted

Come on Leicester!! A win would be lovely today.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bryn said:

I can't work out why we signed Iborra if we're never going to play a three man midfield.

Shakey clearly easing him in after injury......it's frustrating but hopefully the loyalty he is showing to established players will be repaid in effort by the likes of king and albrighton

Posted
I've got no problem with Shakey's selection there. Got my gun loaded in prep for the substitutions
Where we bring on a defender, concede, bring on an attacker, look positive but they have shut up shop... Those sort of subs?!
Posted
5 minutes ago, MattP said:

How the hell we have ended up with King in our midfield is baffling. 

We've sold Drinkwater, ****ed up the Silva signing. James has a knock, Iborra is just coming back from injury. Not really that baffling.

Posted

Seriously what was the point in spending £2.5m and whatever wages on Jakupovic for him to be third choice? I know that's peanuts these days but it's still baffling. If Shakey wanted Hamer as second choice we should have just used an academy lad for third choice. I would not be happy if I was Jakupovic.

Posted

King knows the English pace and has played Huddersfield plenty of times before. Given their pressing game I understand the reluctance to give Iborra his debut. 

 

But nervous like everyone else. Hope it's not justified!!!

Posted
5 minutes ago, EnglishOxide said:

 

1. He's been injured

2. We don't need a 3 man midfield against Huddersfield.

But we've gone with 1 man which is a bit extreme :whistle:

Posted
Just now, Facecloth said:

We've sold Drinkwater, ****ed up the Silva signing. James has a knock, Iborra is just coming back from injury. Not really that baffling.

Not sure what people were expecting really, Iborra has only had one reserve game and is well behind the rest in terms of fitness. We shouldn't be in this situation, but it's not the managers fault.

Posted
1 minute ago, Larry_LCFC said:

You have to ask serious questions about the ambition of our club when Andy King is starting in midfield. Jesus.

What's ambition got to do with having people out injured, still coming back from injury, selling a players and buggering up the replacement. Bad luck, incompetent. but nothing to do with ambition.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bryn said:

 

1) He's not now.

2) This is a very tough game, they're flying.

3) Shakey has shown absolutely no indication to play the kind of shape and style Iborra fits.

If Iborra can't play in a 2 then for me he's a bad signing.

 

We should have been signing players who fit a 2 man midfield because that's our preferred formation.

 

We're unlikely to go with 3 at the back and I refuse to watch us if we're going with 1 up top.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Bryn said:

I can't work out why we signed Iborra if we're never going to play a three man midfield.

We needed someone to take the place of Gokun Inler, Iborra is going/will be go exactly the same way

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...