Father Ted Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 9 hours ago, ScouseFox said: that west brom game was mad, was probably one of our best games of the second half of the season in terms of football and chances created etc, just couldn’t win. they got back in the good books when they won us the league though. fu ck “chelsea winning leicester the league”, it was tony pulis and his absolute mob that did it the week before. That was when it was done for me too. Popped out for a couple of drinks expecting a convincing Spurs victory, low and behold big Craig Dawson popped up and I didn't get home until 4am. That's when I knew it was happening
UniFox21 Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 26 minutes ago, Father Ted said: That was when it was done for me too. Popped out for a couple of drinks expecting a convincing Spurs victory, low and behold big Craig Dawson popped up and I didn't get home until 4am. That's when I knew it was happening I was stood in McDonalds when my dad text me saying WBA had equalised, was a bloody brilliant moment
UniFox21 Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 This is really misleading for me. Puts it as Utd giving games to their kids frequently, when it's basically just Rashford Edit: Forgot Lingard and Pogba
AKCJ Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 2 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: This is really misleading for me. Puts it as Utd giving games to their kids frequently, when it's basically just Rashford Pretty sure that counts Lingard and Pogba too. Lingard spent about 10 years on loan and Pogba was a world record signing.
sylofox Posted 30 January 2019 Author Posted 30 January 2019 7 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: This is really misleading for me. Puts it as Utd giving games to their kids frequently, when it's basically just Rashford So Rashford has played 54 premier league games so far this season.
Guest ttfn Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 26 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: This is really misleading for me. Puts it as Utd giving games to their kids frequently, when it's basically just Rashford And of course there are only six sides in the Premier League.
UniFox21 Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 26 minutes ago, AKCJ said: Pretty sure that counts Lingard and Pogba too. Lingard spent about 10 years on loan and Pogba was a world record signing. Completely forgot about them. Pogba left the academy but developed really at Juventus, so should he be counted?
AKCJ Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 Just now, UniFox21 said: Completely forgot about them. Pogba left the academy but developed really at Juventus, so should he be counted? Plus Pogba didn't join Man United until he was about 16.
UniFox21 Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 Just now, AKCJ said: Plus Pogba didn't join Man United until he was about 16. Just "bodging" the numbers to make it seem better.
Nalis Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 32 minutes ago, ttfn said: And of course there are only six sides in the Premier League. So true, basically the researcher couldnt be arsed checking the figures for the likes of Watford and Huddersfield, probably because they take more effort to research.
sylofox Posted 30 January 2019 Author Posted 30 January 2019 1 hour ago, UniFox21 said: This is really misleading for me. Puts it as Utd giving games to their kids frequently, when it's basically just Rashford Edit: Forgot Lingard and Pogba Look at that list against the list for players 22 and under. Chelsea 151 Man c 1107 And our total is still streets ahead of these bent stats. This has probably been done by a man u fan wanting an excuse for winning nothing. I bet a spud could alter the perameters so they finish top and have another excuse.
MC Prussian Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 Maxi Gomez to West Ham for "only" £40m. These (January transfer) prices... Ridiculous.
UniFox21 Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 29 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: Maxi Gomez to West Ham for "only" £40m. These (January transfer) prices... Ridiculous. "only" £40m, they're spending big money lately. Pellegrini will be expected to pull out a decent european challenge with money like that being chucked around.
Babylon Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 12 minutes ago, Corky said: Are Chelsea much better than last season? Manager is a bit out of his depth IMO, some strange decisions with some very good players.
420Hashish Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 Chelsea lost 4-0 to Bournemouth. Let's hope we can grab a win too.
Corky Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 Zaha sent off for Palace. Misses a huge game with Fulham.
Crispin LA Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 5 minutes ago, The Doctor said: Chelsea 4 down What do expect when Chelsea have over 20 players on loan to other teams
Ted Maul Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 On 29/01/2019 at 21:49, Ted Maul said: Nah. It's going to be one of those ****ing mental midweek set of fixtures where everyone drops points like the one where we drew to West Brom in the title season. Yup.
Tuna Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 12 minutes ago, Crispin LA said: What do expect when Chelsea have over 20 players on loan to other teams Yeah, they are really missing Matt Miazga
Jimothy Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 14 minutes ago, Crispin LA said: What do expect when Chelsea have over 20 players on loan to other teams Don't think that's making much difference. Those players wouldn't make the squad, and it wouldn't stop Sarri playing Kante out of position, or dropping an inform Willian.
StriderHiryu Posted 30 January 2019 Posted 30 January 2019 Sarri has managed to lose the Chelsea dressing room in world record time. Quite unbelievable! Well played Bournemouth mind you!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.