Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

£50m plus Roberts for me should be our floor. No lower should be considered and we should squeeze for more. Not fair to deny Riyad again, if that deal has been offered and Man City clearly won't move, then we should accept it. £50m will allow us to get 1 amazing player, or 2/3 good starters in. Will probably need to really spend big to fill the hole Mahrez will leave though.

Edited by Beechey
Posted
1 minute ago, Costock_Fox said:

What if Roberts is a replacement for Gray and we are still after a replacement for Riyad?

What's the latest rumours on Ben Arfa anyway? Having someone of his experience in the short term whilst we nurture younger players to eventually fill that role seems a good option to me.

Posted
1 minute ago, rachhere said:

What's the latest rumours on Ben Arfa anyway? Having someone of his experience in the short term whilst we nurture younger players to eventually fill that role seems a good option to me.

Still a massive gamble, got a feeling he'd be heinous with us like he was at Newcastle and Hull.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Ted Maul said:

Unless we're planning on moving Gray on. 

Considered that was as well when thinking about it. Wouldn't be shocked.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Still a massive gamble, got a feeling he'd be heinous with us like he was at Newcastle and Hull.

given the way hes reported to have been at PSG,the club shouldnt go anywhere near him tbh

Posted
24 minutes ago, Fox 4 Life said:

But Hazard is a better player than Mahrez and also plays for Chelsea, whilst this isn't fair, it does increase the price.

Check the figures for the last three seasons.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said:

In a transfer window where its crucial that we get in the right players of the right quality that's exactly the sort of attitude that would see the kind of up and coming talent turn us down.

So up and coming talent will only sign for us if we agree to let them go on the cheap? That's the sort of attitude that would see us regularly getting ripped off by the big boys.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Fox 4 Life said:

But Hazard is a better player than Mahrez and also plays for Chelsea, whilst this isn't fair, it does increase the price.

The stats of the last three seasons say otherwise.

Posted

Nobody is a "replacement" for anyone. It's about options, balance and developing players.

 

In developing players, we can experiment a little and mix things up a bit where more established/experienced players might starting packing a sad, saying they know better and becoming all half-arsed. You need to shake sh*t up sometimes.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, hackneyfox said:

Check the figures for the last three seasons.

 

I wonder if Hazard had played for Leicester and Mahrez had played for Chelsea these last three seasons if people would lazily and automatically assume that Mahrez is the superior player?

 

There seems plenty of bias and snobbery when comparing the two even from our own fans.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

I think if Roberts comes in then we'll look to bring in a much more gifted right footed winger to play on the opposite side and you might be right in Gray being moved on. I don't see us having Diabate, Roberts and then another Mahrez replacement all vying for that right sided role. That's why if we get Roberts I think we'll go big guns for Elyounoussi who is a very strong attacker that plays left or right but would work best as an inverted winger on the left.

You would hope so wouldn't you because if either Gray or Diabate start week in week out we really are going to struggle.

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said:

What if Roberts is a replacement for Gray and we are still after a replacement for Riyad?

That's how I read it:

 

N5QyX4H.jpg

 

 

 

Guest ttfn
Posted
17 minutes ago, CarbonVirtine said:

Nobody is a "replacement" for anyone. It's about options, balance and developing players.

 

Exactly. Wouldn’t surprise me at all if we played without wingers next season.

Posted

Like some have mentioned, I'd be looking to shift Gray out and bring in a marquee wide man as a guaranteed starter as the Mahrez replacement.

 

Some club will fork out at least £20m for Gray, so having that combined £70m + Patrick Roberts gives a very decent wedge.

Posted
1 minute ago, ttfn said:

Exactly. Wouldn’t surprise me at all if we played without wingers next season.

So we can sing the song by Westlife, 'flying without wing[er]sssss!'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I need to do some work lol 

Guest Markyblue
Posted

Some people on here think mahrez is better than hazard.really .take those blue tinted glasses off boys.

Posted
1 minute ago, Markyblue said:

Some people on here think mahrez is better than hazard.really .take those blue tinted glasses off boys.

Mahrez certainly offers more in terms of goals and assists.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, hackneyfox said:

So up and coming talent will only sign for us if we agree to let them go on the cheap? That's the sort of attitude that would see us regularly getting ripped off by the big boys.

Is £50m plus a player really getting ripped off though? He was promised the move for this amount, we backed out and if we back out again can you really see a promising player joining knowing they will be lied to if they ever want to leave.

Posted
36 minutes ago, rachhere said:

What's the latest rumours on Ben Arfa anyway? Having someone of his experience in the short term whilst we nurture younger players to eventually fill that role seems a good option to me.

I have no idea but I really don't see HBA as a replacement for Riyad, the guy flopped in the premier league.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said:

Is £50m plus a player really getting ripped off though? He was promised the move for this amount, we backed out and if we back out again can you really see a promising player joining knowing they will be lied to if they ever want to leave.

He was promised the move for that amount and then prices went crazy.

We're back with the selling your house analogy again.

Posted

I think we can get another 15m out of them. 

 

Absolutely no reason to sell right now. He's not going to the World Cup so there's no risk of long term injuries or the added rush to get deals concluded.

 

I think if we can get 65m plus Roberts then thats a good deal all round. Man City get a world class winger, we get good money and a good English prospect that will get PL game time.

 

Then use to money to get someone good plus a central defender and I think we can look forward to another good season.

Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, ZeGuy said:

The stats of the last three seasons say otherwise.

This season Mahrez has the same goals and more assists. Every other aspect of the game such as successful take on's, key passes, pass completion, ground covered, defensive stats etc etc Hazard is better than him. He is way more of a threat than Mahrez. Not having a go at Riyad as Hazard is class but he is not better than him because he has a few more assists.

Edited by Fox 4 Life
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...