Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Snik-Snok

Stadium Expansion Plan Meeting

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 hours ago, Ashley said:

So are you guessing or have you been told?

Yeah kind of but bigger. 

Had it described by someone working alongside a partner of the club on the stadium. The term 'Suprastadio' was used to describe it, and a google image search brings this type of thing up. Some more pronounced than others, but generally this style with a smaller footprint, which would make sense so as not to encroach onto the existing land behind the east stand, to allow further development there.

Of course, it might all be *******, just thought sharing is caring. :thumbup:

The plans will be released soon enough!

Posted
23 hours ago, LCFC FOX said:

Will the club think about safe standing with the new stands?

As knowing our luck the stadium will be completed and then parliament will allow safe standing again

 

23 hours ago, Babylon said:

No

lol I really don't get some people. What's so hard to understand. Safe standing is not legal so why would the club look into it. That would be a total waste of time and money until the law changes. 

Posted
1 hour ago, sylofox said:

 

lol I really don't get some people. What's so hard to understand. Safe standing is not legal so why would the club look into it. That would be a total waste of time and money until the law changes. 

You'd best report Shrewsbury to the police then. :rolleyes:

https://www.shropshirestar.com/sport/football/shrewsbury-town-fc/2018/05/23/safe-standing-launched-at-shrewsbury-town-ground---with-video-and-pictures/

Posted
1 hour ago, thesilverfox said:

Had it described by someone working alongside a partner of the club on the stadium. The term 'Suprastadio' was used to describe it, and a google image search brings this type of thing up. Some more pronounced than others, but generally this style with a smaller footprint, which would make sense so as not to encroach onto the existing land behind the east stand, to allow further development there.

Of course, it might all be *******, just thought sharing is caring. :thumbup:

The plans will be released soon enough!

You do realise we own the land behind the east stand so that isn't a problem? 

Guest Papasmurf
Posted
5 minutes ago, Ashley said:

You do realise we own the land behind the east stand so that isn't a problem? 

Wasn't there a problem trying to acquire some of the land or national grid building?

Posted
13 minutes ago, Papasmurf said:

Wasn't there a problem trying to acquire some of the land or national grid building?

That's further down, no?

Guest Papasmurf
Posted
1 hour ago, Ashley said:

That's further down, no?

Not sure. Maybe. Walk past it every game and can't actually remember what's past the walkway??

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, red5 said:

Standing is not illegal, safe or otherwise. 

It is within the stadium. And to prove it you stand and watch then throw you out.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bunyip said:

It is within the stadium. And to prove it you stand and watch then throw you out.

It's against the ground regulations but not illegal

Posted
1 minute ago, Stadt said:

It's against the ground regulations but not illegal

Well, next time you stand up and refuse to sit down try telling that to the stewards as they throw you out and get you banned. You can then feel all warm and justified that it wasn't illegal.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

But do you get arrested if you stand up? No you don't, because it isn't illegal :)

It is within the stadium that is why they have the legal right to eject you.:thumbup:

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bunyip said:

It is within the stadium that is why they have the legal right to eject you.:thumbup:

Please give up.

Posted

Can you take this debate to this thread please - 

 

Posted
22 hours ago, Beechey said:

This is seanfromenderby's second account. Load of crap.

Second??? He has many more. Sits there tweeting from account to account sado

Posted
5 hours ago, Voll Blau said:

I legal or not name a club in the top two divisions that has standing other than a newly promoted side that have two years to conform. So if it's not illegal why don't clubs just put rail seating in. 

Posted
On ‎21‎/‎08‎/‎2018 at 22:13, ian_marshall said:

Sorry couldn't resist, but you've not enhanced your credibility with that one! 

That's ok, didn't have any anyway!

Guest Kopfkino
Posted
On 29/08/2018 at 17:45, sylofox said:

I legal or not name a club in the top two divisions that has standing other than a newly promoted side that have two years to conform. So if it's not illegal why don't clubs just put rail seating in. 

 

Brentford are allowed to keep using their terrace - fifth season since they got promoted now. Also are pushing to get it in their new ground - no idea why it would be futile for us to look into it but not Brentford.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...