Harry Maguire signs new contract until 2023!

[Guest Markyblue]

1 hour ago, Bob Weasel Fox said:

I don’t normally comment on this sort of stuff but blimey gorgeous, great hair, beautiful face, great body

 

****ing fantastic clothes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and a decent bird on his arm aswell . . . . 

What does she see in the multi millionaire England international. 

[Ric Flair]

1 hour ago, Babylon said:

The key thing being supposedly.

That's what I was insinuating, always thought it seemed a load of toss.

[foxes_rule1978]

13 minutes ago, Markyblue said:

What does she see in the multi millionaire England international. 

No idea, he doesn’t have anything on me at tic tac toe... 

[DANGEROUS TIGER]

Quote

Good on you Harry. A five year deal.

As above.

[grumpy old git]

Great new news to have these players on long contracts now, others will now have to pay through the nose for them if we sell.

Hopefully none of these new contracts have those stupid release clauses in them like Kante’s did if they have let’s hope it’s a bit above the market value.

 

[Izzy]

So apparently Puel says in today’s presser that he doesn’t know if Maguires new contract has a release clause in it if not.

 

Really?

[STUHILL]

1 hour ago, Izzy Muzzett said:

So apparently Puel says in today’s presser that he doesn’t know if Maguires new contract has a release clause in it if not.

 

Really?

He probably does know and playing dumb, so he doesn't get asked the details of every new contract or player signed.  I doubt there is, but I imagine it would be £100m + if so and definitely not a low number, otherwise it would have not been in our interest to give him a new contract.

Edited 13 September 2018 by STUHILL

[Nickfosse]

1 hour ago, Izzy Muzzett said:

So apparently Puel says in today’s presser that he doesn’t know if Maguires new contract has a release clause in it if not.

 

Really?

I know his mumbling broken English can be a bit hard on the ear sometimes, but he’s actually very skilled at avoiding giving answers to questions he’s not keen on. 

[The Doctor]

1 hour ago, Izzy Muzzett said:

So apparently Puel says in today’s presser that he doesn’t know if Maguires new contract has a release clause in it if not.

 

Really?

Quite possible he doesn't know the terms of the contract if that's negotiated by Rudkin and Puel just says a player is important to the squad or not in first team plans etc.

[Gerard]

On 10/09/2018 at 14:08, Bob Weasel Fox said:

I don’t normally comment on this sort of stuff but blimey gorgeous, great hair, beautiful face, great body

  

****ing fantastic clothes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and a decent bird on his arm aswell . . . . 

 

i knew that punchline was coming.

 

Still laughed though. 

[st albans fox]

3 hours ago, STUHILL said:

He probably does know and playing dumb, so he doesn't get asked the details of every new contract or player signed.  I doubt there is, but I imagine it would be £100m + if so and definitely not a low number, otherwise it would have not been in our interest to give him a new contract.

We don’t do release clauses and we wouldn’t have bothered adding a year to his current deal if it meant inserting one. 

 

And in the event that we did, a player on 80k/week wouldn’t warrant a RC of 100 m

[ARM1968]

Scenes when he goes in the summer for £29 million and Smalling. 

[Bazly]

Seems to be the last piece in the backbone jigsaw. At least Puel has his rocks that he can build around with some semblance of stability, until of course the press think the player is too good to be stuck at Leicester City.

[Hanan96]

Anybody can tell me the release clause is not 5 mill? 

[Suzie the Fox]

2 minutes ago, Hanan96 said:

Anybody can tell me the release clause is not 5 mill? 

The release cause is not £5mill  

[STUHILL]

18 hours ago, st albans fox said:

We don’t do release clauses and we wouldn’t have bothered adding a year to his current deal if it meant inserting one. 

 

And in the event that we did, a player on 80k/week wouldn’t warrant a RC of 100 m

Since when?

 

I did say I doubt that there is one though, but if there is, it would no doubt be a very high one, as otherwise not in our interest at all to give him a new contract with one inserted.

[Corky]

23 hours ago, Izzy Muzzett said:

So apparently Puel says in today’s presser that he doesn’t know if Maguires new contract has a release clause in it if not.

 

Really?

He probably does but doesn't want to shout about it to the press who are desperate for Maguire to leave.

[st albans fox]

1 hour ago, STUHILL said:

Since when?

 

I did say I doubt that there is one though, but if there is, it would no doubt be a very high one, as otherwise not in our interest at all to give him a new contract with one inserted.

Since ngolo

[Izzy]

No buy-out clause in his new contract according to SSN

[RutlanderFox]

55 minutes ago, Izzy Muzzett said:

No buy-out clause in his new contract according to SSN

They’ve also said that it was one of the “key sticking points” in the new contract so does that mean Maguire and his representatives were after one to make it easier for him to leave?

[Izzy]

5 minutes ago, RutlanderFox said:

They’ve also said that it was one of the “key sticking points” in the new contract so does that mean Maguire and his representatives were after one to make it easier for him to leave?

Must admit that was the first thing that crossed my mind...

[HankMarvin]

More displays like Saturday and I don’t think we need to worry about release clauses

[Poznan34]

Harry Maguire nominated for FSF POTY