Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, MattP said:

She should have stuck to being on-message with what can be verified about what she does, in this day and age such things tend to get found out pretty quickly with public figures.

 

That being said, a Tweet with a lack of clarity that was then clarified and explained is hardly the worst thing to happen. Better an explanation than doubling down when caught in a prevarication or an outright lie - perhaps those people with much more influence than her who rail against her should try that some time.

 

 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Tommo220 said:

Quite funny that we hold a 15(?) year old girl more accountable for the content of her tweets than we do politicians and world leaders! lol

The point I was trying to make in much less words.  Thank you.

 

Edit: with the additional caveat that we don't often see those politicians actually explaining their comments other than with dismissal when attempts are made to hold them accountable.

Edited by leicsmac
Posted
10 minutes ago, Tommo220 said:

Quite funny that we hold a 15(?) year old girl more accountable for the content of her tweets than we do politicians and world leaders! lol

I‘m pretty sure Miss T doesn‘t tweet in person. She has her own entourage to take care of Social Media.

 

Latest coup is showing her sitting on the train floor in Germany.

See past the propaganda.

Posted
2 minutes ago, MC Prussian said:

I‘m pretty sure Miss T doesn‘t tweet in person. She has her own entourage to take care of Social Media.

 

Latest coup is showing her sitting on the train floor in Germany.

See past the propaganda.

Yes, exactly.

 

When do we start holding those world leaders and politicians that Tommo mentions accountable in the same way?

  • Thanks 1
Posted

A driver caused an explosion in his car when he lit a cigarette after spraying air freshener.

He used "excessive" amounts of the aerosol scent before sparking up, according to firefighters.

Gas from the spray ignited, blew out the windscreen and windows and buckled the doors but the man escaped with only minor injuries.

Police said the incident in Halifax on Saturday "could've been worse" and warned people to follow safety advice.

The motorist was in stationary traffic in Fountain Street in the town at about 15:00 GMT on Saturday when the explosion happened.

It was so powerful it caused damage to windows at nearby businesses.

 

The damaged car

Posted
28 minutes ago, davieG said:

A driver caused an explosion in his car when he lit a cigarette after spraying air freshener.

He used "excessive" amounts of the aerosol scent before sparking up, according to firefighters.

Gas from the spray ignited, blew out the windscreen and windows and buckled the doors but the man escaped with only minor injuries.

Police said the incident in Halifax on Saturday "could've been worse" and warned people to follow safety advice.

The motorist was in stationary traffic in Fountain Street in the town at about 15:00 GMT on Saturday when the explosion happened.

It was so powerful it caused damage to windows at nearby businesses.

 

The damaged car

I think the car might need a bit more air freshener in it now!

Posted
2 hours ago, leicsmac said:

Yes, exactly.

 

When do we start holding those world leaders and politicians that Tommo mentions accountable in the same way?

When they're left wing politicians of course.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 16/12/2019 at 13:46, davieG said:

A driver caused an explosion in his car when he lit a cigarette after spraying air freshener.

He used "excessive" amounts of the aerosol scent before sparking up, according to firefighters.

Gas from the spray ignited, blew out the windscreen and windows and buckled the doors but the man escaped with only minor injuries.

Police said the incident in Halifax on Saturday "could've been worse" and warned people to follow safety advice.

The motorist was in stationary traffic in Fountain Street in the town at about 15:00 GMT on Saturday when the explosion happened.

It was so powerful it caused damage to windows at nearby businesses.

 

The damaged car

TBF the freshness of the air would have been improved somewhat by blowing all the windows out 

Posted
On 16/12/2019 at 13:46, davieG said:

A driver caused an explosion in his car when he lit a cigarette after spraying air freshener.

He used "excessive" amounts of the aerosol scent before sparking up, according to firefighters.

Gas from the spray ignited, blew out the windscreen and windows and buckled the doors but the man escaped with only minor injuries.

Police said the incident in Halifax on Saturday "could've been worse" and warned people to follow safety advice.

The motorist was in stationary traffic in Fountain Street in the town at about 15:00 GMT on Saturday when the explosion happened.

It was so powerful it caused damage to windows at nearby businesses.

 

The damaged car

I reckon he’d consumed some early seasonal sprouts 

Posted
13 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50834324

 

This is the day it's confirmed then. Can't see anything other than an acquittal in the Senate, but it will be interesting to see what dirty laundry might get aired during the process.

I do wonder what the fallout will be from this, even more divisive politics I would say given that a proportion of his support take anything anti-Trump as the "fake news media" out to get him.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, ajthefox said:

I do wonder what the fallout will be from this, even more divisive politics I would say given that a proportion of his support take anything anti-Trump as the "fake news media" out to get him.

I can't see anything other than the dividing lines becoming more stark too, but then unless the Dems are utterly bereft of sense then they'd know that going in.

 

Which means they either feel totally beholden to do the "right" thing (and in that case why now?) or they believe during the trial something will come up that will seriously damage Trumps prospects next year. I guess we'll find out.

Edited by leicsmac
Posted
17 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50834324

 

This is the day it's confirmed then. Can't see anything other than an acquittal in the Senate, but it will be interesting to see what dirty laundry might get aired during the process.

I think this is one of them things that, it's important to do, even if failure is likely. If we believe in our constitution, our democracy, etc. then our legislature cannot let any President do what Trump is accused of without repercussion. 

 

The fact that 1/3 +1 Senator is only needed to acquit the President, is no reason not to impeach him. 

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, ajthefox said:

What actually happens afterwards? Assuming he is impeached, that is?


Does Pence take over?

Well, he's going to be impeached - the question is if the Senate will vote to convict him on the impeachment charges (in all likelihood, no).

 

In the unlikely event he is convicted, Pence assumes power for the remainder of the term, yes.

  • Thanks 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...