Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 25/10/2020 at 05:19, Fox in the North said:

 

Sweet.

Posted
1 hour ago, Mehrez said:

Looks like a Poundland Seagrave. 3 full sized pitches pffft

It is remarkable that (if figures in the press are to be believed) we're spending twice the amount on our new training facility than Liverpool.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mehrez said:

Looks like a Poundland Seagrave. 3 full sized pitches pffft

Yeah but don't forget that it means more

 

Fenway Red Sox, rah rah rah. 

Posted

It's bizarre at how excited i am to see this training facility considering i'm never (unlikely) going to be able to visit it. We'er going to be the envy of every club in Europe with these facilities!

Posted

Why do LCFC need a Sports Turf Academy? Is it to provide Turf expertise to others as a saleable service? Sounds like a ground breaking (arf) enterprise not seen elsewhere. Others might follow :dunno:

Posted
49 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

Why do LCFC need a Sports Turf Academy? Is it to provide Turf expertise to others as a saleable service? Sounds like a ground breaking (arf) enterprise not seen elsewhere. Others might follow :dunno:

Probably started out as a community project but got enquires from clubs and businesses so decided making it a profit making business would allow them to peruse more community pro bono help.

Posted
51 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

Why do LCFC need a Sports Turf Academy? Is it to provide Turf expertise to others as a saleable service? Sounds like a ground breaking (arf) enterprise not seen elsewhere. Others might follow :dunno:

It says in one of the pictures on that tweet. Generate income from hiring office space and also facilities as well as suppling products for pitches. 

Posted
Just now, Babylon said:

So the original ideas included stables, paddock and horse racing track!! lol

Think that’s just what the Groundsman had in mind for his dream sports turf academy. I imagine all those different turfs would require different techniques etc. Given King Power’s love for polo and horse racing though, I wouldn’t be surprised if they did something about that too!

  • Like 1
Posted

Just checked the Charnwood Planning website and noticed a new document from yesterday for the discharge of condition 33.

 

Condition 33 (Travel Plan)

 

For the avoidance of doubt, Condition 33 is reproduced below:

 

'No part of the development hereby permitted shall be occupied until a Sustainable Travel Plan has been submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter the agreed Travel Plan shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details. REASON: To reduce the need to travel by single occupancy vehicle and to promote the use of sustainable modes of transport in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (2018).

 

' Highways Comments (Condition 33): The LHA's initial response with regard to the discharge of planning condition 33 was based on a review of a Travel Plan (TP) report produced by Curtins dated 24 February 2020 . The LHA made a number of comments on the February 2020 TP which it required to be included in a revised TP prior to the LHA advising no objection to discharge of the condition. The applicant has subsequently submitted a revised TP by Curtins, dated 16 October 2020.

The LHA has reviewed the revised TP and is pleased to confirm that it satisfactorily responds to all of the points raised in the LHA's observations of 08 October 2020.

 

The LHA therefore has no objection to discharge of condition 33.

 

Moving in really can't be far off now :beer:

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

Is this related to the killer junction? Or is that still an unresolved issue? 

If I remember right the travel plan was that the club would instruct everyone to turn left and go through Seagrave when leaving the complex, and that they wouldn't open the show pitch to spectators until the junction was dealt with. If that's been accepted then I see no reason why we can't move in once finished.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

How much have we bagged in late fees now then? 

The late fees is complex to say the least. 
 

LCFC would have to prove their loss - aka liquidated damages. With an existing training ground, that aren’t losing money in that sense or having to hire a facility. Possibly new staff they’ve had to hire, equipment they’ve had readied for the new place or anything else. We could only argue if we’d missed out on rent for the Belvoir Drive or similar. 
 

The further completion of the highways situation means that the contractor can argue that the site was never going to be open until then. Therefore fault is shared or even negotiated 

Posted

Wonder which player will be the first to smash one of those windows with a stray shot lol 

 

Maybe Maddison after his attempt last night...

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

Wonder which player will be the first to smash one of those windows with a stray shot lol 

 

Maybe Maddison after his attempt last night...

It'll be Schlupp. He still has some yet to come down out of orbit even though he left years ago!  

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Wonder which player will be the first to smash one of those windows with a stray shot lol 

 

Maybe Maddison after his attempt last night...

I don't expect that I was the only one thinking Huth when he did that. 

  • Like 3
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...