fuchsntf Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 5 minutes ago, baldeagle said: That bench is minging a goal keeper 4 defenders, 2 defensive mids then under and Nacho . Not many game changers if we’re chasing the game No they are playing....!! Shows where we come up short.... 2
Vazman Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 This has the makings of a good match, let's see what the Foxes can do, and Everton 1, Leicester 3 I hope 1
Vacamion Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Glad it's Pickford in goal not Olsen. Pickford always has a potential cock up or two lurking. Looks like our CBs are going to have their hands full. Win this, it would send a massive message to the rest of the league. COYB
trabuch Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 1 minute ago, Bourbon Fox said: It's bizarre. The lad looks like he's ready to rip the whole league a new one Hopefully he'll get on and be massively hungry to prove it
RowlattsFox Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Their side is a Tony Pulis/Sam Allardyce special. Centre backs everywhere and player who can take a good dead ball
NaijaFox Posted 27 January 2021 Author Posted 27 January 2021 6 minutes ago, wardyfox86 said: 5212 Holgate and Digne WBs surely. More likely the 4 CBs across the back (as with our last meeting) while pushing Digne up into midfield, where they’re missing Allan and Doucoure.
baldeagle Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 5 minutes ago, Shamomoa said: ünder has been class pretty much whenever he's played there's ur game changer... 1 player coming back form injury on a bench of 9 isn’t great though is it
Red Squirrel Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 1 minute ago, trabuch said: Hopefully he'll get on and be massively hungry to prove it Under scores underscores the more cause to avoid draws (in the pursuit of the top 4)
baldeagle Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 1 minute ago, pmcla26 said: Ricardo is defo a game changer, but like already mentioned, we need another 8/10 bad. Ricardo is class but he’s still a defender coming back form a long injury so our attacking options of the bench are very limited
lcfcsnow Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 14 minutes ago, trabuch said: I wonder what Under has to do? He really should be starting to add a different dimension to the attack with Vardy out. I foresee lots of long passes to the goalkeeper tonight.
trabuch Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Just now, Red Squirrel said: Under scores underscores the more cause to avoid draws (in the pursuit of the top 4) Applause
Clarkey123 Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Don’t get me wrong I think little Wes has been fantastic but I still think cags deserves to be back in the starting lineup for this one 1
Steve Earle Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 15 minutes ago, trabuch said: I wonder what Under has to do? Show that he offers more than Albrighton? 🤷🏽 3
Unabomber Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 I really like under but you clearly can’t drop Albrighton on current form. Are people thinking drop Barnes? 3
Sharpe's Fox Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Their midfield is so shite it hurts my eyes. Dross. We lose to that I'll be mortified.
Scotch Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 In keeping with my recent pessimism... We are going to get done here. Lucky if we scrape a draw..... 1
Simonb Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Was genuinely hoping kelechi would start this one, but hopefully with ayozes ability to link up and bring players into the game we'll have enough Their front 3 of richarlison, CL and Rodriguez is very daunting, but if we can win the midfield battle, which we should, then I think we'll reserve the 2-0 defeat down here
hejammy Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Just now, Foxy_Bear said: In keeping with my recent pessimism... We are going to get done here. Lucky if we scrape a draw..... Based on?
hejammy Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 (edited) We should win the midfield battle on this one and usually the games we win the midfield we win the game. The only caveat to this is not giving away silly free kicks in dangerous positions as they are very good at attacking set peices and we are.... Well shayte at defending them Edited 27 January 2021 by hejammy
winteriscoming Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Albrighton is always going to start ahead of Under in away league games because of the work rate he puts in. Also he is very creative with his range of passing.
trabuch Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Just now, Unabomber said: I really like under but you clearly can’t drop Albrighton on current form. Are people thinking drop Barnes? No. It's a nice problem to have. In a way I hope he doesn't get on, because that will mean we are doing well. I wonder if he might have been able to replace Perez, but I've seen no evidence that he could play centrally. But I haven't seen a great deal of evidence that Perez can (for Leicester). I trust Rodgers to know what he's doing.
Dandy king Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 Tough one to call but we've got enough to beat anyone, and we're in very good form. And we need to put right the last performance against these. 3-1 Leicester. Come on you foxes !
Lambert09 Posted 27 January 2021 Posted 27 January 2021 19 minutes ago, RowlattsFox said: We definitely need another attacking option from the bench. I know having the extra sub numbers makes it look worse but only really Under and Iheanacho we can turn to if we go behind. Well you’ve listed the 2 for the job. How many do you want exactly? Not like we have any other options. Waste a spot on grey? No thanks
Recommended Posts