fox in the sox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 5 minutes ago, Kopfkino said: The sub made **** all difference ffs. I wouldn’t have made it but it hasn’t cost us. Pure confirmation bias where no matter what happens now, there’ll be something to find to beat Brendan with no matter the merits If you bring on a defender for a midfielder the whole structure of your team changes. They didn’t look like scoring, it was stupid - and I have always supported Rodgers. 3
oadby.fox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 1 minute ago, StanSP said: Did he really bring on Vestergaard to protect a 1 goal lead How many times has that been successful? Not watched the game but were West Ham even looking like scoring before the lazy giant was brought on?! They huffed and puffed but we pretty much kept them at arms length in the second half. Vestergaard was brought on and we changed shape entirely to accommodate him and we conceded from a corner amidst the confusion and pressure. 1 1
TMELcfc Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Just now, dmayne7 said: Almost off his elbow. Half on the sleeve. Might be different if he headed it onto that part of his arm or hadn't directly led to the goal but to out it straight in with his arm is wrong and shouldn't count Rules are rules
Dames Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Just now, darko2k7 said: The sub literally made no difference to the result stop finding any excuse to hammer him every time something goes wrong . He makes a goal line clearing header you then say Rodgers is a genius Yes thats true but he didnt make a goal line clearing header, he stayed rooted to the ground whilst the attacker jumped and won the ball and scored.
Happy Fox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 We can clearly play football we are not a bad team but we just have the energy and zip taken out of the players by Rodgers tactics 1
ARTY_FOX Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 5 minutes ago, Kopfkino said: The sub made **** all difference ffs. I wouldn’t have made it but it hasn’t cost us. Pure confirmation bias where no matter what happens now, there’ll be something to find to beat Brendan with no matter the merits What cost us is having us sit off for 20 minutes and deciding to defend.our 18 yard box for the last 10. Taking off a midfield body for a cb do 'see out' the last 4 minutes against a team that play for crosses into the giant players they have. No matter what way you spin it. It was garbage management. It's pure bias to suggest he didn't get it wrong. 4
The_77 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 3 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Still Rodgers in and I’m not sorry. Anyone who’s “Rodgers in” right now won’t be happy until James Justin’s leg falls off. 1 3
Manini Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Can’t see him being sacked after a draw, unfortunately. Points might be vital come the end of the season but this bloke has got to go. Absolutely brain dead decision making again. 1
Shane Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Just now, darko2k7 said: The sub literally made no difference to the result stop finding any excuse to hammer him every time something goes wrong . He makes a goal line clearing header you then say Rodgers is a genius He shouldn't have even been on the pitch, it was the worst substitution he could have made. And yes it did cost us because Youri would have been in midfield to close them down and stop the build up leading to the corner. Youri could have also helped control the midfield for the last 7 minutes and seen the game out. Another terrible decision from Brendan which has cost us points. 2
AjcW Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Every time he gets advice from That geography teacher looking **** at the end of a game we make a shit sub and concede. If Rodgers genuinely thinks it isn’t his fault then he needs to get better people around him! 3
BigGibbo Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 1 minute ago, darko2k7 said: The sub literally made no difference to the result stop finding any excuse to hammer him every time something goes wrong . He makes a goal line clearing header you then say Rodgers is a genius He was never going to do that though because he's a useless skin suit. The point is that the substitution invited them to attack and us to defend and our defence is currently our weakest suit. Unnecessary and I guarantee we don't drop back deep enough for that goal to happen without that change. 1
The_77 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 3 minutes ago, darko2k7 said: The sub literally made no difference to the result stop finding any excuse to hammer him every time something goes wrong . He makes a goal line clearing header you then say Rodgers is a genius You cannot possibly believe this.
Guest ttfn Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 1 minute ago, Koke said: We will lose to Randers... If we do it would be something else. They’ve not played for 2 months.
cityfanlee23 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 3 minutes ago, BigGibbo said: The player's turned a corner tonight. Rodger's couldn't unfortunately though. Don't hold your breath on that one 1
Popular Post Marshall Cockney Fox Posted 13 February 2022 Popular Post Posted 13 February 2022 That was tactically inept. The weakest part of our game is defending. So keep playing and retaining the ball with your midfield general. No justification for taking our game manager off for a lad who has proven to offer nothing in the defensive stakes. Absolutely criminal tactics 7
Chrysalis Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 5 minutes ago, darko2k7 said: The sub literally made no difference to the result stop finding any excuse to hammer him every time something goes wrong . He makes a goal line clearing header you then say Rodgers is a genius It invited pressure of course it did, he needs to stop these kind of subs in games we leading narrowly.
Oxfordfox83 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 5 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Still Rodgers in and I’m not sorry. Ok, I’ll bite. I like your posts. Why? What do you see in him? My only reservation in sacking him before the post match interview would be how much it will cost, but keeping him rather than bringing in a football manager will cost us players. Ndidi, Maddison, Ricardo, Barnes-are they really going to hang around in the summer to be coached like this? Let’s get some tactical nous in, get some good feelings going among our still excellent squad (easy to forget I know) and get people wanting to play here next season. 2
SlaneyLCFC Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Firmly in the "out" camp now. Vesty is toilet and Saints had our pants down for him.
darko2k7 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 2 minutes ago, Shane said: He shouldn't have even been on the pitch, it was the worst substitution he could have made. And yes it did cost us because Youri would have been in midfield to close them down and stop the build up leading to the corner. Youri could have also helped control the midfield for the last 7 minutes and seen the game out. Another terrible decision from Brendan which has cost us points. What like when youri kept us so cool in midfield against Spurs? You can not us what ifs could easily still have happened without the sub but we will never know
Facecloth Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 Just once I would love someone in the media to ask him why he continues to make that sub when it's clear it doesn't work. It either cost us or nearly cost us so many games in the last few years, it's a joke. Very nearly cost us the FA Cup final, bringing on an extra centre back to see it out. He hasn't learnt it doesn't work and I don't think he ever will. 2
Happy Fox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 If this game was a must win he’s surely gone cheerio Rodgers
Gav_LCFC14 Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 WTF is his obsession with changing shape to see out a game, even when it's completely uncalled for. 3
oadby.fox Posted 13 February 2022 Posted 13 February 2022 1 minute ago, BigGibbo said: He was never going to do that though because he's a useless skin suit. The point is that the substitution invited them to attack and us to defend and our defence is currently our weakest suit. Unnecessary and I guarantee we don't drop back deep enough for that goal to happen without that change. Not only that, but what kind of message does that change send out to the players after a half where they've played some of their best in ages? The shape was working and we were limiting their chances, why then change that shape to make room for someone who is objectively the worst defender/player we have in the squad? Even more, he's made similar changes recently and they've resulted in the same capitulations. He just does not learn. 1
Recommended Posts