Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, SecretPro said:

Who are the two having Scans? Please don't say Madders is one of them?

Rodgers said that madders had a twinge, which if you translate from Rodgersish means 3 months out 

  • Haha 3
Posted
4 hours ago, Fear Of The Fox said:

My first XI is suited for this game. Kante, Kovasic and Koulibaly are off, Alonso is not playing. We lock the midfield, they're going to play with 3 at the back. We just need to contain Mount, have Ndidi in front of our CBs and KDH doing the dirty job. Gallagher and Jorginho are unable to deploy gegenpress. Everytime they'll lose the ball they'll be extremely vulnerable to counter attack with both Vardy and Iheanacho making runs behind them especially if Tuchel goes with a high line. 

Tell Brendan Rodgers that because he isn’t going to have a clue otherwise 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Torten said:

Rodgers said that madders had a twinge, which if you translate from Rodgersish means 3 months out 

Are all these players nowadays made out of glass? It's not only our team with injuries. I've seen somewhere that the last 10yrs or something long term injuries are 300%-400% up compared to the 90's and early 00's. I'll try to find the source. 

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Try as I might I can’t see how we win tomorrow. It’s not that Chelsea are much good… they aren’t really.

Its that we are looking shite. Especially if Madders is out. Easily our best player currently.

I think we’ll score but we’ll concede more (the usual).

1-3 Chelsea 

Posted
9 hours ago, Fox92 said:

Just go at them, get in their faces. They haven't looked any good all season and Leeds rumbled them last week by not giving them any time on the ball.

 

Play two up top as well, not just Vardy on his own.

I mentioned during that Leeds/Chelsea game that I can just envisage us doing the total opposite of what Leeds did. We won't pressure Mendy even though that's what caused one of the goals.

We won't put any contained pressure on their defence or wing-backs, even though that was Chelsea's downfall.

We won't play quickly up through the pitch, even though Chelsea clearly couldn't cope.

We won't hassle them off the ball, even though Chelsea were clearly rattled by this.

 

It'll be severely disappointed that we won't do any of what Leeds found success with.

 

Like how other teams would see we were frail (to put it nicely) at crosses or set-pieces and capitalise on it, take advantage of it. We're just the opposite because of Rodgers' stubbornness. Rodgers plays his way and he's too proud and ignorant to see that other ways work and have been successful to overcome a specific type of opposition.

 

We're too generous of a side. We're too charitable. We'll gift goals to Sterling & Cucurella. We'll make the players that Chelsea want out look good - Ziyech & Pulisic for example.

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't know what's worse, the fact that I can't wait for this game to be over or that I'm going to watch it anyway even though I know how angry I'm going to be afterwards. 

 

I'm a somewhat rational and level headed man. Why do I put myself through something that I know makes me unreasonably angry? 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Scotch said:

I don't know what's worse, the fact that I can't wait for this game to be over or that I'm going to watch it anyway even though I know how angry I'm going to be afterwards. 

 

I'm a somewhat rational and level headed man. Why do I put myself through something that I know makes me unreasonably angry? 

Leeds beat them 3nil so not impossible but almost impossible we will get something from this, we have looked terrible so far.

Edited by whoareyaaa
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, stu said:

I think Brendan wants the sack if the team I’ve seen is correct.

 

This is the FT equivalent of a Facebook post like "so fed up rite nw," so I'll be the one that goes "u ok hun?"

 

What team is that then?

 

Edited by RoboFox
  • Haha 3
Posted

It’s a very strange pre-match feeling when you kind of despise your own team. It’s feels like I’ve caught a favourite nephew shagging the family Labrador ……. no matter how much you used to love him, you just can’t get past the sense of being seriously let-down 😞😞

Posted
3 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

The season is barely 3 weeks old and already we've a player out for 6 months minimum and 2 other players who have had to have scans to assess the severity of their injuries. AAAARRGGHHH

Don’t forget Bertrand appears to be bottom of the NHS waiting list for an op 😂 

  • Haha 4
Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, filbertway said:

Anyway we can get Rodgers banned from the touchline?

Wouldn't make any difference would it? He doesn't change anything or affect the game when we need him to anyway, he stands there clapping or sits writing notes.

Edited by FoxyJim1987
  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, stu said:

I think Brendan wants the sack if the team I’ve seen is correct.

From a mate I know who works at the club who has never been wrong yet hes told me the team and it ain't bad.

Posted (edited)

Routine win for Chelsea. Probably an early goal off a corner followed by another goal on about 60 minutes. We'll hardly get in their half. Brendan will say the boys worked hard and stayed in the game well before dropping in that it's hard without any new signings but he and his "honest boys" will do the best they can with what they have. 

Edited by Sunbury Fox
Posted
29 minutes ago, Lcfc-1992 said:

🇹🇷?

🇹🇷👎🏻

🇳🇬👎🏻

 

🇬🇭
🇧🇪

🇧🇪

🇧🇪

🇫🇷

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, FoxyJim1987 said:

From a mate I know who works at the club who has never been wrong yet hes told me the team and it ain't bad.

No consistency though. Doesn’t make sense to me.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...