Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Basildon Fox
Posted
4 minutes ago, shiv said:

 

What a load of old bollocks.  We can sign him fully as long as Lyon agree to terminate the loan.  That is the only stumbling block as Shaktar hold the players registration.

Posted

So possibly a loan till the end of the season and then a free transfer for next season as he’s out of contract?

 

if so that would be great business .

Posted

Dorsett must be talking bollocks otherwise Chelsea didn’t do their homework and spunked a lot on a guy they’ll only have for just over 5 months.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, frany104 said:

So possibly a loan till the end of the season and then a free transfer for next season as he’s out of contract?

 

if so that would be great business .

Not if he has a blinder and goes elsewhere on a free lol 

Posted

So what then? We compensate Lyon and can only sign Tete on a short term deal until the summer in which then he’s allowed to talk to other clubs IF his move here is successful?

 

Is that right or am I way off the mark?

Posted (edited)

What Dorsett is saying does make sense, in essence he would be swapping his short term deal with Lyon for a short term deal with us. What I don't understand is the option to buy with Lyon as that suggests the player can be purchased. 

Edited by Fox 4 Life
  • Like 1
Posted

Don’t see why they wouldn’t allow us to sign him permanently if we were willing and able to?!

 

Unless it’s something to do with Contract law, but surely it’s in everyone’s best interests 

Posted (edited)

I imagine we are planning to sign him permanently, rendering the short-term contract til June thing totally irrelevant and a moot point. 

 

Probably just Dorsett stirring shit up to make Sky get the clicks and views, creating the discussion out of nothing. 

 

I suspect we'd have heard more about our plans (if it was short term) from Romano. 

 

I also don't think our club is stupid enough to pay a big fee to Shakhtar just for 5 months and then send him back. I hope not anyway lol ... 

Edited by StanSP
  • Like 3
Posted

The only other sticking point is if he's played for Shakhtar and Lyon this season already. I think fifa rules dictate you can't play for more than 2 in one season. Unless the Ukraine thing put a stop to that... 

Posted
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

The only other sticking point is if he's played for Shakhtar and Lyon this season already. I think fifa rules dictate you can't play for more than 2 in one season. Unless the Ukraine thing put a stop to that... 

He's not played for Shaktar

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Trev39 said:

Still many reports of Leeds going for him, stay calm for now…

TalkSPORT not long said there’s nothing in it. Apparently it’s us and Everton interested.

Posted
16 minutes ago, lgfualol said:

Omg he's going to tear up the prem, become a free agent then **** off to someone else isnt he

If he helps keeps us up this year then who cares

Posted
1 minute ago, dobbylcfc said:

TalkSPORT not long said there’s nothing in it. Apparently it’s us and Everton interested.

That Romano bloke on twitter who everyone treats as gospel has said talks are in final stages, Leeds aren't focussed on Tete.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Fox 4 Life said:

Makes sense for Everton to be interested after Danjuma was stolen!

If Dyche gets a Brazilian winger before we do I think my brain will implode

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...