Tetê

[Vacamion]

 

If you are going to have one great game and be fairly anonymous for the rest of your time here, make it at the start.  Thanks for the Villa game.

 

Unless the coaching staff are seeing something unbelievable in training that we are not seeing, I think he has to be dropped.

 

I wanted to us sign Under quite a bit more than I want us to sign Tete.  I hope I'm wrong.

 

[sacreblueits442]

15 minutes ago, martyn said:

Plays like there is a big weight on his back.

 

Nothing is done with the sharpness needed, he doesn't move with fluidity, he doesn't manipulate the ball quickly enough and he takes too long with his decision making. 

 

Don't think he should see another minute really.

 

...Barnes when he first came into the team was a bit like a rabbit caught in a headlight!!!

You could see how he was unsure of what to do when given the space to run in on goal, perhaps this is a bigger step up for Tete, but we just do not have the time to hope he gets to acclimatize, I still think there is a very good player there.

[Guest nathan.]

2 minutes ago, Milo said:

Our non-scoring, non-dribbling, non-assisting lead booted non-winger, not a 10 not a 9, not an 8, not an anything-very-much player that was here for 3 years? 
 

Tete’s clearly not the answer, but I can’t be having this revisionism that Perez was actually any fkin good, either. 

Perez was average out wide.

 

Tete is awful.

[Tuna]

He's next to useless.

 

Like when you put a runner/athlete on the school footy team, runs around but can't do anything with the ball.

[SheppyFox]

We need to start against Everton with the 11 that finished against Leeds.

[Sampson]

7 minutes ago, Milo said:

Our non-scoring, non-dribbling, non-assisting lead booted non-winger, not a 10 not a 9, not an 8, not an anything-very-much player that was here for 3 years? 
 

Tete’s clearly not the answer, but I can’t be having this revisionism that Perez was actually any fkin good, either. 

Where did you get that from "we'd have been better playing Perez"? If anything it was a slight against Perez but saying Tete is even worse.

Like Perez is a 1 good game in every 8 type player, so far Tete has been a 1 good game in 12. I think we'd have definitely been better off keeping Perez.

[st albans fox]

The main problem tete has is that he isn’t quick enough 

so he will never manage in the PL because he will be out muscled in the contact 

[SafewayFox]

Put Madders in a roaming role on the right, and go two up top.

 

Hopefully that includes Kelechi but fear that’s his last involvement of the season.

[Fox 4 Life]

His lack of dribbling or attacking full backs is awful but he is a good passer and can move things along quickly going forward. Saying that he was pretty anynomous today. 

[splinterdream]

He ball watches, doesn’t make runs to create space, an option from off the bench, but that’s it for me 

[Clever Fox]

There's better wingers in the Championship and league 1. At least they'd have the tenacity to battle harder for the team.

[jim5000]

In hindsight, I would have rather have kept Albrighton and Perez than loan in Tete.

[Ian Nacho]

Only positive for him was his dad in the away end giving it the “come on Leicester, come on Leicester”

 

[An Sionnach]

18 minutes ago, sacreblueits442 said:

...Barnes when he first came into the team was a bit like a rabbit caught in a headlight!!!

You could see how he was unsure of what to do when given the space to run in on goal, perhaps this is a bigger step up for Tete, but we just do not have the time to hope he gets to acclimatize, I still think there is a very good player there.

You're right , we don't have time. You may have hitched your cart to the wrong horse here. A fixation with balance won't work in our situation . We need total commitment from all our players. A bench option from now on , he may have some impact then.

[Stadt]

I thought it was just Rodgers but yeah he’s not cut out for this level.

[Phenom]

24 minutes ago, nathan. said:

Perez was average out wide.

 

Tete is awful.

Revisionist history. Perez was not more effective than Tete

[Mawuli]

 

 

[sacreblueits442]

1 hour ago, Col city fan said:

I personally think we’ve seen Perez have some decent games and come on the pitch to be a positive influence. 
I see nothing in Tete to be honest. Today again he was just invisible for most of the game. Completely ineffective 

...we do not choose to go down the right too often!!!

For a long time, we have relied on Barnes to be the one to create chances and be a threat. Perez was more a stopgap for the right side, we were always looking for another Barnes on the right, let us not start eulogising Perez.

[red5]

So why is he constantly picked to play?

[Sampson]

6 minutes ago, red5 said:

So why is he constantly picked to play?

Because he’s our only right winger as we bizarrely decided to loan our other 2 out and leave us with zero other options.
 

If we want to play Barnes and Maddison at #10, we don’t have much choice.

Edited 25 April 2023 by Sampson

[Stephen Hughes]

Very slow and very lightweight. Seems to have a good touch and vision on him, but not working at the minute. Never goes past his defender.

[Miquel The Work Geordie]

Hes so bad ahahahha

[Buzzell]

At this point I would rather us try Praet on the wing again instead of Tetê.

[Buzzell]

30 minutes ago, Stephen Hughes said:

vision on him

His vision is also shit. He doesn’t play simple passes quick enough and would rather run himself into a dead end.

[Area88]

Tete is world class.

 

He will come good next game.