Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Will1981

Harry Winks

By Will1981, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

hebangsthedrums

hebangsthedrums

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, Merchant_Banker said:

I think he can be one of our best players when he is in the mood and playing in the right system and has the right players around him and has a manager who will put up with him. Otherwise he is a waste of space.

I'd win the F1 if I had the best car, setup the best way, with the best team strategist and a track suiting my skill level. (and all the other drivers were OAP's/children)

 

Lets not forgive and not forget, rather the team was built around Luke Thomas tbh

  • Like 1
Merchant_Banker

Merchant_Banker

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, hebangsthedrums said:

I'd win the F1 if I had the best car, setup the best way, with the best team strategist and a track suiting my skill level. (and all the other drivers were OAP's/children)

 

Lets not forgive and not forget, rather the team was built around Luke Thomas tbh

You’re making the same point I was trying to make. As per my last sentence, when everything is in his favour he can look good, when the pressure comes on he disappears.

  • Like 1
coolhandfox

coolhandfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, FoxinNotts said:

We can't afford to pay him. He'll have to move on

Not that simple, listening to the Fozcast about relegated clubs trying to off load player.

 

He explains in that scenario the player has all the power and your likely to have to sweeten the deal, by paying up some of their contracts to get rid.

FoxinNotts

FoxinNotts

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Not that simple, listening to the Fozcast about relegated clubs trying to off load player.

 

He explains in that scenario the player has all the power and your likely to have to sweeten the deal, by paying up some of their contracts to get rid.

Yeah, I get it. It's definitely not simple. Just saying, he has to go. We can't afford him. We'll have to pay him off, and write off a loss. He'll never play for us again, imo.

  • Like 1
Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted
Just now, FoxinNotts said:

Yeah, I get it. It's definitely not simple. Just saying, he has to go. We can't afford him. We'll have to pay him off, and write off a loss. He'll never play for us again, imo.

I think the club are going all or bust this year, I dont think they care who we can or cant afford, they will find some way of increasing the revenue to mean they can keep who they want to. Probably a few sales. 

FoxinNotts

FoxinNotts

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Foxin_Mad said:

I think the club are going all or bust this year, I dont think they care who we can or cant afford, they will find some way of increasing the revenue to mean they can keep who they want to. Probably a few sales. 

Yeah maybe, but he won't be staying. He won't play in league one. He'll think that level is below him. It probably is tbf. And he want's to be closer to his home. He'll engineer a move and the club will help him go too.

Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Yeah maybe, but he won't be staying. He won't play in league one. He'll think that level is below him. It probably is tbf. And he want's to be closer to his home. He'll engineer a move and the club will help him go too.

I can see Martin convincing him of the project, Enzo style but I guess time will tell. Id rather him and all the other dead wood be chopped, I just get the feeling the club are doubling down on their decisions with no consideration of if it doesn't work. 

  • Like 1
Tuna

Tuna

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, EastAnglianFox said:

Surely West Ham will be stupid enough to take him

Absolutely no logical reason why they would

HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, FoxinNotts said:

We can't afford to pay him. He'll have to move on

Contract triggered a one year extension when we were promoted

He should be exempt from SCMP  (3 years deal before 2025) and was on 40k to 45k and it will be cut even further 

Edited by HankMarvin
StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted

Get him gone any means necessary.

 

Trouble being that he's the kind of player that sits perfectly in Martin's possession-based system. 


Given his record of falling out with managers and not exactly setting the Championship on fire, what club in their right mind would take him?

pmcla26

pmcla26

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

Get him gone any means necessary.

 

Trouble being that he's the kind of player that sits perfectly in Martin's possession-based system. 


Given his record of falling out with managers and not exactly setting the Championship on fire, what club in their right mind would take him?

Could see him at Watford 

OntarioFox

OntarioFox

Posted
Posted

Anyone willing to give this melt another chance just because BTEC Brendan is here can, in the nicest possible terms, take a long walk off Skegness Pier.

Dames

Dames

Posted
Posted

Again I would just like to remind people that for the past 18 months Winks agent has been working tirelessly to get him away for the club and no one wants him. 
 

We are stuck with him until his contract ends. 

  • Like 2
Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted

If you get angry that Winks is still here, just remember Coady was probably on the same terms and got an additional year extension after we got promored so not only did we likely subsidise his wages last season but will also this season too.

Gamble92

Gamble92

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

If you get angry that Winks is still here, just remember Coady was probably on the same terms and got an additional year extension after we got promored so not only did we likely subsidise his wages last season but will also this season too.

Winks was reported as 60 risking to 90k with promotion and Coady 50k. Still hideous wages to be handing out for the Championship and to give a player like Coady an extension when he didn't even play that often in the league below. 

 

I sit in a dark room every night and think about every aspect of this decline. I can't remember the last time I bothered to heat up baked beans. Straight from the tin on the floor. Wife left me, took the kids. Still, least we have Martin. 

  • Haha 2
Corky

Corky

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Gamble92 said:

Winks was reported as 60 risking to 90k with promotion and Coady 50k. Still hideous wages to be handing out for the Championship and to give a player like Coady an extension when he didn't even play that often in the league below. 

 

I sit in a dark room every night and think about every aspect of this decline. I can't remember the last time I bothered to heat up baked beans. Straight from the tin on the floor. Wife left me, took the kids. Still, least we have Martin. 

I read the second paragraph in Mike Skinner's voice.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Foxin_Mad

Foxin_Mad

Posted
Posted

Tbf it isn’t any of the players on stupid contracts fault, if someone offers more pay you take it. The issue here is that Jon Rudkin is a prize twat of the highest order, and still in place making football decisions. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...