Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
moore_94

EFL Statement - Club has no obligation to submit and agree business plan

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, whetstonefox said:

IMG_7899.png

But we sold Maddison and Barnes, and barely spent anything. 
 

So, surely that can’t constitute significant breaches. 
 

Percy isn’t as in touch as he used to be with us, this is speculation based on what he thinks rather than knows surely? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would we sell? KDH and Hermansen? Plus if clubs know we have to sell why would they push it with us against the wall?

 

Good luck getting much money in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what is perfectly clear is that our needless relegation has put us in a right world of shit and those responsible, some still at the club, should hang their heads in shame.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Foxontherocks said:

How does it work then if we get promoted, finalize our accounts in June, the EFL look at them and find we breached the rules. 10 point deduction waiting for us on return or points deduction in the prem?

Unless we can sell players before then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Are Percy articles acceptable @Babylon?

 

Just want to know before everyone sets off talking about this and you start crying again.

 

The key point is how much Leicester’s losses were in the 2022-23 season when they were still in the Premier League.” He doesn’t know the answer himself. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tuna said:

I think what is perfectly clear is that our needless relegation has put us in a right world of shit and those responsible, some still at the club, should hang their heads in shame.

Yea, but if we have a go in the FA cup, doesn’t matter does it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pliskin said:

But we sold Maddison and Barnes, and barely spent anything. 
 

So, surely that can’t constitute significant breaches. 
 

Percy isn’t as in touch as he used to be with us, this is speculation based on what he thinks rather than knows surely? 

And could've sold KDH in January, but didn't. Surely if things were that bleak KDH would've gone.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Golden Fox said:

The EFL was defending and pulled up as they thought it was no touch icing. But no ref blew, so Leicester just nonchalantly regained possession of the puck and carried on.

As someone who's never watched Ice Hockey I can't relate, but thanks 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John P tweet is a bit silly.

 

Club needs to sale blah blah.

 

Followed by key point is what the 22/23 accounts look like.

 

So basically he's doesn't have that facts about our finances for 22/23.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tommy G said:

The accounts will be out in about a month and I think I’ll refrain from even opening the thread - too painful to read the commentary.

You know you will pick that scab 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Babylon said:

The key point is how much Leicester’s losses were in the 2022-23 season when they were still in the Premier League.” He doesn’t know the answer himself. 

It very much appears to be a speculative article. He’s made the assumption something just be off, so has written about it. Like you say, he doesn’t know. It’s not like the club will refuse to comply with the EFL, but will happily hand over said documents to John Percy to scrutinise. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, coolhandfox said:

John P tweet is a bit silly.

 

Club needs to sale blah blah.

 

Followed by key point is what the 22/23 accounts look like.

 

So basically he's doesn't have that facts about our finances for 22/23.

No one does apart from the board and our auditors as it stands 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Scotch said:

That doesn't make much sense though, does it? 

 

If it was purely our finances from THIS season then "we were in the PL" wouldn't be a viable defense which it clearly is, given that an independent panel have sided with us. Also, if that were the case, the EFL wouldn't now be looking to change the rules and sync their financial report times with the EPL. 

 

...So it MUST account for at least SOME of our finances whilst in the PL, no?

It's this years accounts that have been projected.

Basically by the technicality you can only break ffp a season behind so leicester can ignore it as in the prem (which we were last season) they'd be fine but not in the championship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Foxontherocks said:

How does it work then if we get promoted, finalize our accounts in June, the EFL look at them and find we breached the rules. 10 point deduction waiting for us on return or points deduction in the prem?

Does it work how it is intended to in the Prem this season? 
 

Ie. Breaches are punished in the year they occurred, so could we get a points deduction this season. If we are found to have breached the rules for this year? 
 

or does it work differently in the Champ? 
 


 

aprreciate this report is to do with last March’s findings.  But what about this years submission? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Babylon said:

The key point is how much Leicester’s losses were in the 2022-23 season when they were still in the Premier League.” He doesn’t know the answer himself. 

Sounds like slam dunk in terms of nobody knows just yet- 22/23 are key I am sure, and our actions of last season didn’t seem like club being gung ho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

@Babylon will likely know….. but just because  of this news today, it doesn’t automatically mean we’re trying to hide something as a club or we’re trying to buy some extra time because we’ve failed to comply. 
 

As a business, if there’s a loophole that would benefit you, you take it surely? That’s what rights and entitlements are for, and If legally the EFL have no stance on it, then it should be utilised. If they decide to change their rules as a result, so be it…. It’s more a problem for them anyway as it’s their regulations and their lack of foresight . 

But, from what’s been said, why should our accounts be scrutinised by the EFL when we’ve just spent so many seasons in the PL, surely it isn’t fair? Is there a grace period? Do you get time to adjust to the championship because you’re going to be coming down with a massive outgoing if you’re an established PL club surely? 

 

They have a set date in their own rules, we were a prem club on the date and not an EFL club. 
 

The club argued successfully that the rules clearly down apply to clubs not in the league. 
 

The decision was unanimous, we were correct. And our first reporting season for the EFL is this season, our first one in it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, whetstonefox said:

If Maddison and Barnes are included in 22/23 I can’t see how we fail FFP in that regard unless there is some other unknown calamity 

It might depend on whether we got all the money up front. Most player sales are staggered over a period of time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...