westernpark Posted 20 August 2024 Posted 20 August 2024 2 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: Andersen is a centre half, why would that impact selling a forward I think we’re all clutching at straws with Ayew.
FrankieADZ Posted 20 August 2024 Posted 20 August 2024 9 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: Andersen is a centre half, why would that impact selling a forward money, maybe they wont need too now.. yes im clutching at straws
CloudFox Posted 20 August 2024 Posted 20 August 2024 53 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said: if this stop ayew moving then im all for it This seems like such a strange move. Sideways at best, surely?
Super_horns Posted 20 August 2024 Posted 20 August 2024 Just now, CloudFox said: This seems like such a strange move. Sideways at best, surely? Been there before too . Presume it means Guehi stays ? 1
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 20 August 2024 Posted 20 August 2024 19 minutes ago, CloudFox said: This seems like such a strange move. Sideways at best, surely? 5 year deal for the player, that takes him to 33/34. And if you don’t sign someone for £30 million without a comparably expensive weekly wage so, it’s a retirement deal that can’t really be refused by Andersen.
StriderHiryu Posted 20 August 2024 Posted 20 August 2024 1 hour ago, Chrysalis said: Build the team in championship, great prices we paid for Mahrez and Vardy. This was suggested by Benjamin Bloom who has a great Championship podcast too. If Mads, Fatawu and Mavididi step up you might have a point. 2
Lambert09 Posted 20 August 2024 Posted 20 August 2024 Broja to ipswich in a strange deal. Obligation in place but broja hasn’t agreed the deal, so if they stay up he can still say no to them, or them just low ball him to get out of it. Daft from chelsea really.
dmayne7 Posted 20 August 2024 Posted 20 August 2024 3 minutes ago, Lambert09 said: Broja to ipswich in a strange deal. Obligation in place but broja hasn’t agreed the deal, so if they stay up he can still say no to them, or them just low ball him to get out of it. Daft from chelsea really. So it won't actually be an obligation, rather an option to buy. But journalists are reporting that as an obligation; can't beat football journalists for their intelligence 2
shen Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 1 minute ago, CloudFox said: This seems like such a strange move. Sideways at best, surely? Payrise and sign-on I presume. But yes, difficult to argue otherwise. 1
FrankieADZ Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 7 hours ago, Super_horns said: Been there before too . Presume it means Guehi stays ? youd think so, take over 70mil youd think now 1
fkas Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 36 minutes ago, shen said: Payrise and sign-on I presume. But yes, difficult to argue otherwise. Signing on fee, pay rise, security of a long term contract and won't have to move house, change the kids school etc. No life admin required. Still playing Premiership football.
Phenom Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 8 hours ago, Lambert09 said: Broja to ipswich in a strange deal. Obligation in place but broja hasn’t agreed the deal, so if they stay up he can still say no to them, or them just low ball him to get out of it. Daft from chelsea really. Where did you hear that?
Super_horns Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 9 hours ago, dmayne7 said: So it won't actually be an obligation, rather an option to buy. But journalists are reporting that as an obligation; can't beat football journalists for their intelligence Must be a clause or two in it saying if he is rubbish but they stay up Ipswich don't have to sign him?
MGLCFC Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Super_horns said: Must be a clause or two in it saying if he is rubbish but they stay up Ipswich don't have to sign him? Wouldn't that mean the deal would just be an option to buy - similar to what most Italian clubs choose, then don't bother pursuing it or try to knock down the transfer fee? Edited 21 August 2024 by MGLCFC 1
pmcla26 Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 11 hours ago, FrankieADZ said: if this stop ayew moving then im all for it Palace are going to be crap this season, Guehi and Anderson will both need replacing and surely means Eze will push for a move late in the window now. Olise, Guehi, Anderson and Eze all in one window. Wow.
fox_favourite Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 (edited) Football is truly broken Edited 21 August 2024 by fox_favourite 4
Super_horns Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 (edited) 26 minutes ago, MGLCFC said: Wouldn't that mean the deal would just be an option to buy - similar to what most Italian clubs choose, then don't bother pursuing it or try to knock down the transfer fee? Yes guess so. Maybe the media have it wrong. 22 minutes ago, pmcla26 said: Palace are going to be crap this season, Guehi and Anderson will both need replacing and surely means Eze will push for a move late in the window now. Olise, Guehi, Anderson and Eze all in one window. Wow. Been linked with a few but you'd think they would want to to be certain of getting them first. Ipswich got 3 players on loan now - presume one will have to miss out in the match day squad as you are only allowed 2 apparently. They are: - Premier League clubs may not register more than two players on loan at any one time. - The maximum number of loans registrable in the same season is four, and, under no circumstances, shall more than one be from the same club at any one time. - Premier League clubs cannot loan to another Premier League club a player they have acquired in the same transfer window. - A Premier League club may loan not more than one of its goalkeepers to another Premier League club. Edited 21 August 2024 by Super_horns
-sodapop Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 18 minutes ago, fox_favourite said: Football is truly broken The crazy thing is, as far as I can tell this is so that Atletico Madrid has the money to sign Gallagher; which because he's homegrown makes this deal worthwhile for them balancing their books. Disgusting club, I really wish nothing but the worst for them. 2
goose2010 Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 20 minutes ago, fox_favourite said: Football is truly broken Saw a stat today that they have 191 years of contracts and their books within the playing squad. The second in that list is Spurs on 97! It is utterly ridiculous
MGLCFC Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 2 minutes ago, goose2010 said: Saw a stat today that they have 191 years of contracts and their books within the playing squad. The second in that list is Spurs on 97! That will probably equate to over £1 billion in wages - How do they get away with it?
FrankieADZ Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 27 minutes ago, pmcla26 said: Palace are going to be crap this season, Guehi and Anderson will both need replacing and surely means Eze will push for a move late in the window now. Olise, Guehi, Anderson and Eze all in one window. Wow. yes and no, i dont think Newcastle will pay over £70mil for Guehi and Eze's release clause fee has now passed, i cant imagine anyone paying over £70mil each for them too
slymunn Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 7 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said: yes and no, i dont think Newcastle will pay over £70mil for Guehi and Eze's release clause fee has now passed, i cant imagine anyone paying over £70mil each for them too Man City may pay 70mil for Eze, using the Alvarez money. They was linked with him at the end of last week.
StanSP Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 I can't fathom Andersen moving to Fulham. And where do Fulham get their money from? 3 big signings - ESR, Andersen and Berge.
Samilktray Posted 21 August 2024 Posted 21 August 2024 Just now, StanSP said: I can't fathom Andersen moving to Fulham. And where do Fulham get their money from? 3 big signings - ESR, Andersen and Berge. The bloke who owns them is the guy who owns the wrestling or something, must be fairly wealthy
Recommended Posts