Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I notice the teams doing well are the ones who have built over a number of years (Cov, Mid, Mil, Bris) or have managers who are good strategists (Stoke, Cha). Clubs with any form of chaos seem to be struggling. Which further reinforces why we should be playing the long game to get the club on a stable platform 

  • Like 4
Posted
Just now, Lionator said:

I notice the teams doing well are the ones who have built over a number of years (Cov, Mid, Mil, Bris) or have managers who are good strategists (Stoke, Cha). Clubs with any form of chaos seem to be struggling. Which further reinforces why we should be playing the long game to get the club on a stable platform 

Hull appointed a new manager in the summer, have had a transfer embargo, and are above us. QPR's new manager replaced our manager and they're above us.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Our manager is one of the shitest in the division, he has done nothing to convince me otherwise. Stability maybe 5 years or being like Stoke at best with this absolute chancer. The Premier League will soon be a distant dream, probabaly not seen again for many. 

Edited by Foxin_Mad
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

QPR is a bad example though, because simply by signing Kone they've turned themselves into playoff contenders. Turns out you can have a bang-average squad and still excel if you know where the goal is.

 

Hull have pulled a similar coup with the wise signing of McBurnie on a free, who is proven to be good at this level.  Not claiming he's on the level of Kone, but he's already dragged Hull through a few games with his contributions. Six goals, four assists in ten games and player of the month in September. Our forward line could never. And we were comfortably beaten by them even with him out with a knock. Grim.

Edited by OntarioFox
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Fox92 said:

Hull appointed a new manager in the summer, have had a transfer embargo, and are above us. QPR's new manager replaced our manager and they're above us.

Hull and QPR won’t be getting promoted. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Lionator said:

Hull and QPR won’t be getting promoted. 

Niether will Charlton and Stoke but you included them. The teams you mentioned are currently above us, as are Hull and QPR which is why I brought them into it.

Posted
6 hours ago, Fox92 said:

Ipswich are the most surprising out of every team I think and it's interesting to see if McKenna can turn it around. Back to promotions is always an unbelievable achievement but the second promotion sort of rides of the first promotion. He is now experiencing defeats/loss of form which is always the most testing of a manager.

 

But lets not forget they did concede a lot when they got promoted previously, and often outscored opposition. 

I'm a Town supporter.

We bought 11 players over the summer. The B2B team is no more. Only Davis remains. We seem to have some good players. It is getting them into an effective team that seems to be the hold up.

KMcK's teams wil always attack as first default. That will always leave space at the back. 3-2 rather than 1-0.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, goose2010 said:

I think Southampton and especially Ipswich's starts are more surprising then ours. 

 

 

Apparently Ipswich got rid of most of their promotion team already, so perhaps for them not surprising, they got rid of all the hunger and hard working players.  Left with higher paid merc's like we and saints have.

Posted (edited)

I say it again I wasn’t overly impressed with cov.(when we played them) But they have goals all over the pitch. We don’t have goals anywhere at the minute. Seem to be going from strength to strength. 

Edited by teblin
  • Like 1
Posted

Such a strange situation. He threw so much at them when he first got there. Made the play offs twice but couldn't get any further and then investment stopped.

Posted

Realistically, what happens now? Is it that the administrators call the play on accepting takeover bids then instead of Chansari throwing them all away as he won't make his monty back, or are they in too much of a hole at this point? 

 

They have 5 transfer embargo's too. They could drop 3 divisions easily if they stayed in business from that alone surely? 

Posted
4 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

Is it that strange?

 

Thai man-child nepo baby decided to pull the plug when things started going against him and has only ever refused to do the right thing out of stubbornness or ego and will sack anyone who questions it.

 

It all sounds incredibly familiar to me.

Maybe strange was the wrong word but he initially invested a lot and then pulled it all after two decent seasons (although they should have gone up with what they invested). 

 

I don't know all the ins and outs about who he has got rid of, or not, from the board/staff etc.

 

It is time people like this are stopped from buying clubs but how can they considering all he invented initially? 

Posted

Seems like Wednesday fans are of the view they will take this if it is finally the end of Chansiri!

 

Does anyone with more understanding know what this means in reality? Obviously they will drop down a league or even 2. But if there is a buyer, presumably he is forced to relinquish the club now and it won’t mean they cease to exist?

 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Mike Ashley been linked - guess it’s better than no one .

 

Hopefully they can pull through.

Ashley is an arsehole but he will stabilise the club, when he owned Newcastle finance wise they were sound it was just his decision making that was weak. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...