Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, An Away Move said:

I don’t get the Leicester dislike for Doyle. He was an important part of Maresca’s tactical play. It was literally his job to carry the ball forwards and link midfield or attack from

defence. That meant he was sometimes out of position when the transition broke down. That doesn’t make him slow or crap. I thought he did a great job for us before he got injured.  Wrexham have got a good player. I think he’d have strengthened us too. 

He was slow though? Like running through treacle. 

Posted
37 minutes ago, An Away Move said:

I don’t get the Leicester dislike for Doyle. He was an important part of Maresca’s tactical play. It was literally his job to carry the ball forwards and link midfield or attack from

defence. That meant he was sometimes out of position when the transition broke down. That doesn’t make him slow or crap. I thought he did a great job for us before he got injured.  Wrexham have got a good player. I think he’d have strengthened us too. 

I know he was injured but he played fewer than half of games that season and we were fine without him. We lack pace in our back line, Doyle won’t improve that weakness. 

  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, An Away Move said:

I don’t get the Leicester dislike for Doyle. He was an important part of Maresca’s tactical play. It was literally his job to carry the ball forwards and link midfield or attack from

defence. That meant he was sometimes out of position when the transition broke down. That doesn’t make him slow or crap. I thought he did a great job for us before he got injured.  Wrexham have got a good player. I think he’d have strengthened us too. 

I agree, at this level hes an excellent player, certainly better than any of our left sided defenders.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

He was slow though? Like running through treacle. 

Especially when moving laterally, or backpedalling. Wingers could step inside or outside of him so easily. 

  • Like 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, An Away Move said:

I don’t get the Leicester dislike for Doyle. He was an important part of Maresca’s tactical play. It was literally his job to carry the ball forwards and link midfield or attack from

defence. That meant he was sometimes out of position when the transition broke down. That doesn’t make him slow or crap. I thought he did a great job for us before he got injured.  Wrexham have got a good player. I think he’d have strengthened us too. 

Great on the ball but offers nothing physically and his positioning was a constant let down.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

He was slow though? Like running through treacle. 

I actually think he'd give Vestergaard a run for his money which is embarrassing for a 21 year old.

Posted
50 minutes ago, An Away Move said:

I don’t get the Leicester dislike for Doyle. He was an important part of Maresca’s tactical play. It was literally his job to carry the ball forwards and link midfield or attack from

defence. That meant he was sometimes out of position when the transition broke down. That doesn’t make him slow or crap. I thought he did a great job for us before he got injured.  Wrexham have got a good player. I think he’d have strengthened us too. 

He was a good player, definitely not crap.

 

But my god was he slow, I don't know how anyone who watched a lot of him can think otherwise - Watching him in a full sprint was painful.

Posted

When I first saw him here I thought, maybe he was just a bit rusty, then after a few games I realised, nope, just not that good.

Posted
On 07/08/2025 at 09:29, UniFox21 said:

He was great in that LCB/LB role tucking in, when we had a back 3. Probably too slow for an attacking fullback

Haha it's the opposite for me, I thought he looked gash there, it exposed his massive lack of pace. 

 

Can tell there's a defender in there, but sticking him out wide where he's going to face quick attackers 1 on 1 made him look worse than he was.

  • Like 4
Posted
13 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Great on the ball, lovely left foot.

 

Needs to play at CB.

 

8m is a lot of money 

There was a certain diagonal pass he could make that was exquisite. But the 2nd goal we conceded on Saturday provided enough proof - as if we needed it - that another slow CB is not what we need.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

 

 

My god, they are over hyping it. He was decent for us but not that good and didn't he have a mixed loan spell at Norwich? It's like they have signed prime Wes Morgan or prime Tunchev. 

 

Also according to them, Derby had a great window as well lol

Edited by fox_favourite
Posted

To be fair that's a good signing for them imo. There's obviously some potential there and at the moment they're just looking to establish themselves as a Championship side. This one at least has a potential sell on at some point whereas the likes of Coady won't.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...