Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, fox_favourite said:

Here's a a concern I have....will many away pitches be good enough to play passing football? I would say no. 

 

Passing for passing sake will not get us out of this league. A manager that thinks hes better than he is, that plays a brand of football that is boring, that relies on teams coming at us so we can open them up. It isn't made for League 1 one bit. 

 

Stupid appointment if true 

It will suit our opposition to the ground. They have 11 behind the ball. Wait for the mistake and exploit on the counter attack. 
 

This gamble shows no acknowledgement of the serious work the squad needs doing. We have no senior right back, we are short in midfield, we have no striker. Alongside the various players that aren’t capable of this style. Aiyawatt probably listening to players again about passing style 

  • Like 1
Posted

The club had a chance to try get some fans back on side by going for someone that wasn’t the same kind of shite we have been linked to but will be going for the easy boring shite option instead 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, JimJams said:

The thing is though, he holds no fxxking cards.  His stock is rock bottom.  Absolutely nobody wants him except for us.  And we're a 3rd tier club being run worse than a pub team.

That is true. However I'd put Aiyawatt and Rudkin at this point far below even him. To them, it would be seen as a coup.

 

That's their entire ethos. Throw money we don't actually have to try and patch things up. It's never building anything up from the ground.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nods said:

It almost certainly will not work. 

 

I just don't understand this obsession with possession. Why? For what reason? I don't even hate it when it's effective, and I was among Maresca's biggest advocates when the tide was turning against him here. 

 

But when it hasn't worked for years and the fanbase aren't getting behind it, what's the point in doubling down on it? 

The last time we played "possession football" was with Maresca when we got promoted, Cooper, Ruud and Rowett were not possession managers and they got us relegated, Marti was more of a possession manager than them but he'd still have games with 30-40% possession. So the only point is that the fanbase aren't getting behind it, not that it "hasn't worked for years"

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted

Besides the obvious problems, it’s taken this long to appoint their unemployed first choice manager - why couldn’t this have happened weeks ago? 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

When I think I can't get any angrier with this club they do something like this.  We are the absolute pits.  I can only think that it's got to the point where Top and Rudkin are doing this to spite us as some kind of revenge for protesting.  There is no way either of them have the best interests of the club at heart and they're proving it with every decision.

Posted (edited)

We would be better off if Top and Rudkin decided on who would be their absolute last choice manager was and we appointed him (or her).

Edited by Unabomber
Posted
15 minutes ago, fox_favourite said:

Here's a a concern I have....will many away pitches be good enough to play passing football? I would say no. 

 

Passing for passing sake will not get us out of this league. A manager that thinks hes better than he is, that plays a brand of football that is boring, that relies on teams coming at us so we can open them up. It isn't made for League 1 one bit. 

 

Stupid appointment if true 

That's your concern?  Pitches?

Posted
2 minutes ago, ktfoxes said:

The last time we played "possession football" was with Maresca when we got promoted, Cooper, Ruud and Rowett were not possession managers and they got us relegated, Marti was more of a possession manager than them but he'd still have games with 30-40% possession. So the only point is that the fanbase aren't getting behind it, not that it "hasn't worked for years"

They absolutely were slow and short build up managers, it’s just we were shit do didn’t have more possession. It’s a coaching choice rather than a statistical one

  • Like 2
Posted

Are people really surprised? All we've seen for the past few seasons is these morons making the same stupid decisions over and over again while completely disregarding the opinions of the fanbase as they do so. 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, murphy said:

That's your concern?  Pitches?

One. But I've posted a lot of my thoughts on Ricky Martin, so that was another to add to the list. 

 

He's a fraud. The lack of self awareness from the club is astonishing 

Edited by fox_favourite
  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, ktfoxes said:

The last time we played "possession football" was with Maresca when we got promoted, Cooper, Ruud and Rowett were not possession managers and they got us relegated, Marti was more of a possession manager than them but he'd still have games with 30-40% possession. So the only point is that the fanbase aren't getting behind it, not that it "hasn't worked for years"

Ruud was and Rowett was an emergency caretaker under whom nothing really changed. 

 

The only exception is Cooper. He had to go, but Ruud wasn't the answer.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Mike Oxlong said:

Tits ! 

 

IMG_7375.thumb.jpeg.8bed5119610b6e6c6043ea9a614782aa.jpeg

Christ on a bike how could I forget

 

Lost a lot of time to her in my younger days…

 

If it is Brussell I just hope it’s sorted soon and the coaching staff are overhauled and sorted ASAP.

 

Get rid of Sadler, King and Hughes and actually sign a Fitness coach and GK coach. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...