Father Ted Posted 11 July 2013 Posted 11 July 2013 I'd personally have Waghorn ahead of Nugent in the pecking order if fully fit.
Finnegan Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 I'd personally have Waghorn ahead of Nugent in the pecking order if fully fit. ... Jesus.
ollieton Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 I'd personally have Waghorn ahead of Nugent in the pecking order if fully fit.
_Fatboyslow_ Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 Which way should we go with Waghorn ? It really depends on what role you see him for filing in the team/squad. As a starting striker I feel that he is not clinical enough, certainly not enough to make us a top 3 side. As cover or an option on the bench then yes I can see that, especially when defending from the front, he has loads of energy and chases the ball and can hold it as well, but is this a role he is happy with ? Maybe not as this why he left Sunderland in the first place as he wanted first team football, maybe he wants a starting place ? This said the real question is is this his best role ? should we be playing him a little deeper as support to the strikers or as a attacking midfielder ? I for one have always felt that would be his best position, but we do have a fair bit of competition in this area and it could well be he wants a start as opposed to being a part of the squad. He can take a good corner and free kick, he is dynamic and most of the time wants the ball. It also would depend on if he moves on, would we bring someone in and if so who that player is.
Collymore Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 It's true that Steve Bruce still has a smile wrinkle etched on his face from this transfer. It's the one that goes from the corner of his mouth right up to his ear.
Happy Fox Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/story-19511720-detail/story.html?#axzz2YifQBwLt Several Championship clubs are interested in signing Leicester City striker Martyn Waghorn. Millwall and Blackburn are thought to be two of the clubs in the race to land the 23-year-old frontman. Waghorn was far from a regular starter last season at the King Power Stadium and has a year left on his contract. The England Under-21 international has been made available, but it is understood that City are reluctant to sell him too cheaply, holding out for a large chunk of the £1.7million they paid for him three years ago.
dannythefox Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 Good player a few seasons ago and did well last season when he got a chance would prefer to keep him than Vardy but he's needs to be playing Regular football so good luck to him
Bayfox Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 yorkshire evening post reporting wolves bid but suggesting bolton may want him as well.
FoxyPalace.com Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 BBBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLTTTTTTTTTTTTOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNNNN
MPH Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 I'd only sell to Bolton if they promised to still sign Beckford!!!
NathanC93 Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 Don't want him to go but I would hope we get around 1m for him, doubt we would though!
Fox92 Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 Why would Blackburn, and especially Bolton, want him? Both of their squads are good and I can't see him being anything other than what he is here at either one of those clubs.
foxfanazer Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 There haven't been many if any players I've wanted to succeed here more than Waggy. Loved him the season we had him on loan and was pleased when we signed him, albeit the price we paid was obscene. Showed glimpses of his class but like most leicester players he is horrendously inconsistent. That could be down to how we've used him or that's just him. Anyway I think he could go somewhere and do well for himself. Good luck to him
_Fatboyslow_ Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 I'd only sell to Bolton if they promised to still sign Beckford!!! Let them have Danns for free I'd only sell to Bolton if they promised to still sign Beckford!!! Let them have Danns for free
seenitall Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 He'll go somewhere, get an injury free run in the team and be worth millions again. This is not a Beckford thread
Tommoran Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 He can happily go, hits everything over the bar! Still think we do need one more striker as I don't rate either futacs or vardy.
SmithyFox12 Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 He can happily go, hits everything over the bar! Still think we do need one more striker as I don't rate either futacs or vardy. Apart from his goal tonight, yeah?
David Guiza Posted 12 July 2013 Posted 12 July 2013 He's a better option, in my opinion than, than both Futacs and Vardy, but I would still let him go for any kind of decent fee that we can get. Ideally i'd prefer Wood, Nugent, Schlupp and one other as the 4 forwards, but I can't see that happening unfortunately.
Bayfox Posted 13 July 2013 Posted 13 July 2013 Now that would be a signing... he's already gone man city.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.