hackneyfox Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 No he didn't. OK, so picking Vardy and Drinkwater, and leaving Albrighton and Hammond on the bench were not good selections. But he got more or less everything else right. And the substitutions were excellent. The substitutions worked because he's picked the almost the worst starting eleven that he could. Vardy, Drinkwater & King shouldn't have been near the starting eleven. Playing a right footed De Laet on the left made it easy for Man U to defend against as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 You will get slandered by the Pearsonites for that. Also you will be called a "Troll" for expressing your beliefs.. by the same dim witted people. They are a sad bunch of oinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col city fan Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Also you will be called a "Troll" for expressing your beliefs.. by the same dim witted people. They are a sad bunch of oinks. Indeed... The old 'trolling' term, used for anyone who doesn't agree with the masses and toe the party line. Pathetic really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cambridgefox Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Does anyone actually know what happened?it seems not.Thats a few minutes I wont get back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooseBreath Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 No he didn't. OK, so picking Vardy and Drinkwater, and leaving Albrighton and Hammond on the bench were not good selections. But he got more or less everything else right. And the substitutions were excellent. Straight 442 was questionable. Schwarzer was questionable. RDL at LB was questionable. Simpson questionable. Wes questionable. King questionable Schlupp questionable. Levels of motivation questionable. Levels of concentration questionable. Ability to take set pieces questionable. What did he get right exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagworthblue Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 No he didn't. OK, so picking Vardy and Drinkwater, and leaving Albrighton and Hammond on the bench were not good selections. But he got more or less everything else right. And the substitutions were excellent. Agree with this. He got things wrong today and maybe he has on a few occasions. Or did he? Had we played Hammond and Albrighton which I would have done, would we have lost 4-1? Would we have won? For the last how many years the answer has been change the manager - the grass is greener but it wasn't greener. It rarely is long term. Stability is far more crucial long term as long as you have someone in place that can do the job well over time. I believe in Pearson we have such a man. He is learning about this league and it may take going down and coming back in a year (or 2 or 3) stronger before we become a stable prem team. Short termism doesn't work in any part of life. It may have a short term effect but we need to plan long term.10 wins is what you need to survive in the prem on average. We could still survive but even if we finish 17th, a lot will still be calling for a change of manager because 17th wasn't good enough or we were lucky This isn't blindly sticking by Pearson. This is considered strategic thinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claridge Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Straight 442 was questionable. Schwarzer was questionable. RDL at LB was questionable. Simpson questionable. Wes questionable. King questionable Schlupp questionable. Levels of motivation questionable. Levels of concentration questionable. Ability to take set pieces questionable. What did he get right exactly? Schlupp questionable .been excellent lately Agree with the others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 They should sing about Leicester then, that's who I'm loyal to.Exactly thisLeicester til I die Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wight88 Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 So there was a dust up in the stands between our own fans? I'm guessing not then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Fynwy Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 So there was a dust up in the stands between our own fans? I'm guessing not then... I believe there was fighting at the end of the game but I gave my ticket to my niece today so don't know the extent of it, my wife said that some fat baldy blokes set on Maybes and some others from FT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretPro Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 No he didn't. OK, so picking Vardy and Drinkwater, and leaving Albrighton and Hammond on the bench were not good selections. But he got more or less everything else right. And the substitutions were excellent. Albrighton substitution looked great because he should have started the game to begin with. I also wouldn't say bringing on a pin point crosser and taking off your main target man is an excellent decision. Nugent looked OK when he came on, he usually does, but today was due to some decent passing from Albrighton - so Kramaric probably would have gotten a boost if he'd have stayed on the pitch with somebody willing to provide him with a pass. But as you say, starting with Vardy on the wing (again) and statsitically the worst pairing in centre mid, leaving your in-form creative player on the bench isn't much of a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScouseFox Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 i'll fight anyone who questions nige Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFS Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 It happened at West Ham too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 I strongly support the club, which is bigger than any one man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScouseFox Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Straight 442 was questionable. Schwarzer was questionable. RDL at LB was questionable. Simpson questionable. Wes questionable. King questionable Schlupp questionable. Levels of motivation questionable. Levels of concentration questionable. Ability to take set pieces questionable. What did he get right exactly? de laet/konchesky is ****ing one sided on here, schlupp's been our best player for about 6 weeks, simpson's been better than de laet, schwarzer/hamer much of a muchness, the rest is bullshit. in fact so was the start. your post is bullshit. try again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unabomber Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Guarantee the person fans would beat the person outers in a fight no weapons allowed neutral venue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKCJ Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Do find this annoying, singing it when we lose just to make a point to those who dare to question him. These people suffer from the same blind loyalty that see's us playing Vardy on a wing and Drinkwater in the middle and Wes at the back. Yeah, imagine wanting to support the club. Seriously, do one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MooseBreath Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 de laet/konchesky is ****ing one sided on here, schlupp's been our best player for about 6 weeks, simpson's been better than de laet, schwarzer/hamer much of a muchness, the rest is bullshit. in fact so was the start. your post is bullshit. try again.Righto, if you were happy with the levels of motivation and concentration then I'm guessing you didn't watch the game because they were diabolical. RDL isn't a left back. He can't use his left foot. He should have set Kramaric away in the first half but didn't because all he can do from left back is move horizontally inside and then pass it. Konch is dog too but can we really say nige got it right, not really. Schawarzer/Hamer much of a muchness. Hamer barely any mistakes, Schwarzer played one league game already has one mistake leading to a goal to his name. Wes, King both questionable selections. 442 over 451 at old Trafford questionable. I'll concede that Schlupp deserved his place after he has been showing some improvement lately but he was back to his woeful worst today make no mistake. That balloon shot into row zz when Kramaric was free in the middle, appalling. I'm not criticising nige as such just wondering how anyone can say he got "everything else right" when so much went wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bamba's Babes Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Yeah, great, so what actually happened with the fight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goddard Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Are we fans or customers? If we are fans then why not support the side even when they're doing poorly? If we're customers, why carry on supporting them at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Also you will be called a "Troll" for expressing your beliefs.. by the same dim witted people. They are a sad bunch of oinks. Someone who makes up conversations with Harry Redknapp calls others a sad bunch of oinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sylofox Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 What the fvck have 90% of posts got to do with the topic. Can anyone shed any light on the fighting? Without talking about team selection and substitutions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSi13 Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 What the fvck have 90% of posts got to do with the topic. Can anyone shed any light on the fighting? Without talking about team selection and substitutions. Agreed, tell me about the fighting. THE FIGHTING!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sylofox Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 Agreed, tell me about the fighting. THE FIGHTING!!!!!!! Agreed if they want to talk tac tic's fvck off to the post match thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank to be Posted 31 January 2015 Share Posted 31 January 2015 hope everyones ok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.