Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot

How do you best utilise Cambiasso in the next 3 fixtures?

Recommended Posts

Posted

He can't possibly start and finish 3 games in a week, surely? Not if he's going to remain as effective as he has been in recent weeks.

 

Considering he seems to be able to cope with 90 minutes a week reasonably well the obvious call would be start against Burnley and Newcastle, rest against Chelsea. Is that the best way to use him, can he start all 3, have an impact but come off after an hour when he's helped the team? Maybe bring him off the bench in 2 of the 3 and start him in 1? It'll be interesting to see how he's used in this mini run.

 

And if you do rest him and we go with a 2, what's the best alternative? King and James, James and Drinky, Drinky and King? Do we bring Hammond in?

 

Interested what we all think.

Posted

60 minutes v Burnley, if we're doing well take him off, if we still need him keep him on.

 

Should he play 90 at Burnley then rest him against Chelsea, if not then give him another 60, then the full 90 v Newcastle

Posted

He should play as much of the Burnley game as he can, then the staff will assess him. If he is totally match-fit then he should play as much of the Chelsea game as he can, etc etc for the rest of the season. No point guessing how many minutes he can handle they have a whole team and a lot of equipment and science to work that out.

Posted

Put him on the bench for Chelsea and only bring him on if we have a chance of a result.

 

I'd probably play Hammond against chelsea, Mahrez always raises his game for the big clubs and Kramaric has a point to prove so I'd give them both a game as well.

Posted

Put him on the bench for Chelsea and only bring him on if we have a chance of a result.

 

I'd probably play Hammond against chelsea, Mahrez always raises his game for the big clubs and Kramaric has a point to prove so I'd give them both a game as well.

 

I was thinking maybe play Hammond against Chelsea, but do we want to bring someone in in such a big game who hasn't played for so long? It's a big risk imo.

 

From what I've seen King and Drinkwater don't seem to work very well together. I'd be tempted with James/Drinky against Chelsea.

Posted

Got to play the 90 against Burnley, his experience and calmness if we're hanging on for something at the end is vital.

 

Probably the same against Newcastle.

 

Leave him on the bench against Chelsea. If we are clinging on to something in the last 20 minutes, get him on.

Posted

Play him in them all he won't be training all week I doubt any of them will do much training.

 

It's only 1 extra game FFS.

How did football ever get this far with smaller squads more games a season playing on muddy fields and all the players going out on the piss after a game.

 

Oh and eating fish chips and burgers and 34 was not seen as old.

Posted

I was thinking maybe play Hammond against Chelsea, but do we want to bring someone in in such a big game who hasn't played for so long? It's a big risk imo.

From what I've seen King and Drinkwater don't seem to work very well together. I'd be tempted with James/Drinky against Chelsea.

On current form I think it'd be pretty harsh drop king again though

Posted

Play him in them all he won't be training all week I doubt any of them will do much training.

 

It's only 1 extra game FFS.

How did football ever get this far with smaller squads more games a season playing on muddy fields and all the players going out on the piss after a game.

 

Oh and eating fish chips and burgers and 34 was not seen as old.

 

Because everyone in the game was playing with smaller squads playing on muddy fields and all players were going out on the piss after the game, it was a level playing field.

 

Unfortuantley Newcastles midfield wont consist of bold Argentines well on their way to their 35th birthday playing their third game in 7 days. The younger players I can understand resting them is ridiculous.

Posted

Depends how Saturday goes. Remember, Burnley like to close us down and get in our faces. The game might be fast paced.

Posted

Even if we lose against Burnley I'd still rest him against Chelsea. Make sure he runs that midfield against Newcastle, we never expect to get anything at Chelsea anyway.

Posted

It's bound to be results dependant with Cambiasso. Play well at Burnley and lead the game 2-0 with 30 to go and he could be rested. Play poorly and he'll be needed. The same applies to all the games and the level of performance of the whole team will probably dictate how many minutes Cambiasso gets across the 3 games.

 

If his legs can take, I'd personally hate to see him rested as he's been an essential part of our recent winning run.

Posted

Obviously Burnley is more winnable than Chelsea and it's more important to have Cambiasso play that game and then rest against Chelsea. We need him healthy for the balance of the season.

Posted

I honestly cant see why he wouldn't play the full 90 in all 3 or at least start all 3, he is an athlete and the ball does the running for him, for me I think he would want to play all the games he can. I actually think he could do another season at the top level.

Posted

I honestly cant see why he wouldn't play the full 90 in all 3 or at least start all 3, he is an athlete and the ball does the running for him, for me I think he would want to play all the games he can. I actually think he could do another season at the top level.

 

Don't want him to burn out too early.

Played the full amount (Just about, one 85) in the last nine games.

He played eight games not even full 90s before he was rested over Christmas in the rotation.

 

I think Chelsea's a perfect game to give Cambiasso a rest, although he'll love to play against Mou as he missed the corresponding fixture, and I'm pretty sure Mou DOESN'T want to play against Cambi, Mou rates him highly. 

So I actually suspect 90 vs Burnley / 60 vs Chelsea and so on.

Posted

I honestly cant see why he wouldn't play the full 90 in all 3 or at least start all 3, he is an athlete and the ball does the running for him, for me I think he would want to play all the games he can. I actually think he could do another season at the top level.

 

I've not seen a second of fatigue from him all season. Whether that's because we've managed him so well in terms of time on the pitch or because he's a ****ing tank, I don't know.

 

90 against Burnley is a given - unless we're somehow 3-0 up half way through the second half. I'd start him at Chelsea if he's up to it

Posted

we always seem to give the top teams a go and field a strong sode. i woulndt be surprised to see him rested for burnley, but i think its more likely he will play as much of all the games we have between now and the end of season as he can. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...