Sionnach gorm Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Bollocks! Ranieri is just a good manager that understands his men and understands tactics. Don't buy this article at all. He just showed the big money guys who's the boss and who's the bitch! No secret at all. No hoodwinking. No deceipt! Article below. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/claudio-ranieri-been-success-leicester-7824193
Kitchandro Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 This be the Chelsea 'legends' that have got pretty much every manager the sack. I hope he did treat them like shit
foxes_rule1978 Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Who cares regardless it makes him very clever and a great manager.
Socks Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 jesus fookisn christ whatever next... was that wrote by a jealous Arsenal/Spurs/Chelsea fan ? I've never read so much bollocks in my life
Sir Shep Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 The same paper that says s we've just won 3 nil, could have sworn we scored 4 but hey I guess the London media like to make shit up.
Socks Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 jesus fookisn christ whatever next... was that wrote by a jealous Arsenal/Spurs/Chelsea fan ? I've never read so much bollocks in my life Oh no wait, it was wrote by the fookin cretin Collymore should of known better, what an absolute ars3hole that guy is hasn't got a clue what hes talking about, thick as pigsh!it too
Socks Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Stan Collymore in talking bollocks shocker ive just read it for a 3rd time what is he actually trying to prove ?
Chester Dontlie Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 This is clearly bull... I remember Marcel Desailly said in one interview he had a good relationship with Claudio at Chelsea, he was just more demanding to his star players
chuck'em Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 That article doesn't actually say anything at all.
catfordfox Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Confused as to why you're annoyed by that article? Thought it was pretty insightful, complimentary and interesting - I remember someone saying on here months ago that they'd had a chat with Laurent blanc over the summer about ranieri, and he'd said he's an excellent manager (especially defensively) but struggles man managing 'superstars'. Seems spot on to me. Ranieri's a very smart guy - when you are his interviews in any other language than English that really comes through. It's only in English that he has this 'jolly grandad' persona
filbertway Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Yeah I don't see what is wrong with the article. Im willing to bet some people are annoyed and haven't even read it. It's pretty pointless and just states the obvious but it's not an attack or a dig at Ranieri.
Socks Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Confused as to why you're annoyed by that article? Thought it was pretty insightful, complimentary and interesting - I remember someone saying on here months ago that they'd had a chat with Laurent blanc over the summer about ranieri, and he'd said he's an excellent manager (especially defensively) but struggles man managing 'superstars'. Seems spot on to me. Ranieri's a very smart guy - when you are his interviews in any other language than English that really comes through. It's only in English that he has this 'jolly grandad' persona are you having a laff ? its like hes trying to find and fuel some reason for having a go at Ranieri for whatever reason he thinks in his tiny little mind thinks important ??
Tuna Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Ranieri - Class act and a gentleman. Collymore - Hit Ulrika. End of.
Izzy Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Can't see anything other than complements about us in that piece. Whats the problem with it?
Foxxed Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 I probably wouldn't have given this its own thread if I hated the article that much. Isn't it playing into the article's clickbait?
Captain... Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 It could have been an interesting insight, unfortunately it seems to have been written by someone with an agenda.
The Doctor Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Not that unfair, Claudio is a lot cannier than he seems with the friendly grampa persona; although the idea that we've been targeting the title all season and deflecting it as just being about survival for the first few months is a bit ridiculous.
catfordfox Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 are you having a laff ? its like hes trying to find and fuel some reason for having a go at Ranieri for whatever reason he thinks in his tiny little mind thinks important ?? I genuinely can't see where he's having a go. Piece says he's managed expectations masterfully this season, and suggests that a team of hardworking talented players with no big egos suits ranieri's style of management more than a load of self-satisfied 'big names'. That seems about right to me.
Gerard Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Can't see anything other than complements about us in that piece. Whats the problem with it? That's what I thought, Ranieri is portrayed as intelligent, highly competent, ruthless and driven. It's a great reference letter for a manager.
Hungry Hungry Fox Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 This should be in the 'do they mean us' thread
Will1981 Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 Collymore should stick to dogging and beating up women because he knows fook all about football.
hackneyfox Posted 24 April 2016 Posted 24 April 2016 I just don't see where there's an agenda or him having a dig. This paranoia on here is starting to make it seem more like a Spurs or Arsenal board.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.