Sir Shep Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 It's going to be 442, the players want to play 442, the manager is happy for the players to play 442. Anyone who is predicting or asking for another formation are going to be disappointed. Hopefully Stoke will forget how to play for 90 odd minutes but I'm guessing we will end up punting useless balls over the top for Stoke defensive practice.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 6 hours ago, Monsell1976 said: Might do some Christmas shopping Saturday, is there really any point watching, another piss poor, let's roll over away performance. Because I support city, I might check the score after the game, to see how many we conceded, but we are so predictable, and cannot watch king in the heart of our midfield, and watching us concede sloppy goals, and be lucky if we have a shot target. These players and manager should be embarrassed to collect their wages, when we play away. We were superb away from home last season and this season we have just been as poor as I've ever known us to be away wtf? Please King Ranners stop the rot please for the love of God up the Foxes
lgfualol Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 3-1 loss. Can see that strong dwarf Shaqiri and others having our defence on toast, and the same 11 that will probably be tired by half time. Play anything like yesterday and their defence will have an easy day beating Vardy and Okazaki to headers.
Koke Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 People who think Schmeichel and Drinkwater are some sort of saviours, I just wanna remind you that we got turned over by Liverpool, Chelsea, Hull, United, Watford, West Brom when both or one of them was playing. Even if both start against Stoke we will lose if we play same formation and tactics.
Fox92 Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 4 minutes ago, Koke said: People who think Schmeichel and Drinkwater are some sort of saviours, I just wanna remind you that we got turned over by Liverpool, Chelsea, Hull, United, Watford, West Brom when both or one of them was playing. Even if both start against Stoke we will lose if we play same formation and tactics. I keep seeing "we've got Drinkwater, Mendy, James" to come back as if that's going to turn us around. We're just so poor. Can't see anything past a Stoke win.
CPW22 Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 I think we're all bored on saying the same thing over and over. The system needs to change but I've seen nothing from Claudio which suggests it will. Stoke 3 - 0 Leicester.
norwichfox Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 10 hours ago, Col city fan said: If Claudio decides to go 442 again, with a central midfield pairing of King and Amartey, I'm thinking about sending him a spec savers voucher through the post. Why is he doing this? Maybe because he asked the players what formation they want to play instead of telling them "we will do it like this".......nahhh, I didn't think so either........nor can I think of a logical reason.
Ricey Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 Kasper Simpson - Morgan - Huth - Fuchs Mendy Drinkwater King Mahrez Gray Vardy If at 2pm I find out we are playing 4-4-2 again I'm not watching. I'd sooner not be angry for 2 hours and then have my day ruined.
VLC86 Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 Anyone have any idea of what formation we could play here?
Wilson_6 Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 11 hours ago, Tuna said: Big game for Claudio, if he goes 4-4-2 again we'll lose. Albrighton needs ditching, Hernandez can retire and hopefully we'll have Drinky, Kasper and Schmeichel back. 4-2-3-1 Schmeichel, Simpson, Huth, Morgan, Fuchs, Drinkwater, Mendy, Mahrez, Okazaki, Gray, Vardy. I always defend Albrighton but i think i would like to see Gray start instead of him. Hernandez was a centre back playing at right back last night should have put Amarty there instead.
Wilson_6 Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 13 minutes ago, Ricey said: Kasper Simpson - Morgan - Huth - Fuchs Mendy Drinkwater King Mahrez Gray Vardy If at 2pm I find out we are playing 4-4-2 again I'm not watching. I'd sooner not be angry for 2 hours and then have my day ruined. Think i'm going to do the same thing mate. last night was horrible. feel sorry for my misses haha
RonnieTodger Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 2-0 down after an hour. Consolation goal optional. Repeat process for rest of season.
CosbehFox Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 Interestingly Charlie Adam was on the radio last week saying how much more comfortable Stoke feel playing three in midfield. How it protects the defence and the midfield feel as though they have more time on the ball.
Arriba Los Zorros Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 I imagine a 2-1 loss with about 25% possession against the mighty Stokealona and that will flatter us. Claudio to say he sees signs of improvement that nobody else can see. **** the result, if we put in yet another listless performance I'd like to see Claudio out or at the very least a serious warning from the owners.
Realist Guy In The Room Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 We're going to get ripped to shreds against Stoke and afterwards, there'll be the same old excuses. 'What did you expect?' 'You obviously weren't around in the League 1 days' 'If you'd have been offered what's happening this season in payment for what happened last you'd take it' 'Last 16 of the Champions League' Blah blah blah. Our away form will see us relegated and its down to poor signings, tactics and the players thinking they're billy big boots and not putting a shift in.
OllieLodge96 Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 It just can't be 4-4-2, it is blatantly obvious that this formation has now worked away from home. Claudio needs to change something. This will not be the team, but if it was up to me, I would play something like this 4-5-1 Schmeichel (if fit) Simpson Morgan Huth Fuchs (Our best player) Mahrez Amartey Drinkwater (if fit - King if not) Mendy Gray Vardy Subs: Zieler, Chilwell, King/James, Kapustka, Albrighton, Slimani, Okazaki
blueharmie Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 Can't be in the bottom three at the start of this match I don't think. That's a positive. Might be down there at the end mind... 3-1 Stoke.
st albans fox Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 2 hours ago, Cardiff_Fox said: Interestingly Charlie Adam was on the radio last week saying how much more comfortable Stoke feel playing three in midfield. How it protects the defence and the midfield feel as though they have more time on the ball. Amazing - who would have thought ..........
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 1 hour ago, Callabinho said: 3-0 Stoke. They will piss all over us. No chance more like 4-0.
Raw Dykes Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 I just want to see a good performance. It would be great to see Claudio try something new, but if not, the least I expect is a more energetic, creative display with more pressing. If it's yet another lacklustre 442 showing, I think my patience with CR might have completely run out.
Argarath Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 Get mendy and drinkwater in. Amartey and king out. And Musa can stay at home and watch the game on tv..
ZeGuy Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 Why not Amartey before the back four and Mendy + Drinky a bit more forward? The more I see Amartey and the more I'm convinced that this position would suit him good. Would love to see him as CB though.
Matt Posted 14 December 2016 Posted 14 December 2016 16 hours ago, jayfox26 said: Guarantee if we are 2-0 down at half time this time, we will not draw 2-2. Probably lose 4-0 Oh without a doubt. If we concede first we will not comeback it as simple, cut and dry as that. I knew last night we'd lost as soon as they scored, we wouldn't come back. What I mean about good away is local, seemed quite a decent, easy accessible pub and the shuttle buses are a fantastic idea. **** the game, gotta take positives from elsewhere atm.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.