HighPeakFox Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 It's good news, because it gives all the miseries more stuff to angrily complain about.
onekeithweller Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 Infantino "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss".
weller54 Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 6 minutes ago, onekeithweller said: Infantino "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss". The Who...
onekeithweller Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 2 minutes ago, weller54 said: The Who... Won't Get Fooled Again. Yeah, not much.
The Doctor Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 So, wait, fifa have to consent to be taken to court what a complete joke. Don't know why people want to blame the club when fifa are being the arses here though...
Monsell1976 Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 46 minutes ago, davieG said: Didn't matter how fast we did things it was never going to get past FIFA Could have gone to arbitration quicker, as it was clear fifa wanted to make an example of us, by rejecting it because of a 14 second delay, but now we can’t be fast tracked, so it’s down to wait till jan, or silva goes to arbitration, could we have not foreseen this, with the highly paid advisors, and not back silva to go on his own, straight after fifa declined the appeal, or even in the summer. Just a shambles from fifa and the club, and it’s silva who is paying the price
The Doctor Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 2 minutes ago, Monsell1976 said: Could have gone to arbitration quicker, as it was clear fifa wanted to make an example of us, by rejecting it because of a 14 second delay, but now we can’t be fast tracked, so it’s down to wait till jan, or silva goes to arbitration, could we have not foreseen this, with the highly paid advisors, and not back silva to go on his own, straight after fifa declined the appeal, or even in the summer. Just a shambles from fifa and the club, and it’s silva who is paying the price If fifa want to make an example of us we couldn't fast track whenever we took it to CAS - that's the point of the statement; that fifa are refusing to be taken to court in a timely manner.
Wymsey Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 At least, in January, the team will have a more competent midfielder; and allows the likes of Ndidi in particular to be more midfield-offensive.
Fox 4 Life Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 6 minutes ago, Wymeswold fox said: At least, in January, the team will have a more competent midfielder; and allows the likes of Ndidi in particular to be more midfield-offensive. Wouldn't Ndidi sit and allow Silva to be the more offensive player?
st albans fox Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 48 minutes ago, The Doctor said: So, wait, fifa have to consent to be taken to court what a complete joke. Don't know why people want to blame the club when fifa are being the arses here though... Nope - but they have to agree to fast track the case. Why would they?? Pointless and I posted this on the day of the rejection when this was first mooted by the club.
Wymsey Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 13 minutes ago, Fox 4 Life said: Wouldn't Ndidi sit and allow Silva to be the more offensive player? Thought Silva was a central, holding midfielder, whilst Ndidi is normally positioned just in front the the cm's?
Mike Oxlong Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 7 minutes ago, st albans fox said: Nope - they have to agree to fast track the case. Why would they?? Pointless and I posted this on the day of the rejection when this was first mooted by the club. Because they have faith in the fairness of their own decision making and have nothing to fear from external scrutiny ? Sorry, that was silly - it's FIFA.
notnow john Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 19 minutes ago, st albans fox said: Nope - but they have to agree to fast track the case. Why would they?? Pointless and I posted this on the day of the rejection when this was first mooted by the club. I remember you saying that but I can't understand why we wouldn't persue the case. Ok Fifa can stall the hearing until after January but being able to prove them wrong is important,surely. It just seems we don't have a lot of belief in our case.
st albans fox Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 4 minutes ago, notnow john said: I remember you saying that but I can't understand why we wouldn't persue the case. Ok Fifa can stall the hearing until after January but being able to prove them wrong is important,surely. It just seems we don't have a lot of belief in our case. If there is no legal basis for obtaining recompense over costs then we are simply spending even more money on a point of principe. I can only assume we have been advised that even a positive retrospective outcome will not entitle us to sue for damages. If we thought it was completely fruitless then we wouldn’t highlight the players’ ability to make his own challenge
Dr The Singh Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 So city prefer not to do anything....sounds like the rumours are true, we foOKed up and have no case
notnow john Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 6 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said: So city prefer not to do anything....sounds like the rumours are true, we foOKed up and have no case Wish I'd said that!
Countryfox Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 Would have been quicker to have done some plastic surgery on his fizzog and make him look like Andy King ...
mozartfox Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 1 hour ago, Dr The Singh said: So city prefer not to do anything....sounds like the rumours are true, we foOKed up and have no case Yep and on Rudder's watch........................ Q- Brush/Carpet
bald reynard Posted 24 October 2017 Posted 24 October 2017 Sky Sports News reporting that there is a chance for Silva to make a Personal Appeal to the CAS, on the grounds that he is, "unreasonably being prevented from competing in his sport". Apparently, there are very few precedents for such a case, but it might be worth pursuing, as there would be no grounds for FIFA to object to an expedited (early) Personal hearing, as they did with City's case.
weller54 Posted 28 October 2017 Posted 28 October 2017 5 minutes ago, Micky said: There he is! Can't see him sitting in the stands?
Dr The Singh Posted 28 October 2017 Posted 28 October 2017 On 24/10/2017 at 14:41, Countryfox said: Would have been quicker to have done some plastic surgery on his fizzog and make him look like Andy King ... I've got some play dog, let's.do it
weller54 Posted 28 October 2017 Posted 28 October 2017 4 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said: I've got some play dog, let's.do it Woof woof!!
fuchsntf Posted 28 October 2017 Posted 28 October 2017 On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 15:41, Countryfox said: Would have been quicker to have done some plastic surgery on his fizzog and make him look like Andy King ... Plastic mould Would take until January... They have to perfect the Various Kingy Gurning material...
st albans fox Posted 28 October 2017 Posted 28 October 2017 That's an interesting photo - assuming that the owners have been in Thailand this week, that photo was probably taken yesterday afternoon - the delay to the squad photo until the end of October would say that shakey had been walking a tightrope for some time ....... unless there was a previous squad photo which I haven't seen ........
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.