surrifox Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 11 minutes ago, Livid said: Anyone posted the link to the Oatcake thread. http://oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/281382/stoke-reject-leicester-diouf-holding It's when they point out they are asking for more than they got for Shaquiri Please no more - this is ruining my holiday
Guest Mickyblueeyes Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 15 minutes ago, weller54 said: Good point, well made sir.
Tielemans63 Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 (edited) 10 minutes ago, FoxyPalace.com said: He would score more than Ulloa & Slimani. If they both left the club before the season started, maybe. Even then.... Edited 6 August 2018 by Paddy.
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 17 minutes ago, Livid said: Anyone posted the link to the Oatcake thread. http://oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/281382/stoke-reject-leicester-diouf-holding It's when they point out they are asking for more than they got for Shaquiri Reading that, their version of Sean from Enderby has suggested this; “Fee agreed, just debating how the payments are made, Stoke wants more upront.. fee around 10 mil. Will be going now and will hopefully be done before Thursday.. medical possibly tomorrow afternoon at the earliest.” Read more: http://oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/281382/stoke-reject-leicester-diouf-holding?page=5#ixzz5NQJy1Gq5
Guest MattP Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 6 minutes ago, FoxyPalace.com said: He would score more than Ulloa & Slimani. Only if both are ruled out for the season.
weller54 Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 Cue the end of Eastenders music.... Diouf Diouf Diouf Diouf Diouf!.....
North Leeds Fox Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 I'm sure signing diouf will convince Harry to stay...
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 3 minutes ago, foxfanazer said: This can’t be seriously happening It probably is. For a start, why would any paper make up this rummor? What possible reason would there be for doing that? It’s not like splashing this ‘exclusive’ would result in mass paper sales or internet traffic.
Brainy Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 I've never seen such an overreaction to a bid that has probably never happened, and if so has thankfully been rejected 1
Dahnsouff Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 Just now, DJ Barry Hammond said: It probably is. For a start, why would any paper make up this rummor? What possible reason would there be for doing that? It’s not like splashing this ‘exclusive’ would result in mass paper sales or internet traffic. Irony klaxon alert
Md9 Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 This would be s very undewhelming signing at best. Would rather give one of the youth lads a few games sure it couldn’t be any worse.
rachhere Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 Made the mistake of looking on Twitter and saw a Stoke fan suggesting they offer us a counter proposal where Stoke give us Diouf and in return we give them money plus Amartey... I think I need to logout
ToeKneeHandCock Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 At least if this does happen both Leo and Slimani must be off 1
FoxinNotts Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 Just now, ToeKneeHandCock said: At least if this does happen both Leo and Slimani must be off Both training today with the first team sqaud
foxfanazer Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 2 minutes ago, ToeKneeHandCock said: At least if this does happen both Leo and Slimani must be off I’d keep both over signing Diouf and I don’t even like Slimani
Robin JD Popley Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 What worries me is I know we genuinely tried to get him in on deadline day a couple of seasons ago and reading he is a "long term target" doesn't fill me with confidence. A couple of years ago, he may have been worth a punt, but I do think it's throwing more money at someone for the sake of it. When you think Fulham managed to get Schurrle on loan, that's what we should be aspiring toward. Someone with some actual pedigree.
Koke Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 Thursday can't come quick enough. I would rather we signed nobody at all than than sign this donkey. 1
mozartfox Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 This Car Crash would make us laughing stocks. Rudders, Puel, Top, Vichai and Scouting Team - We are all so very sorry for any nasty posts we have made. Please, I beg of you - do not do this too us - please..............and FT will be nice to you all forever.
psychonaut Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 What an utter fvcking shambles - are the owners throwing the towel in or what?! The fvckin devil’s come to collect hasnt he. I knew the time would come I always had my suspicions after the supernatural season we had. Those fat basterd monks laughing into their green tea I bet. 1
Tielemans63 Posted 6 August 2018 Posted 6 August 2018 This would be such a regressive move. The sort of signing that might have made some sense when we were first promoted under Pearson but is literally inexplicable now. Sounds out all the wrong messages about the club's ambitions.
Recommended Posts