Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Mickyblueeyes
Posted
15 minutes ago, weller54 said:

 

West+Ham+v+Leicester+City+npower+Championship+-t5fcgm7XHam.jpg

Good point, well made sir.

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, FoxyPalace.com said:

He would score more than Ulloa & Slimani.

 

If they both left the club before the season started, maybe. Even then....

Edited by Paddy.
Posted
17 minutes ago, Livid said:

Anyone posted the link to the Oatcake thread.

 

http://oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/281382/stoke-reject-leicester-diouf-holding

 

 

It's when they point out they are asking for more than they got for Shaquiri :blink:

 

Reading that, their version of Sean from Enderby has suggested this;

 

“Fee agreed, just debating how the payments are made, Stoke wants more upront.. fee around 10 mil.

Will be going now and will hopefully be done before Thursday.. medical possibly tomorrow afternoon at the earliest.”

Read more:  http://oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/281382/stoke-reject-leicester-diouf-holding?page=5#ixzz5NQJy1Gq5

Guest MattP
Posted
6 minutes ago, FoxyPalace.com said:

He would score more than Ulloa & Slimani.

Only if both are ruled out for the season. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, foxfanazer said:

This can’t be seriously happening 

 

It probably is.

 

For a start, why would any paper make up this rummor? What possible reason would there be for doing that?

 

It’s not like splashing this ‘exclusive’ would result in mass paper sales or internet traffic. 

Posted
Just now, DJ Barry Hammond said:

 

It probably is.

 

For a start, why would any paper make up this rummor? What possible reason would there be for doing that?

 

It’s not like splashing this ‘exclusive’ would result in mass paper sales or internet traffic. 

Irony klaxon alert

Posted

This would be s very undewhelming signing at best. Would rather give one of the youth lads a few games sure it couldn’t be any worse.

Posted

Made the mistake of looking on Twitter and saw a Stoke fan suggesting they offer us a counter proposal where Stoke give us Diouf and in return we give them money plus Amartey... I think I need to logout  

Posted
2 minutes ago, ToeKneeHandCock said:

At least if this does happen both Leo and Slimani must be off

I’d keep both over signing Diouf and I don’t even like Slimani

Posted

What worries me is I know we genuinely tried to get him in on deadline day a couple of seasons ago and reading he is a "long term target" doesn't fill me with confidence. A couple of years ago, he may have been worth a punt, but I do think it's throwing more money at someone for the sake of it. 

 

When you think Fulham managed to get Schurrle on loan, that's what we should be aspiring toward. Someone with some actual pedigree.

Posted

Thursday can't come quick enough.

 

I would rather we signed nobody at all than than sign this donkey.

  • Haha 1
Posted

This Car Crash would make us laughing stocks.  Rudders, Puel, Top, Vichai and Scouting Team -  We are all so very sorry for any nasty posts we have made.  Please, I beg of you - do not do this too us - please..............and FT will be nice to you all forever.

Posted

What an utter fvcking shambles - are the owners throwing the towel in or what?! The fvckin devil’s come to collect hasnt he. I knew the time would come I always had my suspicions after the supernatural season we had. Those fat basterd monks laughing into their green tea I bet.

  • Haha 1
Posted

This would be such a regressive move. The sort of signing that might have made some sense when we were first promoted under Pearson but is literally inexplicable now. Sounds out all the wrong messages about the club's ambitions.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...