sylofox Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 On 12/01/2019 at 19:39, TrentFox said: NFP would never have stood for that crap. He’d have pulled a knife on her. Feckin’ OAPs. She has previous Pearson told her to FOAD.
urban.spaceman Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 On 12/01/2019 at 19:59, RoboFox said: Fake news, folks. I've seen the original images. I’d bloody love a pair of FoxesTalk socks.
MC Prussian Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 On 12/01/2019 at 20:26, Itsthejoeker said: Say what you want in a public place, freedom of speech doesn’t apply on private property. That is a highly-discussed topic in law circles and I would argue that freedom of speech should apply to private property also or that companies/football clubs at least show a bit more common sense and tact when dealing with fans'/customers' opinions. In any case, it makes for cringeworthy watching seeing a steward taking a small piece of paper away from an older woman. In the extreme case, you'd have to ask yourself - what next? Are we going to get censorship or bans for critical chants or outraged fans who call the manager an "absolute twat" or "a disgrace" during a match? I do hope the steward here acted on his own behalf and not because he was in any way, shape or form instructed to do so by the club.
ealingfox Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 9 minutes ago, MC Prussian said: That is a highly-discussed topic in law circles and I would argue that freedom of speech should apply to private property also or that companies/football clubs at least show a bit more common sense and tact when dealing with fans'/customers' opinions. In any case, it makes for cringeworthy watching seeing a steward taking a small piece of paper away from a pensioner. In the extreme case, you'd have to ask yourself - what next? Are we going to get censorship or bans for critical chants or outraged fans who call the manager an "absolute twat" or "a disgrace" during a match? I do hope the steward here acted on his own behalf and not because he was in any way, shape or form instructed to do so by the club. I don't think that woman would thank you for describing her as a pensioner!
MC Prussian Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 Just now, ealingfox said: I don't think that woman would thank you for describing her as a pensioner! Certainly looks like it in the first picture. Superficial me!
Ted Maul Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 On 12/01/2019 at 19:05, broughtonblue said: When was free speech banned? The absolute state of it No surprise that her son is trying to avoid being recognised with her. Hat, shades, programme in front of the face- textbook.
KingsX Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 21 hours ago, Stadt said: Weird that our rival’s fan base seems more clued up and reasonable than our own You are a brave, nay reckless man to say that on here. How are the BASE jumping and bull riding going? FIF’s post was on the Forest Forum right after he made it. And their thread has now devolved into a page and a half of arguing about their “top 25 dislikes received” list. Not to mention certain usernames. So we can move forward safe in the knowledge that (a) they are still obsessed with us, and (b) they remain mutant, yet oddly primitive freaks despite the occasional odd flash of clarity.
The Horse's Mouth Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 nice to know we're now run by the national front
Bunyip Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 5 hours ago, MC Prussian said: That is a highly-discussed topic in law circles and I would argue that freedom of speech should apply to private property also or that companies/football clubs at least show a bit more common sense and tact when dealing with fans'/customers' opinions. In any case, it makes for cringeworthy watching seeing a steward taking a small piece of paper away from an older woman. In the extreme case, you'd have to ask yourself - what next? Are we going to get censorship or bans for critical chants or outraged fans who call the manager an "absolute twat" or "a disgrace" during a match? I do hope the steward here acted on his own behalf and not because he was in any way, shape or form instructed to do so by the club. It's a fair bet the macho steward would not have dreamt of going into SK1 and taking it off of a 6ft plus stone island wearing bearded nutcase.
Bunyip Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 4 hours ago, Ted Maul said: The absolute state of it No surprise that her son is trying to avoid being recognised with her. Hat, shades, programme in front of the face- textbook. Yes that's right verbally attack an old woman if it makes you feel big. ( want a job as a steward? )
Ted Maul Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 22 minutes ago, Bunyip said: Yes that's right verbally attack an old woman if it makes you feel big. ( want a job as a steward? ) I'll 'verbally attack' (have a pop) at anyone who makes our fanbase look so ridiculous
Bunyip Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 1 hour ago, Ted Maul said: I'll 'verbally attack' (have a pop) at anyone who makes our fanbase look so ridiculous Very brave. the irony of you accusing others of looking ridiculous.
KingsX Posted 14 January 2019 Posted 14 January 2019 If you want the world outside FT to take the #puelout movement seriously, you've come up with the wrong faces for it. Four out of five look like the oxygen tubes just fell out of their noses #PRdisaster
foxinsocks Posted 15 January 2019 Posted 15 January 2019 I am sparticus. We all need to bring a4 "banners" with puel out on. Could someone make a replica of the lady's art work that we can all print? Even those who are not puel out...add small print saying that: i might not agree with you views but i support your right to say them
FoxFossil Posted 15 January 2019 Posted 15 January 2019 5 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: I am sparticus. We all need to bring a4 "banners" with puel out on. Could someone make a replica of the lady's art work that we can all print? Even those who are not puel out...add small print saying that: i might not agree with you views but i support your right to say them Plus Yellow Jackets, just to confuse the Stewards.
Grebfromgrebland Posted 15 January 2019 Posted 15 January 2019 Chill out everyone the steward has been told he shouldn't have taken the sign off the old dear!
AlloverthefloorYesNdidi Posted 15 January 2019 Posted 15 January 2019 9 hours ago, KingsX said: If you want the world outside FT to take the #puelout movement seriously, you've come up with the wrong faces for it. Four out of five look like the oxygen tubes just fell out of their noses #PRdisaster @foxinsocks honestly didnt realise you were a woman
mallen Posted 15 January 2019 Posted 15 January 2019 On 12/01/2019 at 19:30, dooflip said: So we all need to make a4 banners for the United game then? absolutely
foxinsocks Posted 15 January 2019 Posted 15 January 2019 13 hours ago, Grebfromgrebland said: Chill out everyone the steward has been told he shouldn't have taken the sign off the old dear! How do you know that?
Grebfromgrebland Posted 15 January 2019 Posted 15 January 2019 I heard on radio Leicester 30 minutes ago, foxinsocks said: How do you know that?
Brainy Posted 15 January 2019 Posted 15 January 2019 On 12/01/2019 at 19:05, broughtonblue said: When was free speech banned? The pictures in reverse order tell a better story for anybody still enraged about this
ozleicester Posted 16 January 2019 Posted 16 January 2019 1 hour ago, Walkers said: The pictures in reverse order tell a better story for anybody still enraged about this everyone will get one of these instead of clappers next game
Mark 'expert' Lawrenson Posted 16 January 2019 Posted 16 January 2019 Stewards are generally social misfits, giving them a high vis jacket provides them with a little power and a purpose for a few hours in their lives.
Bunyip Posted 16 January 2019 Posted 16 January 2019 On 14/01/2019 at 23:10, KingsX said: If you want the world outside FT to take the #puelout movement seriously, you've come up with the wrong faces for it. Four out of five look like the oxygen tubes just fell out of their noses #PRdisaster About as funny as you shitting your nappy.
UniFox21 Posted 16 January 2019 Posted 16 January 2019 10 minutes ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said: Stewards are generally social misfits, giving them a high vis jacket provides them with a little power and a purpose for a few hours in their lives. What a great thing to read in the morning... But that's out of order, they're there to make sure we get to watch the game safely and help with issues you have. It's their job, have a little respect.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.