Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
koop.

MOTD

By koop., in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
VLC86

VLC86

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 minute ago, Mike the Metal Ed said:

Why do Spurs fans "know best" and when we protest or aren't wearing beaming smiles all the time we're "entitled"?

Because It’s a different persons view

  • Like 8
  • Popular Post
Spudulike

Spudulike

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

So, apparently a full Spurs side would've beaten Leicester City, they Said. No mention about our injuries of which 4 would've been starters today.

  • Like 19
StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

So, apparently a full Spurs side would've beaten Leicester City, they Said. No mention about our injuries of which 4 would've been starters today.

They probably would have. 

 

Even Maddison or Johnson playing and it's a different outcome. They clearly missed a lot of quality in the final third and midfield. Solanke missing is a big difference compared to a half-fit Richarlison. 

 

Their defence is a shambles though, even if Romero or Udogie was playing.

They had absolutely no help from the midfield. Look how much space BEK had for his goal lol

 

  • Popular Post
VLC86

VLC86

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
24 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

So, apparently a full Spurs side would've beaten Leicester City, they Said. No mention about our injuries of which 4 would've been starters today.

A full Spurs side would more often than not beat a full Leicester side though wouldn’t it.

 

Why do people get so pissy about what pundits say? We are where we are.

  • Like 12
Spudulike

Spudulike

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, StanSP said:

They probably would have. 

 

Even Maddison or Johnson playing and it's a different outcome. They clearly missed a lot of quality in the final third and midfield. Solanke missing is a big difference compared to a half-fit Richarlison. 

 

Their defence is a shambles though, even if Romero or Udogie was playing.

They had absolutely no help from the midfield. Look how much space BEK had for his goal lol

 

 

2 minutes ago, VLC86 said:

A full Spurs side would more often than not beat a full Leicester side though wouldn’t it.

 

Why do people get so pissy about what pundits say? We are where we are.

Of course, they may well have done. That's not my point. For the interest of balance it needed to be stated that both teams were missing very important players. They could have said that Leicester would've have won more convincingly if they had a fit squad.

  • Like 3
Gamble92

Gamble92

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, StanSP said:

They probably would have. 

 

Even Maddison or Johnson playing and it's a different outcome. They clearly missed a lot of quality in the final third and midfield. Solanke missing is a big difference compared to a half-fit Richarlison. 

 

Their defence is a shambles though, even if Romero or Udogie was playing.

They had absolutely no help from the midfield. Look how much space BEK had for his goal lol

 

The way Spurs and West Ham played against us this season has been absolutely suicidal on their part. We actually look a good side when the opposing midfield gives absolutely no support to the defence. It was unbelievably easy to play between the lines against both teams. 

CrazyKopCorner

CrazyKopCorner

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, VLC86 said:

A full Spurs side would more often than not beat a full Leicester side though wouldn’t it.

 

Why do people get so pissy about what pundits say? We are where we are.

I think it's because they are so ill informed and base opinions on nonsense 

davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Mike the Metal Ed said:

Why do Spurs fans "know best" and when we protest or aren't wearing beaming smiles all the time we're "entitled"?

Because Spurs are a 'big 6' club and are expected to win trophies we're just parochial upstarts who don't know their place.

Clever Fox

Clever Fox

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, davieG said:

Because Spurs are a 'big 6' club and are expected to win trophies we're just parochial upstarts who don't know their place.

They are just a bunch of posers who never win anything and they call us entitled.

OntarioFox

OntarioFox

Posted
Posted

This is about the depth of the analysis we've had from Match Of The Day this season

 

 

 

TheStig

TheStig

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, davieG said:

Because Spurs are a 'big 6' club and are expected to win trophies we're just parochial upstarts who don't know their place.

Wash your mouth - Spurs and trophies in the same sentence is blasphemy....

CosbehFox

CosbehFox

Posted
Posted (edited)

I thought the analysis last night was really measured and fair play for them making the point to concentrate on us first. Hitzlsperger in particular was a welcome change 

Edited by CosbehFox
  • Like 1
RYM

RYM

Posted
Posted

Lovely to see Levy under pressure. The guy is sucking in so many in our game (including our very own Anthony who talks to him) to follow his model of “maximising the matchday revenue ceiling”.

 

Great to see our gilet wearing Dutchman smiling. Up the City 🦊

  • Like 1
Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, TheStig said:

Wash your mouth - Spurs and trophies in the same sentence is blasphemy....

As Jamie Vardy pointed out you have 1 thing they don’t .

 

What must be even worse is Spurs hardly seem get to finals   - hard to remember they got to the Champions league one on 2019.

 

Ok now I have said that they will probably win the league cup..

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted

Pundits talk shit. We can only play the team the opposition puts out.

 

I don't see the point of all this if your aunt had bollox she would be your uncle shit.

Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, winteriscoming said:

Bournemouth apparently had 9 players out but still thrashed Forest. No mention about their injury crisis. 

They did show a load of injured players watching the game on Saturdays show .

  • Like 2
Foxdiamond

Foxdiamond

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Super_horns said:

As Jamie Vardy pointed out you have 1 thing they don’t .

 

What must be even worse is Spurs hardly seem get to finals   - hard to remember they got to the Champions league one on 2019.

 

Ok now I have said that they will probably win the league cup..

 

 

 

 

I can see the irony. Spurs terrible in League but win a cup or two. Obviously hope not 

  • Like 1
Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted

Highlights are so bad these days, basically shows the goals and a few chances, none of the time wasting and midfield play.  Barely a few mins long.  So much is missed by not watching the full game.

  • Like 3
HoustonFox

HoustonFox

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Nope, called it wrong.

 

Fair play to the MotD team.

NBC were all about Spurs and we didn’t get a mention. You’d think based on the coverage here that Spurs lost a fight with themselves in phone box 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...