North Leeds Fox Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 Surely if it's just utd interested, the fee is 85 plus Greenwood (to annoy their fans) plus dropping their interest in youri. In all honesty, now that man City do not appear interested at our asking price, he will probably stay here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UniFox21 Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 3 hours ago, Bazly said: I recall watching a Leicester City versus Manchester United game on Sky Sports where the hour build up before the game was 45 minutes on Manchester players, tactics and replays of loads of fine goals from across time. Then the next 15 minutes on Leicester City centred around did you know Kaspers dad used to play for Manchester United. I cancelled Sky as soon as the contract period was up and never regretted it. That's what a Kodi box does for you. Start of the season. You'd think after a summer we'd get equal on both, with stuff on transfers etc. But no. It was 45mins of consistent Man Utd love train, before we even got a mention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxes1 Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 So Man Ure are now interested in Issa Diop does that mean no more interest in Maguire. See they have offered 45 mill plus a player (probably Jones) for Diop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 10 minutes ago, Foxes1 said: So Man Ure are now interested in Issa Diop does that mean no more interest in Maguire. See they have offered 45 mill plus a player (probably Jones) for Diop Doubt it. They need a new fuching team that is actually a team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban.spaceman Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 51 minutes ago, Foxes1 said: So Man Ure are now interested in Issa Diop does that mean no more interest in Maguire. See they have offered 45 mill plus a player (probably Jones) for Diop He’s a nightmare for Diopposition apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxes1 Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 9 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: He’s a nightmare for Diopposition apparently. You have been looking at twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 Not sure of the going rate for an advert on sky but if nobody is watching sky sports news or whatever companies will not be paying much or queuing up to advertise with them. Cannot think they we be going with the line of "well fvck all will be happening for the next week or so as players are on holiday" so they have to come up with something think you would be doing well for 5% of the links to actually come true via Sky but when did truth ever come in the way of a good story. Whatever happens we as fans have no say in it anyway. If a player wants to go he will, the club though has made sure the players they value are on long term contracts so they go on our terms. Hate to upset some on here but they club and management set up is not as bad as they want it to be and there is a lot worse out there than Whelan, Rudkin and co. The general media might have bought into the 5000-1 outsiders Premier league story but have failed to grasp the Club and owners have different ideas than to just fade away. The club has a pretty good infrastructure to rival any club in the PL and our business model seems a lot stronger than most. The fact that the media are linking our players with "bigger clubs" should be seen as a positive 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronnup Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 We're not a club that can resist a 90 million bid for anyone. Let's be realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 10 minutes ago, ronnup said: We're not a club that can resist a 90 million bid for anyone. Let's be realistic. Spot on but Sky saying XYZ has bid £90 million for any of our players and an actual bid of £90 million are very different 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trav Le Bleu Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 38 minutes ago, katieakita said: Spot on but Sky saying XYZ has bid £90 million for any of our players and an actual bid of £90 million are very different What people patently fail to realise is that Sky is a commercial TV station and that there are many times more Man Utd "fans" than City fans (by which of course I mean Leicester - anyone thinking otherwise... shame on you), so Sky will publish stuff to tickle the ears of Man Utd fans, regardless of factual evidence and with scant regard for us, who make up a much smaller fraction of their custom. Sad, but true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 Amusingly , Sean Custis did a talkSPORT transfer show at 6pm today and the twitter votes were a) maguire to ..... Man City/yanited/stay at lcfc b) maxi Lopez ...... Valencia or west ham now the Harry vote winner was to stay at Lcfc ...... the presenter’s comment was ‘hijacked by the Leicester fans’ the lopez vote winner was Valencia and funnily enough not a mention that this vote was hijacked !!!!!! and no sign that custis could see the inconsistency of his approach ........ 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue ROI Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 If we are to sell then Maguire is the one I would be okay with going if push comes to shove. We were somewhat prepared for it last season and that was with 3 new players. Now that Evans is a success and Benkovic though injured has shown up well at Celtic it's a more acceptable scenario than losing Chilwell, Maddison or Tielemans. If Harry stays fair play but it wouldn't be like the loss of Kante just before 2016/17. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 I’m prepared for this but no one knows how big an impact his departure will have on the way we play ...BR wants us to be brave playing out through the press from the back and harry’s calm approach in possession is crucial to this ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 The mirror are running a story that Kuhn vichai promised Harry he could leave this summer if our valuation is met and we intend to honour that commitment ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UniFox21 Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 7 minutes ago, st albans fox said: The mirror are running a story that Kuhn vichai promised Harry he could leave this summer if our valuation is met and we intend to honour that commitment ..... Getting bored if this now, every year its "We've said this, why aren't we letting them leave" It's bs and lazy bloody journalism. If the value is met of 80/90million then he will be able to leave. United won't sell Pogba for a lot less than their valuation so why should we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HankMarvin Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 (edited) Set to leave according to this “exclusive” https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/harry-maguire-set-transfer-leicester-16524968 Edited 15 June 2019 by HankMarvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxfanazer Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 See ya then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volpeazzurro Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 (edited) 29 minutes ago, st albans fox said: The mirror are running a story that Kuhn vichai promised Harry he could leave this summer if our valuation is met and we intend to honour that commitment ..... I saw that and whilst at this time of year you can take much of the transfer reporting with a large pinch of salt, but for me this is something quite different. If they are in the know that's one thing and we'll have to wait and see. But ... if it's lazy speculative journalism then it had hit a new low. It would be disgraceful to take our former chairman's name in vane just to get a few clicks on a website or sell a few papers. For me it crosses the boundaries of decency and some authority ought to check the authenticity of the writers information. Edited 15 June 2019 by volpeazzurro 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post splinterdream Posted 15 June 2019 Popular Post Share Posted 15 June 2019 Irrelevant of what's been said this is totally disrespectful, if Vichai did say this it was an honourable thing to say but private, if we indeed have agreed to honour it then this may cause harm to the transfer fee we're trying to get, if any Leicester fan buys the Mirror I suggest they stop after this disgusting article 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UniFox21 Posted 15 June 2019 Share Posted 15 June 2019 17 minutes ago, volpeazzurro said: I saw that and whilst at this time of year you can take much of the transfer reporting with a large pinch of salt, but for me this is something quite different. If they are in the know that's one thing and we'll have to wait and see. But ... if it's lazy speculative journalism then it had hit a new low. It would be disgraceful to take our former chairman's name in vane just to get a few clicks on a website or sell a few papers. For me it crosses the boundaries of decency and some authority ought to check the authenticity of the writers information. 8 minutes ago, splinterdream said: Irrelevant of what's been said this is totally disrespectful, if Vichai did say this it was an honourable thing to say but private, if we indeed have agreed to honour it then this may cause harm to the transfer fee we're trying to get, if any Leicester fan buys the Mirror I suggest they stop after this disgusting article There's just no need for them to write this. If they'd simply said something along the lines of the board having an agreement, that's different. But to name Vichai and start to speculate private conversations, it's a low point, and it isn't needed. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HankMarvin Posted 16 June 2019 Share Posted 16 June 2019 https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9303698/man-utd-ed-woodward-80m-harry-maguire-leicester-england-transfer/ 350k a week ? “The Red Devils could throw Eric Bailly and Marcos Rojo into the deal if Foxes boss Brendan Rodgers is prepared to accept a part-exchange.” just take the money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mickyblueeyes Posted 16 June 2019 Popular Post Share Posted 16 June 2019 2 hours ago, HankMarvin said: Set to leave according to this “exclusive” https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/harry-maguire-set-transfer-leicester-16524968 Aim at the Mirror not you. This is not an exclusive. Essentially Maguire (like probably every other player at the club), knows IF their valuation is met and they want to go, they can. The issue here is, some clubs are unwilling to meet that valuation. Take the Mahrez transfer saga. If we get the alleged £90 million bid (without the offer of the cast off of shite that these fools have spent the last few years accumulating) and you want to go, good luck. If you want the move, so be it. Now get your advisors and the suitors to meet the valuation - I don’t understand how they think this is a foregone conclusion. We are having to fork out a considerable sum for Tielemans when it was us who essentially doubled that valuation by getting the best out of him. We expect the same in return for our assets. The use of Khun Vichai’s name and the tone of the article (whether it’s true or not) is disgusting though. To attempt to place a club under pressure to sell and to use a highly emotional topic to bring about attention to the deal (so essentially it can be thrown back at Top in case we play hardball on the valuation) is below the belt. Both from the paper and whoever “leaked” the story - it’s not needed. 17 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post GingerrrFox Posted 16 June 2019 Popular Post Share Posted 16 June 2019 34 minutes ago, HankMarvin said: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/9303698/man-utd-ed-woodward-80m-harry-maguire-leicester-england-transfer/ 350k a week ? “The Red Devils could throw Eric Bailly and Marcos Rojo into the deal if Foxes boss Brendan Rodgers is prepared to accept a part-exchange.” just take the money I’d take £70 million and Bailly for Maguire. Bailly could still be world class in time 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HankMarvin Posted 16 June 2019 Share Posted 16 June 2019 8 minutes ago, GingerrrFox said: I’d take £70 million and Bailly for Maguire. Bailly could still be world class in time Played just 25 games in 2 seasons recovering from a serious knee injury and Man U seem him in training close up and want to replace him. yeah he looked good the first season there but has severely regressed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roblcfc84 Posted 16 June 2019 Share Posted 16 June 2019 The number of Maguire exclusives and articles is astounding. Don't get me wrong he's a good defender, who's steady on the ball and brings play out from the back really well (most of time). But he is not a 70-90 million pound player. Out of everyone linked with a move I genuinely believe he is the one player that can be replaced when compared to Ricardo, Chilwell, Maddison and even Youri. Im sure a move would be lucrative for him but I also think this is another case of a Leicester player being over hyped by the media when in reality, like Mahrez and DD, he's just not quite good enough for that top level. Some players shine at a club like ours. Kante is the only one who was genuinely in that top tier. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts