BenTheFox Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 1 hour ago, mazarron fox said: Why don’t we let the people in charge of the club decide what’s best for the club and we can all relax to be honest we have the best young team in the league and a manager that knows his stuff let’s just enjoy the ride or is that beyond most of us here? This is a forum for fans of a football club to debate on issues concerning said football club.
Tielemans63 Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/13/leicester-city-real-pressure-keep-manchester-united-target-harry-maguire-claims-gary-neville-9945215/amp/
Dan Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 3 hours ago, yorkie1999 said: Sky need a big signing every transfer window to justify their huge investment in the premier league and they don't care who the winners and losers are. No news is bad news for them Yeah in all seriousness I get why they're doing it but it's still cringeworthy nontheless. I think their stock has really fallen though.
splinterdream Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 I don't get this eagerness to take £60-£80m to supplement our transfer budget, doesn't the club get something like £200m a season with TV money, sponcership etc? Has the Mahrez money been spent? If we only signed Youri this window and lost nobody I think it'd be better than losing maguire for 3 unknown players, who knows what losing a major player for rivals does to the mental thinking of the other players in the team. Lots of comments from other fans saying HM would be better off staying at Leicester, this season is a real chance at top 6 I think, more of a chance than 16/17 but not if we sell our stars. To say Bencovic and Soyuncu are ready replacements, the first never played in the prem, the second a couple of times, of which he looked a bit bomb scare with his back passes, I'd rather we tell Utd and City to stick it and go for top 4 this season.
Ashley Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 53 minutes ago, splinterdream said: I don't get this eagerness to take £60-£80m to supplement our transfer budget, doesn't the club get something like £200m a season with TV money, sponcership etc? Has the Mahrez money been spent? If we only signed Youri this window and lost nobody I think it'd be better than losing maguire for 3 unknown players, who knows what losing a major player for rivals does to the mental thinking of the other players in the team. Lots of comments from other fans saying HM would be better off staying at Leicester, this season is a real chance at top 6 I think, more of a chance than 16/17 but not if we sell our stars. To say Bencovic and Soyuncu are ready replacements, the first never played in the prem, the second a couple of times, of which he looked a bit bomb scare with his back passes, I'd rather we tell Utd and City to stick it and go for top 4 this season. Mahrez money went on the new training ground which again gone up in price.
st albans fox Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 2 minutes ago, Ashley said: Mahrez money went on the new training ground which again gone up in price. The training ground is an infrastructure investment ......the mahrez monies have been secured against the loan but aren’t specifically required in order for it to be built.
dmayne7 Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 2 hours ago, deep blue said: Like the move to Man C has elevated Mahrez's game? Nope. Didn't mention Mahrez for a reason. He's not Harry Maguire. I don't think the expectation was for Mahrez to improve a lot because of the level he's at. Maguire has got a fair bit of scope for development but certain players need to make that step up to fulfil their potential.
Dan Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 Surely the Mahrez money largely went on signings last season too? Maddison £23mil, Ricardo £17mil, Soyuncu £20mil, Benkovic, Ward & Ghezzal about £12.5mil each.
Out Foxed Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 Morgan and Evans are both tail ending and there’s no guarantee on soy boy and benkovic, dunno why some people are so quick to get shot of Maguire.
Corky Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 6 hours ago, Dan LCFC said: Sky are gutted he plays for us. Huge huge gang of weirdos I don't normally get into all this but can see exactly where you are coming from. There is a real desperation to get him to move, yet our fans seem quite blase about the whole thing. And Maguire himself doesn't seem completely keen on leaving either. Sky want the status quo however, they've got the so-called Big Six and it needs to stay that way.
ARM1968 Posted 13 June 2019 Posted 13 June 2019 £70 million plus Martial and Rashford. Seems fair to me
yorkie1999 Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 5 hours ago, Dan LCFC said: Yeah in all seriousness I get why they're doing it but it's still cringeworthy nontheless. I think their stock has really fallen though. Hope so because, Along with bt and now amazon all wanting a share of the pie, and there only so many matches to share round, we might get sky pushing for Saturday 3 o’clock matches to be shown live. It’s the only thing left for them to persue
weller54 Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 3 hours ago, yorkie1999 said: Hope so because, Along with bt and now amazon all wanting a share of the pie, and there only so many matches to share round, we might get sky pushing for Saturday 3 o’clock matches to be shown live. It’s the only thing left for them to persue So basically what you're saying is that it's all pie in the sky?
Babylon Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 9 hours ago, splinterdream said: I don't get this eagerness to take £60-£80m to supplement our transfer budget, doesn't the club get something like £200m a season with TV money, sponcership etc? Has the Mahrez money been spent? If we only signed Youri this window and lost nobody I think it'd be better than losing maguire for 3 unknown players, who knows what losing a major player for rivals does to the mental thinking of the other players in the team. Lots of comments from other fans saying HM would be better off staying at Leicester, this season is a real chance at top 6 I think, more of a chance than 16/17 but not if we sell our stars. To say Bencovic and Soyuncu are ready replacements, the first never played in the prem, the second a couple of times, of which he looked a bit bomb scare with his back passes, I'd rather we tell Utd and City to stick it and go for top 4 this season. We bought over £100m of players last year, yes the Mahrez money has been spent. The “200m” is £158.9m turnover... which pays for everything. Wages, bonuses, loan repayments, cleaners, police, lighting, heating, ground, training ground, staff etc etc etc. Our usual transfer budget is unlikely to be able to even afford Tielemans. So people would be keen on selling Maguire if it secured funds for what we really need.... Tielemans, a striker and a winger. The discussions is really about keeping an open mind and keeping the option on the table as none of us know the actual budget or what players are available.
Dahnsouff Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 De ja vu @Babylon If the do/don’t sell Harry had its own thread, we would be approaching 50 pages by now I reckon!
Nick Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 Man City going cold on Maguire because they don’t want to spend £80 million. Im amazed they haven’t offered 55 and just expect him to show up like the lowballing bastards normally do! And Harry hates Utd so lovely, he’s staying then.
wokinghamfox Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 Irs all just paper talk, nothing concrete, its all once again bulls..t sources say. No offer has been lodged yet and we would probably turn it away anyway. So lets look forward to big Arry at tbe back once again next season. Top 6 next year he we come!
st albans fox Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 59 minutes ago, Swan Lesta said: Man City going cold on Maguire because they don’t want to spend £80 million. Im amazed they haven’t offered 55 and just expect him to show up like the lowballing bastards normally do! And Harry hates Utd so lovely, he’s staying then. Man City will be expecting him to change his attitude and push for the move - hence lowering the price ........ will he though ?? Word was that he wouldn’t ....... perhaps we are seeing drips of info which relate to different time points ......
Sly Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 Can we start a rumour that we’re in for Pogba for £55,000,000 and just keep if rolling for no reason?!? We’re also in for Sane at £40,000,000 and we’ll just keep leaking that until he asks for a move .....
Guest Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 17 minutes ago, Sly said: Can we start a rumour that we’re in for Pogba for £55,000,000 and just keep if rolling for no reason?!? Nooooo! They might sell him to us. Nobody is going to pay £90m for Maguire, seems we'll be holding back the Benko- Soyu partnership until at least January.
sylofox Posted 14 June 2019 Author Posted 14 June 2019 20 hours ago, Dahnsouff said: As well you know @Col city fan - I was not calling @sylofox a dumb ass, it was hyperbole... (or was it... ) Dahnsouff I know its Col trying stir shite. A bit underhand of my sparing partner trying to drop you in it. Col your comment was out of order fight your own battles you pussy
sylofox Posted 14 June 2019 Author Posted 14 June 2019 9 hours ago, Izzy said: You tw@ I just choked laughing at that. Only you could post that
Simoken Posted 14 June 2019 Posted 14 June 2019 I just love how our club can ask for these kinds of silly transfer costs!! the days of pathetic Kante transfers are well and truly over cant bully a rich club!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.