Popular Post Leicester_Loyal Posted 21 August 2020 Popular Post Share Posted 21 August 2020 50m is a wank fee, you won't convince me otherwise. Should be 60m minimum IMO. 6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Just now, Devonfox1884 said: I don’t know how much you’ve heard - but do you know if the £50m is all upfront ala the Maguire fee or spread out in instalments? Is the recent loan acquired related to this transfer I wonder, if so, no it probably is not all up front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PNM Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 1 minute ago, MPH said: Was a lot of paper talk that Maguire was close to a 50 million switch to Man United too... possibly chelsea trying to put pressure on us to do the deal like Man United did... I think there was something after saying it was definitely a direct £80m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mee-9 Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 TAGLIAFICO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryy Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 #WelcomeBertrand 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 1 minute ago, Leicester_Loyal said: 50m is a wank fee, you won't convince me otherwise. Should be 60m minimum IMO. How much was Mahrez worth? A price is rarely a simple metric I imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester_Loyal Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 5 minutes ago, GingerrrFox said: For what it’s worth I’ve heard the £50 million is the guaranteed and there’s more ££ dependent on Chelsea winning things over the course of his first contract with them. See this changes things, I'm ok with that. 50m and no add ons is a wank fee though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerbyshireFox Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 6 minutes ago, Jaspa said: Shouldn't matter we didn't get Champions League, it didn't stop us holding out for the cheddar for Maguire. Should be expecting £65m+ at least for Chilly There was no pandemic last summer though. Considering so many people don’t seem to ‘rate him’, fair few complaints about the fee. It’ll probably have add ons that we don’t know about. I’d rather he’d stayed, but if he wants to move on, £50m in this climate is pretty good going! Anyone paying north of £60m for a full back needs their head testing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious Leicester Fan Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 (edited) If Chilwell’s transfer fee has markedly dropped, then this has not happened in a vacuum. I imagine a similar percentage drop will be reflected in most other transfers. Edited 21 August 2020 by Glorious Leicester Fan 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicester_Loyal Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Just now, Dahnsouff said: How much was Mahrez worth? A price is rarely a simple metric I imagine. I thought he was worth more than 60m tbf, was unreal. We're looking at Dwight Mcneil for 40m ffs Although obviously prices have changed in the past 2 years. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Just now, DerbyshireFox said: There was no pandemic last summer though. Considering so many people don’t seem to ‘rate him’, fair few complaints about the fee. It’ll probably have add ons that we don’t know about. I’d rather he’d stayed, but if he wants to move on, £50m in this climate is pretty good going! Anyone paying north of £60m for a full back needs their head testing. “Calling Mr Guardiola, Mr Guardiola to the checkout.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 2 minutes ago, Devonfox1884 said: I don’t know how much you’ve heard - but do you know if the £50m is all upfront ala the Maguire fee or spread out in instalments? Don’t have a clue, knew it was close to being agreed earlier this week but it was dragging out because they couldn’t agree how much was upfront vs instalments. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goober Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 If we get Tagliafico in and make a profit overall it's decent business in the circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beechey Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Well, £50m I guess makes him the worlds third most expensive full back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnderbyFox Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Sean From Enderby in the mud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rachhere Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Somewhat disappointing fee, but the thing is the more we get for him, the more other teams will inflate their prices knowing we have the money. It will all balance out in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucashm Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Well, the reports linking you guys to Tagliafico make a ton of sense now. Lets be honest, 50 million is a **** ton of money, you guys got a great deal and it should go a long way to funding other signings, especially considering that Tags should probably cost around 20 million euros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox92 Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Would have liked 10m more but if we get a replacement plus some left over I'll be happy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Just now, EnderbyFox said: Sean From Enderby in the mud Like it was ever in doubt, no one knows as much as he claims unless they earn enough money not to talk about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 1 minute ago, EnderbyFox said: Sean From Enderby in the mud Mate. He always has and always will chat bum dust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Also, Chelsea fans are acting as if they're signing Ryan McGivern circa 2010 - I think Chilwell is fundamentally quite limited but he's more than steady enough and at his age there's scope to improve with the right coaching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devonfox1884 Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 7 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: Is the recent loan acquired related to this transfer I wonder, if so, no it probably is not all up front. I did think that. But ultimately I’m not well-versed enough in the world of football finance to speculate too much 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lineker's Left Foot Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Just now, Devonfox1884 said: I did think that. But ultimately I’m not well-versed enough in the world of football finance to speculate too much Will do well at Chelsea. Whilst we’re paying off the training ground and expansion this is I guess why we’re selling one key player per year. I guess it’s a fine line. We can’t seen to be seen as a team that ‘holds players back’ but also want to keep hold of key assets too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UniFox21 Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 4 minutes ago, Fox92 said: Would have liked 10m more but if we get a replacement plus some left over I'll be happy. Same, £50mill seems low and not too happy with that £60m+ and I'd be laughing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 21 August 2020 Share Posted 21 August 2020 Just now, Lineker's Left Foot said: Will do well at Chelsea. Whilst we’re paying off the training ground and expansion this is I guess why we’re selling one key player per year. I guess it’s a fine line. We can’t seen to be seen as a team that ‘holds players back’ but also want to keep hold of key assets too. Exactly this. Otherwise these players won’t sign to begin with. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts