Premier League 2020/21 Thread

[Guest MarshallForEngland]

Just now, peach0000 said:

If the ball went directly in from the initial header I could understand the offside decision. However I feel once the second player who was on side then finishes it then it should be allowed 

Exactly what I was thinking. 

[Guest MarshallForEngland]

Just now, TrentFox said:

You just know an injury time winner for Pool is coming 😖

 

Salah dive and instant pen?

[The People's Hero]

5 minutes ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

They'll be something made up within the next 10 minutes as to why it was chalked off due to the letters of the law.

I think we call know there are only 2 clubs in the league who would get the benefit of that decision and they both play in red.

[Unabomber]

1 minute ago, peach0000 said:

If the ball went directly in from the initial header I could understand the offside decision. However I feel once the second player who was on side then finishes it then it should be allowed 

100% not seen anything like it 

[FoxesWalk]

LiVARpool for a reason 

[Izzy]

1 minute ago, peach0000 said:

If the ball went directly in from the initial header I could understand the offside decision. However I feel once the second player who was on side then finishes it then it should be allowed 

Did the ref miss the fact it has finished by a different player do you think? It was only the slightest of touches so maybe he missed it?

[katieakita]

Now why was it Mike Dean was not allowed to ref Liverpool games?

[The Quick Brown Fox]

7 minutes ago, enmac said:

West Brom blocked goalie view. Even Carragher thinks it's a goal. 

He only says that because it wasn't given. 

[Unabomber]

1 minute ago, FoxesWalk said:

LiVARpool for a reason 

Apparently the guy who invented VAR is one of John Henry’s business partners! You just can’t write this. 

[foxes_rule1978]

3 minutes ago, peach0000 said:

If the ball went directly in from the initial header I could understand the offside decision. However I feel once the second player who was on side then finishes it then it should be allowed 

Jammy Liverpool hope that dont nick a win when they have been so sh*t

[Hoopla10]

Just now, Izzy said:

Did the ref miss the fact it has finished by a different player do you think? It was only the slightest of touches so maybe he missed it?

Isn't that what VAR is for?

[majaco]

And let's not forget the level of incompetence from Mike Dean of awarding a free kick that led to the Liverpool goal.  He gave a foul based on a guess.  A wrong guess.

[Unabomber]

Just now, browniefox said:

He only says that because it wasn't given. 

He said it before tbf

[The People's Hero]

Can't have this lot in the CL next year; running the English co-efficient.

 

 

[Izzy]

Just now, Hoopla10 said:

Isn't that what VAR is for?

Well I thought so.

 

I'm flummoxed by that decision.

 

I demand an answer.

 

[enmac]

1 minute ago, browniefox said:

He only says that because it wasn't given. 

Said that before the decision. 

[SuperMike]

1 minute ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

Jammy Liverpool hope that dont nick a win when they have been so sh*t

They will

[King of Gipsy Lane]

Nerve wracking this 

[FrankieADZ]

imagine if that was a Liverpool goal that got ruled out, theyd be a bloody petition, Klopp going crazy etc

at times VAR is a farce as it just isnt consistent at all

 

[Tuna]

This is like the last 5 minutes of the cup final!

[Dahnsouff]

Don’t trust  that Liverpool won’t get a reach around, so the Baggies need another

[Mark_w]

If it finishes 1-1 Liverpool have absolutely robbed a point, wouldn't be remotely surprised if they steal all three though.

[Wasyls Pec Deck]

Christ if WBA can hold out that would be huge for us.

[Guest Harrydc]

Some things go in your favour and some thing don't. 

 

Many Chelsea fans feel incredibly hard done by with our goal yesterday and their goal being disallowed. 

 

Both could have went either way, same as this one. 

[AKCJ]

Imagine letting a scouser referee Liverpool games. He's having a shocker.