peterborofox Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Absolutely ridiculous. They want Liverpool in top four Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend_in_blue Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 LiVARpool strike again. Corruption at the highest level of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAFC1 Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Disgrace that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osavo Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 How on earth can that not be a goal. That goes in regardless of where Phillips is stood. Joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheUltimateWinner Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Wow Liverpool have been given the game by the officials today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarshallForEngland Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 That is an absolute scandal. Genuinely unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxesWalk Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 One of the worst decisions of the season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chocolate Teapot Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 We can't moan about VAR but there's no way that's offside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuna Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 That's bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Just now, The People's Hero said: Refs lost his cards too. Are you referring to Fabinho not getting a booking for his tackle on Gallagher? That one confused me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwell Pablo Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 What a bag of shit decision that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frost Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Corruption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unabomber Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Wait what? He was onside? They’ve just shown it! It’s not even close, this is fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21st Century Fox Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Joke. Don't let your heads drop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
katieakita Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Just now, matty98 said: How the actual fvck has that been disallowed? Because it was LiVARpool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheeseHead Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Wtf! Shocking decision Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluefoxtim Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 What a crock of shite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filbertway Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Cant wait to hear the explanation for that one. Disgraceful. Theres no way Phillip's was affecting play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cadno'r Cymoedd Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 1 minute ago, Vacamion said: After yesterday, I ain't criticising VAR. But the officials have failed there. Yesterday was right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Hero Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Just now, Chocolate Teapot said: We can't moan about VAR but there's no way that's offside Fickle football fans' right mate! They are so desperate to have Liverpool in the CL. 2 absolutely bizarre officiating incidents in this game. WBA should be 2 nil up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izzy Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Someone needs to explain that decision to me please. I'm confused why that wasn't allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox_in_a_Box Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 I've not seen it but thats a ****ing joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unabomber Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 They just showed video evidence that he was onside and still ruled it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dan LCFC Posted 16 May 2021 Popular Post Share Posted 16 May 2021 That is absolutely scandalous. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Harrydc Posted 16 May 2021 Share Posted 16 May 2021 Just now, Izzy said: Someone needs to explain that decision to me please. I'm confused why that wasn't allowed. I believe he was obstructing the keepers view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts