Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Absolutely ridiculous. They want Liverpool in top four
Legend_in_blue Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 LiVARpool strike again. Corruption at the highest level of the game.
Osavo Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 How on earth can that not be a goal. That goes in regardless of where Phillips is stood. Joke.
TheUltimateWinner Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Wow Liverpool have been given the game by the officials today
Guest MarshallForEngland Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 That is an absolute scandal. Genuinely unbelievable.
Guest Chocolate Teapot Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 We can't moan about VAR but there's no way that's offside
filbertway Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Just now, The People's Hero said: Refs lost his cards too. Are you referring to Fabinho not getting a booking for his tackle on Gallagher? That one confused me
Unabomber Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Wait what? He was onside? They’ve just shown it! It’s not even close, this is fixed.
katieakita Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Just now, matty98 said: How the actual fvck has that been disallowed? Because it was LiVARpool
filbertway Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Cant wait to hear the explanation for that one. Disgraceful. Theres no way Phillip's was affecting play
Cadno'r Cymoedd Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 1 minute ago, Vacamion said: After yesterday, I ain't criticising VAR. But the officials have failed there. Yesterday was right
The People's Hero Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Just now, Chocolate Teapot said: We can't moan about VAR but there's no way that's offside Fickle football fans' right mate! They are so desperate to have Liverpool in the CL. 2 absolutely bizarre officiating incidents in this game. WBA should be 2 nil up!
Izzy Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Someone needs to explain that decision to me please. I'm confused why that wasn't allowed.
Unabomber Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 They just showed video evidence that he was onside and still ruled it out.
Guest Harrydc Posted 16 May 2021 Posted 16 May 2021 Just now, Izzy said: Someone needs to explain that decision to me please. I'm confused why that wasn't allowed. I believe he was obstructing the keepers view.
Recommended Posts