Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, peach0000 said:

Yes. They aren't allowed to approach the referee on the field of play. (why bilic went as well)

Gotcha, just seems partially bizarre players get away with hurling abuse but staff don't. 

Posted
Just now, UniFox21 said:

Gotcha, just seems partially bizarre players get away with hurling abuse but staff don't. 

If he'd done it in the tunnel or touch line he wouldn't have gone. It was purely because he was on the pitch. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
Just now, Vacamion said:

 

Jose straight batting this.

 

 

No point doing anything else, he knows he'd be fined 

 

edit: he's made a good point, do fines from the FA go to the FA or to charity? If not the latter it's poor. 

Edited by UniFox21
Guest seanfox778
Posted

Fair play to Jose for not biting. He must be raging inside. 

Posted
1 minute ago, David Hankey said:

Looking at it negatively, if the ref and VAR get all the handball decisions wrong then it will even itself out.

VAR itself is fine, just how the law is being applied isn’t working 

Posted
1 minute ago, splinterdream said:

what is the rule now? any handball that stops an attack in the area, intentional or not is a penalty?

 

If the arm is away from the body, yes. 

Guest Kopfkino
Posted

The 10k fine would be worth it to speak your mind and call out this shit, in fact he wouldnt be slagging off the ref by talking about the rule so would he get fined? It's probably only 10% of his take home pay for the week anyway.

Posted
2 minutes ago, splinterdream said:

what is the rule now? any handball that stops an attack in the area, intentional or not is a penalty?

 

I think it's has to hit elbow or lower too. 

Posted
1 minute ago, splinterdream said:

what is the rule now? any handball that stops an attack in the area, intentional or not is a penalty?

 

I think if it's point blank and the arm is right by your side it's not an offence allegedly. Dier's arm being extended is what ****ed him over.

Posted
11 minutes ago, peach0000 said:

To be fair Diers hands were miles away from his body and did bloke the ball from going into a threatening area. If that had been done by an opposing against Leicester we'd all be wanting it.

I really wouldn’t.

 

Fouls are meant to be given for offences which give a team an unfair advantage. Dier jumping in the hair and having a ball headed at his arm isn’t gaining an unfair advantage.

Posted (edited)

I’d rather put up with a rule that can be changed than watching sly devious cheating b@stards diving to get a pen and cheat the other team ...    

 

or feign injury to get someone sent off ... 

 

 

Edited by Countryfox
Posted
17 minutes ago, DennisNedry said:

This is tragic - can see coaches telling attacking players to just try and chip the ball at a defenders arm every time they're in and around the box. 

 

 

Exactly this and why wouldn't you given the shite thats been awarded so far. 

 

Gone are the days of holding the ball up out wide or trying to win a corner with nothing on, just smack it against a defender and take your chances. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, EastAnglianFox said:

 

Exactly this and why wouldn't you given the shite thats been awarded so far. 

 

Gone are the days of holding the ball up out wide or trying to win a corner with nothing on, just smack it against a defender and take your chances. 

remember the nfl was ruined by them interfering with the game

 

now its happening here.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...