fuchsntf Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 You all want to Live in a Democratic Capitalist society, your aspirations are of ones own life's progress & developent...or Take life easy & cruise through your days... I dont know then why some people are concerned on what other people earn... If you find it disgusting....lets all go on the Revolution wagon, and Charge into the Feel free Freedom of Anarchy.!!!!!!
Innovindil Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 1 minute ago, fuchsntf said: I dont know then why some people are concerned on what other people earn Because they are paid out of a pretty much guarenteed national fund. No one would bat an eye if he was raking in millions off sky. The bbc shouldn't be used in such a way, it sits without peer and doesn't have to compete with other services. Imo, it should be used to give opportunities to up and coming talents and provide a steady stream of people into other services. How many young actors/news readers etc etc would love an opportunity for a shot at a bbc show.
StanSP Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 3 minutes ago, Innovindil said: Because they are paid out of a pretty much guarenteed national fund. No one would bat an eye if he was raking in millions off sky. The bbc shouldn't be used in such a way, it sits without peer and doesn't have to compete with other services. Imo, it should be used to give opportunities to up and coming talents and provide a steady stream of people into other services. How many young actors/news readers etc etc would love an opportunity for a shot at a bbc show. Do you think BBC is just BBC1 and BBC2? When you say doesn't compete with other services, you do know there are other channels, streaming services, music platforms etc as well, right?
Innovindil Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 1 minute ago, StanSP said: Do you think BBC is just BBC1 and BBC2? When you say doesn't compete with other services, you do know there are other channels, streaming services, music platforms etc as well, right? Yes, all of which have to earn their funds. Either through attracting advertisers or a subscription service. When I say BBC sit without peer, I mean they have a guarenteed income.
Guest Kopfkino Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 1 hour ago, Lionator said: Why don’t you house a refugee they said? Then when he does, it’s why don’t you house a homeless veteran instead. Then when he takes a pay cut, it’s not enough for others. Of course he has a bit of an ego, wouldn’t you if you were in his shoes. But you have to hand it to the bloke. He could find a covid vaccine, cure malaria, reverse climate change and win England the World Cup and people will still hate him for being a bit of an outspoken ‘leftie liberal’. Jesus wept, has Gary Lineker become the wet leftie messiah now? Literally the same shit chat Trump fans use
fuchsntf Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 23 minutes ago, Innovindil said: Because they are paid out of a pretty much guarenteed national fund. No one would bat an eye if he was raking in millions off sky. The bbc shouldn't be used in such a way, it sits without peer and doesn't have to compete with other services. Imo, it should be used to give opportunities to up and coming talents and provide a steady stream of people into other services. How many young actors/news readers etc etc would love an opportunity for a shot at a bbc show. Why..Top People & organisations,have always pulled the Financial strings ,public or private.The linekers the panels,documentries,Actors..etc are just well paid spend in their game of power...
jonthefox Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 50 minutes ago, Heathrow fox said: Whats Greg James on then I wonder? Drugs judging by the waffle he comes out with. I'm not a fan of BBC radio btw.
Innovindil Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 4 minutes ago, fuchsntf said: Why..Top People & organisations,have always pulled the Financial strings ,public or private.The linekers the panels,documentries,Actors..etc are just well paid spend in their game of power... Because the BBC doesn't need top people. Who gives a monkey who hosts MOTD, I'd still tune in if it was a random on £40k/year. I'm there for the highlights, not Gary.
Fox92 Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 4 minutes ago, Innovindil said: Because the BBC doesn't need top people. Who gives a monkey who hosts MOTD, I'd still tune in if it was a random on £40k/year. I'm there for the highlights, not Gary. You wouldn't though would you? People moan about presenters and pundits all the time. You're telling me you'd enjoy watching the likes of Crooks and Jenas every single week? Of course, mainly, it's about the highlights but a good team make the programme (like any programme). Otherwise news anchors and presenters would just be picked off from the streets.
Soar Fox Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 I’m surprised MOTD still gets so many viewers. You can see highlights and goals pretty much instantly nowadays whether that’s on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube or the sky sports app. I preferred MOTD in the 90’s as a child, I would only need to ignore the news & teletext and I’d be able to watch MOTD not knowing any of the scores.
AKCJ Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 How any Leicester fan can question Gary Lineker is beyond me. We'd have gone the same way as the likes of Portsmouth without him.
fuchsntf Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 7 minutes ago, Innovindil said: Because the BBC doesn't need top people. Who gives a monkey who hosts MOTD, I'd still tune in if it was a random on £40k/year. I'm there for the highlights, not Gary. But neither you or I ,are Part of the presentation & Marketing process, even as shrewd viewers/customers....
Innovindil Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 5 minutes ago, Fox92 said: You wouldn't though would you? Yes. I really would.
goody2028 Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 Love when people slate Lineker for his wages as if you’d turn it down if offered to you
Wymsey Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 Like when he was when he was one of the heads of the consortium that helped as he LCFC all of those years ago, him and financial greed aren't a good match.. Imagine if he refused a salary deduction, the salary was kept as it was before and he continued to be on-air at the BBC? - There'd be critics left, right and centre; let alone some of the reaction from some on this forum. To be fair, he needs an ego to host and follow-through such a highly-popular football show well in order to keep the audience entertained - look at Jeff Stelling on Gillette Soccer Special; he can both be humorous and other things to keep the 'banter' etc flowing during the programme.
jammie82uk Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 1 hour ago, Heathrow fox said: Whats Greg James on then I wonder? He’s in the £275,000 to £279,999 bracket
Heathrow fox Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 1 minute ago, jammie82uk said: He’s in the £275,000 to £279,999 bracket That’s a pretty modest wage for radios top gig.
Stevosevic Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 Will always be people bitter about another person's success.
peach0000 Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 All I see in this thread is jealousy. It's everywhere.
String fellow Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 Whilst Sue Barker, Matt Dawson and Phil Tufnell have all been blown out from A Question of Sport, Old Big Ears is not only still minting it on Match of the Day, but he's also there for another 5 years. Not bad, considering he doesn't even present the Sunday edition of the show. Personally, I'd prefer to see someone like Gabby Logan presenting it, some different pundits, less of the pointless chat/analysis, a different theme tune and a change of name for the programme itself. The name Match of the Day implies one match - the best - not every PL match played that day.
Mark_w Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 1 hour ago, fuchsntf said: You all want to Live in a Democratic Capitalist society That's a big assumption. I'd quite like to live in a Democratic Socialist society.
Nick Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 6 minutes ago, Mark_w said: That's a big assumption. I'd quite like to live in a Democratic Socialist society. I’d like to live with Gary.
jammie82uk Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 51 minutes ago, Heathrow fox said: That’s a pretty modest wage for radios top gig. he’s one of the lowest paid radio hosts
Nuneatonfox in Manchester Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 Christ, this Lineker love in is nauseating.
The whole world smiles Posted 15 September 2020 Posted 15 September 2020 12 minutes ago, Nuneatonfox in Manchester said: Christ, this Lineker love in is nauseating. He was born in Leicester, he won promotion with Leicester, he won the top divison golden Boot with Leicester, He's the clubs 7th highest scorer of all time. He's Englands 3rd highest scorer of all time. He a huge fan and bigs the club up at every opportunity on TV. Perhaps you shouldn't be too surprised of sickened by love for him on a Leicester City supporters board.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.