Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Some of the misinformation around player availability is ridiculous. Sky News just praised Wolves for winning at Man U with a "massively depleted" squad. Just checked their team that day and it was as follows:

 

Sa - first choice

 

Kilman - first choice

Coady - first choice

Saiss- first choice

 

Semedo - first choice

Neves - first choice

Moutinho - first choice

Marcal 

 

Trincao - first choice

Jiminez - first choice

Podence 

 

So basically 9 first choice players started. God I wish we'd been that depleted over the past 2 years. lol

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted


Whatever has been said by Durham on the past week (The darts issue aside, I’ve agreed with much of what he’s said in the past week tbh) but I don’t know how anyone can disagree with what he’s said here.

Posted
48 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Arsenal spurs will now be off 

 

tbf, Arsenal have a lot of injuries but if it’s xhaka’s suspension that takes them under the limit then they should have to play it 

There was an Arsenal side named that could possibly play and it was pretty strong. Only real issue was White playing in midfield.

Posted

What a complete joke

 

Should have been a rule from the beginning that if you can’t field a team you forfeit the game. 
 

Teams will keep doing this at least until the AFCON is over. 

  • Like 3
Posted

Because if it was an automatic forfeit for not playing the game, there wouldn’t have been a single postponement and teams would have found a way, played a few kids, recalled loan players, signed a free agent, etc. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

What’s the point of stockpiling players like the big teams do if a sending off and a few covid cases mean your whole fixture list is in the bin. 

Edited by Asha
  • Like 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Matt said:


Whatever has been said by Durham on the past week (The darts issue aside, I’ve agreed with much of what he’s said in the past week tbh) but I don’t know how anyone can disagree with what he’s said here.

There is one thing you can disagree with him on here. It reads as if he’s patting himself on the back and is vilified for being a petulant child, spewing nonsense without context. 
 

Just because he’s saying one thing that is marginally acceptable doesn’t mean I’ll let him off for the shit that’s gone before. 

  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Sunbury Fox said:

Some of the misinformation around player availability is ridiculous. Sky News just praised Wolves for winning at Man U with a "massively depleted" squad. Just checked their team that day and it was as follows:

 

Sa - first choice

 

Kilman - first choice

Coady - first choice

Saiss- first choice

 

Semedo - first choice

Neves - first choice

Moutinho - first choice

Marcal 

 

Trincao - first choice

Jiminez - first choice

Podence 

 

So basically 9 first choice players started. God I wish we'd been that depleted over the past 2 years. lol

Correct. Only Marcal came in for Ait-Nouri (who tested positive). We had a few injuries in the squad but the first XI was still strong. 

Posted

I know everyone’s annoyed at postponements but the amount of games in hand we now have and still firmly midtable is incredible lol 

Posted

Trying to doze off, but the commentator keeps saying it’s Albrighton (All Brighton), and I wake with a start, it’s most annoying. lol

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Trying to doze off, but the commentator keeps saying it’s Albrighton (All Brighton), and I wake with a start, it’s most annoying. lol

 

I was thinking the exact same thing.

 

Quite off putting, given that "ALBRIGHTON! " is a perfectly acceptable thing to shout at the moment of climax.

 

 

Posted

Not sure the pen was a clear and obvious error - both players were tangling with each other to begin with 

 

and the goal was a straightforward foul - the keeper hasn’t dropped the ball - and the ref should be giving it, not the VAR 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, st albans fox said:

Not sure the pen was a clear and obvious error - both players were tangling with each other to begin with 

 

and the goal was a straightforward foul - the keeper hasn’t dropped the ball - and the ref should be giving it, not the VAR 

Thing is they’ve got history with this nonsense now so you just never know. Vestergaard vs Liverpool and Kasper’s hand-on-ball-on-ground foul earlier this season

Posted
35 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

and the goal was a straightforward foul - the keeper hasn’t dropped the ball - and the ref should be giving it, not the VAR 

Definitely didn’t need a var debate and going over to the screen.

Posted (edited)

Tbf think VAR got both decisions right.

 

Was clumsy by Hughes and the Palace goalie was fouled - albeit they usually get protected well .

 

Poor penalty .

Edited by Super_horns
  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...