Official 2021/2022 Kit Revealed

[Beliall]

i may actually get this one


Edit : or not  

 

Edited 23 May 2021 by Beliall

[FoxesWalk]

Looking at the images of Maddison and Hamza, the logos are different sizes/positions, pretty sure the FBS logo is edited on post photo. It’s smaller and higher up on Madders’ shirt and it looks better in that image.

Edited 23 May 2021 by FoxesWalk

[Guest Manini]

I take it it’s about £70? Can’t get on the site to look. 

Edited 23 May 2021 by Manini

[PaulW]

FBS as a company don't score very highly on Trust Pilot.

 

[FoxesWalk]

6 hours!!? 

[sishades]

3 minutes ago, Jimbo said:

So when you say modern, you actually mean anything from the '70's onwards? 

Oi! Respect your elders. The seventies were very fashionable. Side burns, platform shoes, big hair and flares were great. As a ten year old my brown and beige panelled suit with flared bottoms and large collars was stunning.

[Kitchandro]

Best kit we've had in at least 10 years. Almost no gold on it (so it actually looks like a Leicester kit), white shorts (much more traditional than the all blue) and unusually for adidas it's actually pretty unique and attractive.

 

 

[Finnaldo]

2 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

Best kit we've had in at least 10 years. Almost no gold on it (so it actually looks like a Leicester kit), white shorts (much more traditional than the all blue) and unusually for adidas it's actually pretty unique and attractive.

 

 

Best home kit probably since the 2004/05 one I think.

[sishades]

The look on Jamies face is one of "Do I have too wear this shite?" What's the bet that he threw it in the bin once the photo was taken. I have gone through this entire  thread just to see if I was being overly harsh on it. Well the boys in the lab have returned their findings and have confirmed that it is utterly shit. I cannot be bothered putting an "e" on the end as it really is shit.

[Wasyls Pec Deck]

I don’t like it, at all 

[JamesfromlondonLCFC]

19 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

Best kit we've had in at least 10 years. Almost no gold on it (so it actually looks like a Leicester kit), white shorts (much more traditional than the all blue) and unusually for adidas it's actually pretty unique and attractive.

 

 

It's possible we've been bumped up into Adidas next tier. Meaning we get actual original shirts made for us 

[sishades]

22 minutes ago, sishades said:

Oi! Respect your elders. The seventies were very fashionable. Side burns, platform shoes, big hair and flares were great. As a ten year old my brown and beige panelled suit with flared bottoms and large collars was stunning.

Oh I forgot the oversized kipper tie as well. 

 

[BigGibbo]

One of the more boring logos I can remember but the full kit is pretty tidy. Definitely prefer the traditional blue shirt with white shorts.

[Jace]

8 minutes ago, JamesfromlondonLCFC said:

It's possible we've been bumped up into Adidas next tier. Meaning we get actual original shirts made for us 

It'll mean the opposite if anything, player shirts will be better specification than the 1s sold to fans. Our shirts for a long time under Adidas and Puma Genesis have been sold the same as the player spec shirts 

[Brizzle Fox]

So that's the Birmingham City kit revealed. When they going to do ours? 

 

Seriously I've seen it said that this sponsorship is worth £100m over 3 years, which is nice, even if they are a tad dodgy... 

[Strokes]

It looks alright, a nice throwback to 1990-92.

Not keen on the look of the sponsor but we’ve been king power for so long, anything would look unusual.

If the sponsorship figures rumoured are even remotely accurate, it’s well worth it.

[Chicago Foxile]

It’s okay. I’m reading white shorts- we going white socks too? Hope so

Edited 23 May 2021 by Chicago Foxile

[Jattdogg]

That's a design i look at and can't quite decide if:

 

1) it is sexy

 

2) it is absolute shit

 

I had a late night and my brain is tired. Need to sleep on this one. 

 

[80footgiraffe]

Ive always liked the gold trims to stand us out, not having it as much does look a bit Birmingham/Cardiff but hey, we’re not playing them every week to compare. Sponsor is inoffensive if a little dull, but if it means we have a bit more cash during the worst financial year in a little while I’m all for it.

[LestaAl]

Most people hate any change to start with...we’ll love it if we keep performing  next season

[DerbyshireFox]

1 hour ago, Manini said:

I take it it’s about £70? Can’t get on the site to look. 

£60

[Izzy]

Really interesting how varied people’s opinions are on this new kit.

 

Personally, I think it’s rancid. 

[jammie82uk]

15 minutes ago, Chicago Foxile said:

It’s okay. I’m reading white shorts- we going white socks too? Hope so

Blue socks 

[CloudFox]

Not really a fan of that pattern, feels more like a training shirt. Might grow on me though!

 

[goose2010]

Glad they went for the white version of the logo rather than their Green one! 

 

I don't mind it and the home shirt is usually the worst out of our 3 so looking forward to the away shirts