FoxesWalk Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 BBC Gossip column quotes the times saying we are in for him (behind pay wall)
FoxesWalk Posted 21 January 2022 Author Posted 21 January 2022 Obligatory video. He can play RW, but he is a right footed left winger predominately so seems a bit odd to me if we are gonna keep Lookman. 2
Fox92 Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 (edited) He will be decent Premier League player, similar to Bowen. I think Lewis-Potter can play anywhere across though. In fact my mate who supports Hull says Lewis-Potter's finishing is better than Bowen's but I don't know if that's because Bowen has gone now I'd be looking at him but no doubt Moyes will have is eyes as he seems to pick up Championship players a lot. Edited 21 January 2022 by Fox92
ScrumpyJack Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 Would be Roy Keane for him, only because his name sounds like 60% of a five-a-side team
Finnegan Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 16 minutes ago, FoxesWalk said: Obligatory video. He can play RW, but he is a right footed left winger predominately so seems a bit odd to me if we are gonna keep Lookman. If I took my contacts out I could be watching Harvey Barnes. Very direct. 2
lcfc sheff Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 Him and Ramsay are the sort of talent we should be aiming for with regards to a £8-10m price range. 1
Stadt Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 They'll be holding out for over double that, he's brilliant. Played at wingback, as a winger and up front this season. If we could sign him now but loan him back for 18 months for a reduced fee we should absolutely do it.
Ric Flair Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 He's quality. I was hoping we'd take advantage of Hull's financial problems but haven't they now been bought out so he'll cost a touch more. Where he fits in if we sign Lookman as well, I'm not sure as we need a left footed right winger.
dmayne7 Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 1 hour ago, Finnegan said: If I took my contacts out I could be watching Harvey Barnes. Very direct. There was one touch early in the video that looked exactly like Harvey. Looks like he could do with an extra half a yard of pace from that video but that's likely to come in the next couple of years. 2
SheppyFox Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 Why do they always have terrible music on these scouting highlight videos?
turtmcfly Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 3 hours ago, FoxesWalk said: Obligatory video. He can play RW, but he is a right footed left winger predominately so seems a bit odd to me if we are gonna keep Lookman. 00:38 and 00:41 - looks like he'd also fit right into our defence
Buzzell Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 Looks a very promising player. Plays a lot like Barnes.
-sodapop Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 Looks a good player and I'd take him assuming it didn't take funds from anywhere else, but I'm not sure another left winger is what we need in the squad
kingfox Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 If we don’t sign Lookman permanently, then Lewis-Potter would be an excellent second choice. He is absolute quality, all you need to do is look at his highlights against Preston in the first game of the season, he tore them to shreds. 3
enmac Posted 21 January 2022 Posted 21 January 2022 3 hours ago, SheppyFox said: Why do they always have terrible music on these scouting highlight videos? Copyright problems if they play anything decent. 1
ARM1968 Posted 22 January 2022 Posted 22 January 2022 Lookman isn’t consistent enough to sign in my opinion. Good in some games, absent in others. 3
CrispinLA in Texas Posted 22 January 2022 Posted 22 January 2022 22 minutes ago, ARM1968 said: Lookman isn’t consistent enough to sign in my opinion. Good in some games, absent in others. He's better coming on as an impact sub coming on in the second half. When he starts the game he's always been poor
OhYesNdidi Posted 22 January 2022 Posted 22 January 2022 13 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said: He's better coming on as an impact sub coming on in the second half. When he starts the game he's always been poor Was brilliant against tottenahm I thought 2 1
MPH Posted 22 January 2022 Posted 22 January 2022 2 hours ago, ARM1968 said: Lookman isn’t consistent enough to sign in my opinion. Good in some games, absent in others. Even Tielemans doesn’t produce it every game.
ARM1968 Posted 22 January 2022 Posted 22 January 2022 1 hour ago, MPH said: Even Tielemans doesn’t produce it every game. Ahh. Ok. We equating Lookman with Tieleman’s then? Sheesh. Lookman is ok, ok, but we can do better. Can we do better than Tieleman’s? I doubt it.
MPH Posted 22 January 2022 Posted 22 January 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, ARM1968 said: Ahh. Ok. We equating Lookman with Tieleman’s then? Sheesh. Lookman is ok, ok, but we can do better. Can we do better than Tieleman’s? I doubt it. You missed the point completely. there’s not a single player out there who is going to play a belter every game. And if we can do better than Lookman, why haven’t we? I mean, the window is here, he’s a loan player. So why haven’t we sent him back and got this better player in you are talking about? Edited 22 January 2022 by MPH 2
sacreblueits442 Posted 23 January 2022 Posted 23 January 2022 1 hour ago, MPH said: You missed the point completely. there’s not a single player out there who is going to play a belter every game. And if we can do better than Lookman, why haven’t we? I mean, the window is here, he’s a loan player. So why haven’t we sent him back and got this better player in you are talking about? ....there is a possibility that the loan is for a season and therefore no room to change the agreement!!!
Recommended Posts